tbh he's right, your reports probably would not be as accurate, as you have not been around long enough to know who flames seriously and who dosen'tFatherTed wrote:
Seriously pace you have no idea what youre talking about,in a thread devoted to fixing a section you havnt polluted yet with your innane bullshit yet. please shut up. samtheman would be a better person to comment on this issue.
I tried to tell the kid that a page ago. Since then, he made 4 of the ten lasts posts. He doesn't get it.Trotskygrad wrote:
tbh he's right, your reports probably would not be as accurate, as you have not been around long enough to know who flames seriously and who dosen'tFatherTed wrote:
Seriously pace you have no idea what youre talking about,in a thread devoted to fixing a section you havnt polluted yet with your innane bullshit yet. please shut up. samtheman would be a better person to comment on this issue.
it was one day, 2 hours ago DB [ see your karma]DBBrinson1 wrote:
I tried to tell the kid that a page ago. Since then, he made 4 of the ten lasts posts. He doesn't get it.Trotskygrad wrote:
tbh he's right, your reports probably would not be as accurate, as you have not been around long enough to know who flames seriously and who dosen'tFatherTed wrote:
Seriously pace you have no idea what youre talking about,in a thread devoted to fixing a section you havnt polluted yet with your innane bullshit yet. please shut up. samtheman would be a better person to comment on this issue.
Oh please, you do not need to be a part of this forum for more than an hour to read and see who is who and what is what. there is no special right of passage in this forum to post an opinion on anything.DBBrinson1 wrote:
I tried to tell the kid that a page ago. Since then, he made 4 of the ten lasts posts. He doesn't get it.Trotskygrad wrote:
tbh he's right, your reports probably would not be as accurate, as you have not been around long enough to know who flames seriously and who dosen'tFatherTed wrote:
Seriously pace you have no idea what youre talking about,in a thread devoted to fixing a section you havnt polluted yet with your innane bullshit yet. please shut up. samtheman would be a better person to comment on this issue.
so, one hour membership and someone can come in and recommend wholesale changes, and be able to discern who's trolling, who's flaming and what needs to be done to fix everything?lowing wrote:
Oh please, you do not need to be a part of this forum for more than an hour to read and see who is who and what is what. there is no special right of passage in this forum to post an opinion on anything.DBBrinson1 wrote:
I tried to tell the kid that a page ago. Since then, he made 4 of the ten lasts posts. He doesn't get it.Trotskygrad wrote:
tbh he's right, your reports probably would not be as accurate, as you have not been around long enough to know who flames seriously and who dosen't
one hour and someone can come on here an post whatever the hell they want. if you do not like it, don't read it, ignore it, or respond to it. Either way, telling him he has no voice because he does not have any street cred in this forum in your eyes is ridiculous.burnzz wrote:
so, one hour membership and someone can come in and recommend wholesale changes, and be able to discern who's trolling, who's flaming and what needs to be done to fix everything?lowing wrote:
Oh please, you do not need to be a part of this forum for more than an hour to read and see who is who and what is what. there is no special right of passage in this forum to post an opinion on anything.DBBrinson1 wrote:
I tried to tell the kid that a page ago. Since then, he made 4 of the ten lasts posts. He doesn't get it.
JahManRed and Spark have posted about
a) respect, and
b) enforce rules already in place.
personally, i don't see one without the other, or a better course to encourage honest, open debate/serious talk. no new rules change will provide it.
Thats democracy.burnzz wrote:
so, one hour membership and someone can come in and recommend wholesale changes, and be able to discern who's trolling, who's flaming and what needs to be done to fix everything?
It's Flaming_Maniac's alter-ego.AussieReaper wrote:
Honestly, pace has been here a lot longer than you guys give him credit for...
burnzz wrote:
so, one hour membership and someone can come in and recommend wholesale changes, and be able to discern who's trolling, who's flaming and what needs to be done to fix everything?
JahManRed and Spark have posted about
a) respect, and
b) enforce rules already in place.
personally, i don't see one without the other, or a better course to encourage honest, open debate/serious talk. no new rules change will provide it.
the second part of what i wrote is relevant to the OP - i don't think an admin, mod, member, or guest could improve on a couple of suggestions already given.lowing wrote:
one hour and someone can come on here an post whatever the hell they want. if you do not like it, don't read it, ignore it, or respond to it. Either way, telling him he has no voice because he does not have any street cred in this forum in your eyes is ridiculous.
I don't care what someone offers as a suggestion, if it is a good idea it is a good idea, regardless of time in this forum. Plenty of forum vets with some shitty ideas, are you willing to accept them because of their longevity here? I doubt it.
then do not dismiss him because he hasn't been here asl ong as you think he should have.burnzz wrote:
burnzz wrote:
so, one hour membership and someone can come in and recommend wholesale changes, and be able to discern who's trolling, who's flaming and what needs to be done to fix everything?
JahManRed and Spark have posted about
a) respect, and
b) enforce rules already in place.
personally, i don't see one without the other, or a better course to encourage honest, open debate/serious talk. no new rules change will provide it.the second part of what i wrote is relevant to the OP - i don't think an admin, mod, member, or guest could improve on a couple of suggestions already given.lowing wrote:
one hour and someone can come on here an post whatever the hell they want. if you do not like it, don't read it, ignore it, or respond to it. Either way, telling him he has no voice because he does not have any street cred in this forum in your eyes is ridiculous.
I don't care what someone offers as a suggestion, if it is a good idea it is a good idea, regardless of time in this forum. Plenty of forum vets with some shitty ideas, are you willing to accept them because of their longevity here? I doubt it.
my point sir is that there are no shortcuts, no magical cures, no amount of time spent here that would improve Debate and Serious Talk without
a) respect, and
b) enforce rules already in place.
your mythical one hour wonder poster is entitled to ideas, all day long - without those points this forums going nowhere. except where it is right now . . .
i dismiss him for his incessant call to change these forums, without the inclusion for what was once here before him - and lowing, knowing that you have been following this thread, i would remind you that i am not one denouncing his lack of days registered, i denounce his desire to create and modify rules and post where and as he will with no regard to the terms of membership we each agreed to when we registered for this site.lowing wrote:
then do not dismiss him because he hasn't been here asl ong as you think he should have.
Thank you for finally giving me feedback I can work with burnzz. And maybe I should debate more... Alright. I will. Be prepared for walls of well-intentioned back-and-forth boredom (Debates).burnzz wrote:
i dismiss him for his incessant call to change these forums, without the inclusion for what was once here before him - and lowing, knowing that you have been following this thread, i would remind you that i am not one denouncing his lack of days registered, i denounce his desire to create and modify rules and post where and as he will with no regard to the terms of membership we each agreed to when we registered for this site.lowing wrote:
then do not dismiss him because he hasn't been here asl ong as you think he should have.
you want to be able post "Real World Facts about everything" everywhere - in each sub-forum, in everyone's face.pace51 wrote:
If so, feature requests would be made obsolete. This would let us request fetures without members derailing the threads.
what about for those of us who would like to discuss a topic without wandering thru piles of lowing vs euro goons shit?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
But at the same time, you can't punish those who do, and because11 Bravo wrote:
some of us would like to talk about things without massive quote trees.
cant blame me, I am not the one doing the piling on.11 Bravo wrote:
what about for those of us who would like to discuss a topic without wandering thru piles of lowing vs euro goons shit?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
But at the same time, you can't punish those who do, and because11 Bravo wrote:
some of us would like to talk about things without massive quote trees.
i know that. most people with some sort of brain can see that. just saying.lowing wrote:
cant blame me, I am not the one doing the piling on.11 Bravo wrote:
what about for those of us who would like to discuss a topic without wandering thru piles of lowing vs euro goons shit?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
But at the same time, you can't punish those who do, and because
and what fun would that be?FatherTed wrote:
I rather like talking with you lowing, i just wish you were slightly more flexible :p
Aactually, I do not wish to make the site in "my own image". I just want to help out and contribute. I don't want to put RWF everywhere. I accept how the site is, I just don't want it to fade into oblivion. I doubt it will, but a revive would be great.burnzz wrote:
i don't give a fuck if you debate more. you think more of this
http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/6219 … umentu.jpg
is going to fix things?
i care about the forum, some of the people that have left, some that are here, and the world-wide friendships i've made. you want to be able to hit the report button toyou want to be able post "Real World Facts about everything" everywhere - in each sub-forum, in everyone's face.pace51 wrote:
If so, feature requests would be made obsolete. This would let us request fetures without members derailing the threads.
you want to re-make BF2s.com in your own image, instead of accepting what is already here.
well, D&ST regulars, i give you pace51 - he's left the best for last, apparently . . .
