Yep. An A-10 can kill a tank with only a few short bursts from it's gun.xbrandomx wrote:
Isn't the A-10 referred to as "the tank killer" because of its front mounted gun? I think it'd be awesome to try out in Armored Fury if they get this thing right.GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:
I know what a bomber is dumbass.
I was pointing out how the A10 filled the bomber role in DC, and that a bomber added to BF2 should only be that strong (8 bombs * 2), so that carpet bombing isn't possible.
(if you can't tell... I don't like tanks much after realizing they only restrict possibilities)
about boats, a fast attack vessel like this or hovercrafts would be extremely cool.
There should be "birds", the little heli they had in DC. Fun to fly, fun to shoot down. Would fit perfect on Karkand, 0.5 j/k.
bring back controlable destroyers and ships.

http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/945/jetcar0jf.jpg -Big picture sorry.

My pic of the sr 71 blackbird is to big but i'd like to see that in bf2 as well.
Last edited by jord (2006-04-30 03:07:27)
its imposible to have a plane with the B designation
the plane wouuld have enough room to make a circle around the map and thats about it
wouldnt work in bf2 the maps are WAYYYY to small
i would love to see some mod make some huge maps with a ton of tickets
like BF2 maps are around 2km i would like to see a map that is like 20km in all directions(yes i kno the load time would be HUGE but still think about it massive battles, to bad u cant have more then 64 players)
the plane wouuld have enough room to make a circle around the map and thats about it
wouldnt work in bf2 the maps are WAYYYY to small
i would love to see some mod make some huge maps with a ton of tickets
like BF2 maps are around 2km i would like to see a map that is like 20km in all directions(yes i kno the load time would be HUGE but still think about it massive battles, to bad u cant have more then 64 players)
2 Everybody who wants to see heavy bombers in BF2 : WHERE WILL THEY FLY ? EXACT MAP PLEASE . CARPET BOMBING FROM EACH OF THIS BOMBERS WILL KILL 15-20 PLAYERS AT ONE TIME . WONT IT BE NEW KIND OF STATPADDING ?
They could just make new bigger maps and have bombers in the new maps only
Why should it be free? Every company produces expansion packs of one form or another...Most charge for them. Fine. Make it free. Instead lets pay $30 a month just to play online. Sound better?GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:
DICE/EA will make it shitty. Besides, I refuse to give EA money for content which should be free.
i would like to see thiseagles1106 wrote:
Bf2 could also add naval vessels
Destroyers dammit.
are you kidding me? Go onto a lucky Oman/Dalian/Operation Clean Sweep server when you're on the mainland with a bomber and you've pushed the Americans out. Thats stat padding like crazy as it is. We don't need heavy bombers at allllllll. I think bombing should stay strategical.Longbow wrote:
2 Everybody who wants to see heavy bombers in BF2 : WHERE WILL THEY FLY ? EXACT MAP PLEASE . CARPET BOMBING FROM EACH OF THIS BOMBERS WILL KILL 15-20 PLAYERS AT ONE TIME . WONT IT BE NEW KIND OF STATPADDING ?
you know it would own
The last thing that BF2 needs is more jets, especially stealth ones that can't be locked on to. I can see it now; I'd be playing city maps and SF.
Mechs! Oh wait....
How about a molemachine!!! Aw would be so cool, you can avoid tanks and stuff, and pop up somewhere useful. But you wouldn't be able to go too far underground, like only 1000m or something.
How about a molemachine!!! Aw would be so cool, you can avoid tanks and stuff, and pop up somewhere useful. But you wouldn't be able to go too far underground, like only 1000m or something.
Would actually like to see reconaissance planes like the Blackbird. Maybe if you fly it and use radar on ir for your troops you get a decent amount of points