B-52 Stratofortress?
correct.
it had a passenger, X-51A Waverider - couldn't see it in that pic so i'll let my turn end . . .
it had a passenger, X-51A Waverider - couldn't see it in that pic so i'll let my turn end . . .
I adore B-52's, their my favorite bomber.
CloseUser007Gamer wrote:
Soko J-22?
A different variant or export version?M.O.A.B wrote:
CloseUser007Gamer wrote:
Soko J-22?
sepecat jaguar l3pace51 wrote:
I adore B-52's, their my favorite bomber.
http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http … s%3Disch:1
Yeah.Aries_37 wrote:
sepecat jaguar l3pace51 wrote:
I adore B-52's, their my favorite bomber.
http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http … s%3Disch:1
Same aircraft, but manufactured by a seperate country and company.pace51 wrote:
A different variant or export version?M.O.A.B wrote:
CloseUser007Gamer wrote:
Soko J-22?
IAR-93 Vulture?
i think pace is right but he posts WAY TOO MUCH so I will post for him and besides he loves the plane in this picture:
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
B-52 "Old Dog" thank you Dale Brown
correct
technically according to the books it is EB-52I Megafortress of which the 'Old Dog' was the first.
technically according to the books it is EB-52I Megafortress of which the 'Old Dog' was the first.
Last edited by Stubbee (2010-05-27 10:44:20)
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
If Ted's around, he can posy in my place........ off to work
Isn't he banned? If he is, I'll post in his honour. Which would piss him off. Sorry, ted.Karbin wrote:
If Ted's around, he can posy in my place........ off to work
without seeing the picture my guess is YF-17 ( all i see is a wall of text)pace51 wrote:
http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http … s%3Disch:1
RWF: YF-17 lost to the F-16 prototype but was considered such a good design it became the F-18
Last edited by Stubbee (2010-05-27 11:10:36)
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
Correctumundo.Stubbee wrote:
without seeing the picture my guess is YF-17pace51 wrote:
http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http … s%3Disch:1
RWF: YF-17 lost to the F-16 prototype but was considered such a good design it became the F-18
Vultur, but it is yes.pace51 wrote:
IAR-93 Vulture?
Yes! Thank you hungarian heritage (Also inherited a hungarian annoyance at every surrounding country stealing land from us/occupying us, grrr romania and GRRR russia)M.O.A.B wrote:
Vultur, but it is yes.pace51 wrote:
IAR-93 Vulture?
I swear you're dumb as shit. All people have to do is click on the link to see the name of the plane. Use tinypic you imbecile.
And by yeah, you mean no? There's no such thing as a SEPECAT Jaguar L3, or a Jaguar L-anything. That's a Jaguar GR.3.pace51 wrote:
Yeah.Aries_37 wrote:
sepecat jaguar l3pace51 wrote:
I adore B-52's, their my favorite bomber.
http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http … s%3Disch:1
THE l3 WAS AN EMOTICONk30dxedle wrote:
And by yeah, you mean no? There's no such thing as a SEPECAT Jaguar L3, or a Jaguar L-anything. That's a Jaguar GR.3.pace51 wrote:
Yeah.Aries_37 wrote:
sepecat jaguar l3
Keep it going...
Name and exact variant, please.
Name and exact variant, please.
Well, hrm. Can I use my Phone-a-friend, Regis?User007Gamer wrote:
Keep it going...
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/4637/cheaterh.jpg
Name and exact variant, please.
Paging USMarine...
Yes, lifelines are allowed.