BF2S Forums As if there were no proof before....leeches get a bonus.

Varegg wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Yeah ... that's it ... population size matters when balancing a budget ...

Having a few small dense cities compared to the HUGE land mass of the US, ranging from metropolis' to small towns.

One thing I can give credit to Finland is that they have a really good education system.

Sweden still relies maybe not on oil, but an energy sector that keeps its economy afloat.

If a country is so well built, there wouldn't be need for welfare at all. How many of you Euros love going to America to buy shit that costs half as much?

What energy sector in Sweden are you reffering to?

The Swedish  economy is a developed mixed economy, aided by timber, hydropower  and iron ore. These constitute the resource base of an economy oriented toward foreign trade. The main industries include motor vehicles, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals and forestry.

Well let me correct myself, I mean resource base economy. China needs that steel...

Your economy right now doesn't look that good... And hell comparing to the US PER CAPITA, you still lag at least 10 grand behind.

Varreg: Balancing a budget for a HUGE nation like the US is a lot different than a country with one ethnic makeup with a lot smaller population.

Best way to control a society is to take all its wealth and redistribute it.

Cybargs wrote:

Varreg: Balancing a budget for a HUGE nation like the US is a lot different than a country with one ethnic makeup with a lot smaller population.

WTF Does ethnicity have to do with balancing a budget?

Dilbert_X wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Varreg: Balancing a budget for a HUGE nation like the US is a lot different than a country with one ethnic makeup with a lot smaller population.

WTF Does ethnicity have to do with balancing a budget?

How much do you think the war on drugs is costing the federal gov?

Varreg: For illegal aliens they get free shit coz they can run to the ER with a fake ID and never get billed. Their kids can stay in public schools because "HUR DUR OGMS YOU ARE RACIALISTS" illegal immigrant sympathizers will bitch and moan if they kick illegal kids out of schools.

Last edited by Cybargs (2010-05-27 06:44:34)

Dilbert_X wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

WTF Does ethnicity have to do with balancing a budget?

How much do you think the war on drugs is costing the federal gov?

I didn't know it was only coloureds taking drugs, thanks for enlightening me.

Ethnic tensions pretty much always lead to crime.

Why do you think all the Asian kids are in gangs and selling shit to white kids in Canada and Aus?

Varegg wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

WTF Does ethnicity have to do with balancing a budget?

How much do you think the war on drugs is costing the federal gov?

Varreg: For illegal aliens they get free shit coz they can run to the ER with a fake ID and never get billed. Their kids can stay in public schools because "HUR DUR OGMS YOU ARE RACIALISTS" illegal immigrant sympathizers will bitch and moan if they kick illegal kids out of schools.

And you guys calls us entitled and appeasing ... hypocritical tbh

Hey last I check if you don't have health insurance card in Taiwan good luck brah

But yeah border states suck dick with illegal immigration.

11 Bravo wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

How much do you think the war on drugs is costing the federal gov?

Varreg: For illegal aliens they get free shit coz they can run to the ER with a fake ID and never get billed. Their kids can stay in public schools because "HUR DUR OGMS YOU ARE RACIALISTS" illegal immigrant sympathizers will bitch and moan if they kick illegal kids out of schools.

And you guys calls us entitled and appeasing ... hypocritical tbh

you are though.  we entitle people who need it.  you guys coddle everyone....except darkies.

Even Asians love darkies. Every times theres a black guy all the Asian bitches think he's kobe.

lowing wrote:

ruisleipa wrote:

lowing wrote:

yup we did, and where did you miss the fact that people that get unemployed go on unemployment insurance,not welfare.

I realise there is a difference but are you saying no-one who is unemployed is on welfare? Surely not true. Or, if they are working, then they pay taxes, but earn shit money, so in effect they get some taxes back don't they, if they also receive some welfare checks to help 'em out. Like the people in this article as I understand it.

poor people pay no taxes.

I am speaking generally, I do not know every unemployed person in the US or their financial status. I can say EVERYONE I know that have had good jobs went on unemployment until they find other jobs, NOT welfare

So poor people pay no taxes. Pretty sure "poor" people in the US still pay all the taxes you do. Save for employment taxes. They still pay taxes on the things they buy. They pay property taxes for their landlord. You get to claim these things as you paying taxes, yet they don't get the credit?

As far as welfare v unemployment. I know plenty of well to do people that lost their job recently. Don't know any that went on welfare. Why is that? Because when you make over 100 grand a year, you are lucky, and tend to be ABLE to put some aside. I can quarantee you that if they hadn't been ABLE to put some aside, then the 400 bucks unemployment pays would have meant they NEEDED more support. Thank god they were never poor, and were able to do so. How can you expect someone to put away 20% of their earnings to cover rainy days, when their earnings dont even equal their cost of living.

Last edited by nlsme1 (2010-05-27 07:19:45)

lowing wrote:

poor people pay no taxes.

The rich pay a lot less.

Varegg wrote:

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

And yet we spend equal amounts of tax ... what does that tell you?

Already told you what that tells me. YOU sare coddled by govt. from cradle to grave, and we are being robbed.

But what if you could have the same benefits for your share of the taxes you pay?

sorry, govt. dependency makes me cringe. I would rather just be given the freedom for me to choose my life's path. Thanks anyway.

ruisleipa wrote:

lowing wrote:

SOrry, I live in a country where you work for yourself and the sweat of your efforts goes toward your benefit and not someone wno decided work is not for them.

Don't apologise, I don't care, but you should since you seem very unhappy about it. I, on the other hand, am very happy living in Finland, in large part due to the fact that we have such good benefits, a generally content populace, and a pleasant way of life. You seem to be moaning about everything all the time.

DonFck wrote:

If he didn't even vote in the last presidential election..

He didn't? Srsly?

lowing wrote:

Gee, ya think? WHat do you think all of tea party protests and shit is all about? and this govt will be changed.

Not talking about the fucking TEa PArty, I'm talking about YOU. Or are you in the TP?

lowing wrote:

Already told you what that tells me. YOU sare coddled by govt. from craddle to grave, and we are being robbed.

And we are positive societies with a fraction of the problems you have, so maybe you should be 'coddled' as you put it (cos of course no-one here ever works or anything). Or maybe you should spend less on defence (couldn't resist that one).

I am unhappy with govt. hindering my efforts to take care of myself. Unlike you,  I do not need the govt. coddling me. It is not a benefit you enjoy,. It is the theft from anothers efforts you enjoy.


Nope, was out of the country and I live in a "red state". A state that would not go to Obam anyway. I felt secure in that, and I was right.

Nope I do not do protests.

You are also the fraction ofa country we are that has no place on the world stage of influence. Can't spend less on defense, Finland and other like you need protecting, of course when you switch sides it is hard to tell which side you are on, I guess the winning side huh?

lowing wrote:

Can't spend less on defense

LOL

Dilbert_X wrote:

lowing wrote:

sorry, govt. dependency makes me cringe. I would rather just be given the freedom for me to choose my life's path. Thanks anyway.

Thing is, having to pay for healthcare and education you're less free, you're on much more of a treadmill - but you're brainwashed into believing its 'freedom'.

i dont have to pay more than my taxes for healthcare and education.