nope not in this case, and it doesn't to you either, you are just trying to make an argument, it jsut so happens to be an argument that you yourself do not believe either.Spark wrote:
does the phrase correlation does not imply causation mean nothing to you...lowing wrote:
They didn't take to violence BEFORE the cartoons Varegg, and they weren't screaming anything except death to those that print pictures of the prophet. 2 plus 2 does equal 4 ya know.Varegg wrote:
You are the one in denial when you refuse to accept that there could be other underlying issues to why they took to violence ... you say it's because of the cartoons alone yet you have nothing to back it up ...
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/05/ … ammad-day/
damn Pakistani students and not Al Queda terrorists, expressing their desires of death to anyone who draws the prophet...Well, so much for your argument.
Last edited by lowing (2010-05-20 04:49:40)