Vehicles to add to bf2

2006-04-29 22:17:24

#1

eagles1106: Member; +269|7031|Marlton, New Jersey.

Just wanted to know what are some vehicles you would want added to bf2 to...post pics
My 2 picks:

http://www.carbuyersnotebook.com/Toy_Car.jpg <---give those two kids a mounted cap gun and they would own your ass

http://www.hanscomfamily.com/F:A-22.jpg

Last edited by eagles1106 (2006-04-29 22:20:46)

2006-04-29 22:23:44

#2

Capt. Foley: Member; +155|7035|Allentown, PA, USA

i could list a hell of alot but i am limited
AKA the us MARINE CORPS
no russia= well almost every tank plane and chopper i would throw in

2006-04-29 22:26:03

#3

eagles1106: Member; +269|7031|Marlton, New Jersey.

That jeep would really own!

2006-04-29 22:35:37

#4

kessel!: Peruvian Cocaine; +261|7212|Toronto Canada

the mec uses alot of russian stuff.
maps should have multiple branches of each military at the same time. that way, there would be some awesome vehicles.

2006-04-29 22:37:28

#5

eagles1106: Member; +269|7031|Marlton, New Jersey.

Pfft the Russians, my cap gun mounted jeep would pwn the russians any day of the week, and if they needed it my F/A-22 would provide help

2006-04-29 22:38:37

#6

GetOutOfMyTankNoob: Member; +3|7023

BF2 needs a dedicated bomber (like the default A10 in DC). If the USMC has access to Russian weapons (PKM unlock, for one), why can't they have USAF planes?

2006-04-29 22:40:33

#7

eagles1106: Member; +269|7031|Marlton, New Jersey.

The f-15 is a USAF plane...

2006-04-29 22:43:11

#8

eagles1106: Member; +269|7031|Marlton, New Jersey.

I also think it would be cool to have high altitude bombers like the b-2 spirit that can have 1 set of bombs that have huge attack areas, but they would need to resupply by going low which then they would be able to be attacked by fighters, which is why its a good idea. The bomber wouldnt rule the skies forever, they could still be shot down

2006-04-29 22:45:15

#9

GetOutOfMyTankNoob: Member; +3|7023

It's probably a USMC variant, though. The USMC wouldn't have access to a B1B or B2.

The US side could be given a B1B, and the MEC/China side could get a Russian Tu160, which looks similar to the B1B, but is faster.

Last edited by GetOutOfMyTankNoob (2006-04-29 22:47:02)

2006-04-29 22:45:34

#10

VeNg3nCe^: ¦Tactics Øver Principles¦; +314|7153|Antarctica

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:
BF2 needs a dedicated bomber (like the default A10 in DC). If the USMC has access to Russian weapons (PKM unlock, for one), why can't they have USAF planes?

Have you heard of Armored Fury?

2006-04-29 22:46:32

#11

xbrandomx: Member; +9|7097

I think the Stealth series of fighters and bombers should be incorperated.

They shouldn't come up on radar and can't be locked onto... but I do think that they should be a bit slower then any other plane and a little more rusty on the turning radius.

What I honestly REALLY want? is more of that apache longbow in SF seen EVERYWHERE! That thing is amazing.

Last edited by xbrandomx (2006-04-29 22:47:12)

2006-04-29 22:48:46

#12

GetOutOfMyTankNoob: Member; +3|7023

VeNg3nCe^ wrote:
GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:
BF2 needs a dedicated bomber (like the default A10 in DC). If the USMC has access to Russian weapons (PKM unlock, for one), why can't they have USAF planes?
Have you heard of Armored Fury?

DICE/EA will make it shitty. Besides, I refuse to give EA money for content which should be free.

Edit: An F22 would be unfair, since it outperforms every fighter in the world. However, a stealth bomber would not, because they cannot engage other planes.

Last edited by GetOutOfMyTankNoob (2006-04-29 22:50:29)

2006-04-29 22:53:23

#13

Ditsch: Need another Monster; +3|7040|Chandler, Arizona

Why not add bombers into? Like the B-52 or something.

2006-04-29 22:53:26

#14

mcminty: Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.; +879|7169|Sydney, Australia

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:
BF2 needs a dedicated bomber (like the default A10 in DC). If the USMC has access to Russian weapons (PKM unlock, for one), why can't they have USAF planes?

Use the fucking search button...

The expansion pack Armoured Fury will include an arial ground attack class, yes that's right, an A-10.

If you wanted "a dedicated bomber", you would want an aircraft with the B designation, not A.

Eg. A B-52 or a B-2.

As for what I want in the game, what about an AC-130?

https://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/ac-130-dll.jpg

2006-04-29 22:56:03

#15

GetOutOfMyTankNoob: Member; +3|7023

I know what a bomber is dumbass.
I was pointing out how the A10 filled the bomber role in DC, and that a bomber added to BF2 should only be that strong (8 bombs * 2), so that carpet bombing isn't possible.

2006-04-29 23:04:09

#16

InviSniper: The first true Sniper.; +95|7091|Cumberland, MD, USA

Chinook transport helicopter.

Edit: We retired the A-10 guys. With the extrmeme G-force we put on the planes their wings and hulls developed stress cracks which would take more money to replace than just to scrap the plane. We have a small program to fix some, but it's not big. A-10 will be ancient history in 10 years.

Last edited by InviSniper (2006-04-29 23:05:51)

2006-04-29 23:05:24

#17

eagles1106: Member; +269|7031|Marlton, New Jersey.

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:
VeNg3nCe^ wrote:
GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:
BF2 needs a dedicated bomber (like the default A10 in DC). If the USMC has access to Russian weapons (PKM unlock, for one), why can't they have USAF planes?
Have you heard of Armored Fury?
DICE/EA will make it shitty. Besides, I refuse to give EA money for content which should be free.

Edit: An F22 would be unfair, since it outperforms every fighter in the world. However, a stealth bomber would not, because they cannot engage other planes.

Actually an F22 wouldnt outpreform other planes when it comes to manueverability at least...maybe beats it in stealth and armaments, but a better manuevering fighter...

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/su37_02.jpg

check these out http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … mp;pl=true

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … mp;pl=true

2006-04-29 23:07:18

#18

eagles1106: Member; +269|7031|Marlton, New Jersey.

Actually in terms of bf2 the f22 wouldnt own even if it would in real life because dice makes everything in the game equal in military strenth because if it were real life like the us would win every battle...notice how they dont make the f35 undetectable to radar when it actually is in real life...dice needs to equalize military preformance in the game, which they do

Last edited by eagles1106 (2006-04-29 23:11:32)

2006-04-29 23:10:56

#19

eagles1106: Member; +269|7031|Marlton, New Jersey.

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:
It's probably a USMC variant, though. The USMC wouldn't have access to a B1B or B2.

The US side could be given a B1B, and the MEC/China side could get a Russian Tu160, which looks similar to the B1B, but is faster.

doesnt have to be a USMC variant...notice how the USMC have an f15 and thats not a variant...

2006-04-29 23:41:30

#20

eagles1106: Member; +269|7031|Marlton, New Jersey.

Bf2 could also add naval vessels

2006-04-30 00:54:28

#21

Defiance: Member; +438|7118

Yeah, some decent boats would be cool.

The RIB is good for transport, but the M249 on it isn't very effective. A .50 cal MG would be better if not a whole new boat.

Last edited by Defiance (2006-04-30 00:55:09)

2006-04-30 01:22:44

#22

leesupport: Member; +39|7130

that would be great to have a little better boats or small ships

2006-04-30 01:48:33

#23

persnickadee: Member; +0|7108

mcminty wrote:
GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:
BF2 needs a dedicated bomber (like the default A10 in DC). If the USMC has access to Russian weapons (PKM unlock, for one), why can't they have USAF planes?
Use the fucking search button...

The expansion pack Armoured Fury will include an arial ground attack class, yes that's right, an A-10.

If you wanted "a dedicated bomber", you would want an aircraft with the B designation, not A.

Eg. A B-52 or a B-2.

As for what I want in the game, what about an AC-130?

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/ac-130-dll.jpg

hellyea

2006-04-30 01:52:16

#24

Stephen_Sung_811007: Member; +4|7147|Taiwan

why dont u add a lambroghini gallarado and a porsche 911turbo while youre at it

2006-04-30 02:13:33

#25

xbrandomx: Member; +9|7097

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:
I know what a bomber is dumbass.
I was pointing out how the A10 filled the bomber role in DC, and that a bomber added to BF2 should only be that strong (8 bombs * 2), so that carpet bombing isn't possible.

Isn't the A-10 referred to as "the tank killer" because of its front mounted gun? I think it'd be awesome to try out in Armored Fury if they get this thing right.

(if you can't tell... I don't like tanks much after realizing they only restrict possibilities)

BF2S Forums Vehicles to add to bf2

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:

VeNg3nCe^ wrote:

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:

VeNg3nCe^ wrote:

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:

mcminty wrote:

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:

GetOutOfMyTankNoob wrote:

Board footer