Can't smack a motherfucker on video conference.Uzique wrote:
eh what's new . . .
jetting all the world leaders around to various luxury hotels and conference centres for 'crisis talks' on 'climate change'.
21st century and the world's elite can't use video conferencing? i know it's not diplomatic, but still- there's always lots of taxpayer (and climate too, if you will) costs for a whole load of nothing. summits and meetings, in a skeptical sense, are not a lot more than exercises of power - the big cats getting together to smoke some cigars and dick around on golf courses, more concerned with the finer scotch than nuclear disarmament.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- G20- Will things get done or will things get smashed?
Ummmm, the SPP, NAFTA, etc etc....Cybargs wrote:
Yeah like it's plausible to get the consent of Canadians, Mexicans and Americans to form one big country.LostFate wrote:
you don't believe it, North American Union?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Yes he said it, but you believed it.
Yes I also realize G. Brown is no longer PM of Britain, but that was the last G20 summit so I figured it was relevant.
Anarchists are allowed to form groups and organize large events? Isnt that against what they stand for?
its kinda like emoWinston_Churchill wrote:
Anarchists are allowed to form groups and organize large events? Isnt that against what they stand for?
they think they are all individuals ........ that they think the same, dress the same, wear their hair the same, look the same but they're all individuals
Last edited by SEREMAKER (2010-05-19 08:07:40)
NAFTA =/= merging into one country. It's a freaking FTA. That's like saying the EU is one country now. Same logic could be applied to APEC/ASEAN countries too =.=SonderKommando wrote:
Ummmm, the SPP, NAFTA, etc etc....Cybargs wrote:
Yeah like it's plausible to get the consent of Canadians, Mexicans and Americans to form one big country.LostFate wrote:
you don't believe it, North American Union?
Yes I also realize G. Brown is no longer PM of Britain, but that was the last G20 summit so I figured it was relevant.
You're forgetting the fact that they're retards. This means they're actually exactly the same as all the capitalist pigs they hate; try count the number of pairs of Converse you see in the crowds!Winston_Churchill wrote:
Anarchists are allowed to form groups and organize large events? Isnt that against what they stand for?
Don't piss off the cops:
Reminds me of HL2 lulz
Reminds me of HL2 lulz
Last edited by Hurricane2k9 (2010-05-19 08:14:27)
![https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg](https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg)
anarchism as a political school and ideology can collectivize; they do have shared ideals and shared 'goals', as such. anarchism is not nihilism. they don't just want to destroy everything, fuck all authority and then sit back and smoke a doobie. actual, proper anarchism is a fairly thought-out little philosophy. they can organize into groups, not only for political pragmatism, but also because anarchism champions syndicalism. people that shit talk anarchists are the ignorant, fat shit american capitalists that turned a blind-eye when sacco and vanzetti were killed for no reason. the people that gossiped amongst their little suburbs when the rosenbergs were murdered. they're morons and will never understand systems or ideologies that arent compatible with shopping malls and saving up for a new buick.Winston_Churchill wrote:
Anarchists are allowed to form groups and organize large events? Isnt that against what they stand for?
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
large groups =/= state or government is essentially what Uzique is saying.Uzique wrote:
anarchism as a political school and ideology can collectivize; they do have shared ideals and shared 'goals', as such. anarchism is not nihilism. they don't just want to destroy everything, fuck all authority and then sit back and smoke a doobie. actual, proper anarchism is a fairly thought-out little philosophy. they can organize into groups, not only for political pragmatism, but also because anarchism champions syndicalism. people that shit talk anarchists are the ignorant, fat shit american capitalists that turned a blind-eye when sacco and vanzetti were killed for no reason. the people that gossiped amongst their little suburbs when the rosenbergs were murdered. they're morons and will never understand systems or ideologies that arent compatible with shopping malls and saving up for a new buick.Winston_Churchill wrote:
Anarchists are allowed to form groups and organize large events? Isnt that against what they stand for?
SEREMAKER wrote:
I could have fun there
get up on the mic in front of everyone ......... " fuck you russia " " fuck you china " " fuck you middle east " ..................... " SERE OOOOOUUUUTTTTT "
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- G20- Will things get done or will things get smashed?