That's bullshit. With student aid you can put yourself through college on minimum wage without incurring significant debt. That's all you need to get out of the poor house.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
The system is designed to keep poor people poor. Blacks have always had a higher percentage of poor people, so they will be kept poor.
On average, this is how the system functions. That's not to say that the system is fully to blame or even the majority of why someone remains poor, but it is just by sheer human nature that wealth tends to accumulate at the top -- whereas the poor usually stay poor.JohnG@lt wrote:
Umm... no.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
The system is designed to keep poor people poor. Blacks have always had a higher percentage of poor people, so they will be kept poor.
It takes a lot more effort, intelligence, and sheer luck to go from rags to riches rather than to go from wealthy to much more wealthy.
It takes more than just that, but that certainly helps.mikkel wrote:
That's bullshit. With student aid you can put yourself through college on minimum wage without incurring significant debt. That's all you need to get out of the poor house.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
The system is designed to keep poor people poor. Blacks have always had a higher percentage of poor people, so they will be kept poor.
Last edited by Turquoise (2010-05-17 19:57:29)
I know rite lol... yeah too bad our forums are not that diverse so we get both sides of the coin, its mostly composed of Caucasian people..... otherwise the forums would be brewing with arguments...FatherTed wrote:
this will end well
lol.....some euro countries are as white as snow...yet they they and talk shit. loljsnipy wrote:
White people in Finland are probably many times richer than blacks
there're hardly any black people in Finland. Your point? Oh, you don't have one.jsnipy wrote:
White people in Finland are probably many times richer than blacks
thank you for your unhelpful contribution.mikkel wrote:
My thoughts? These high-income black Americans apparently weren't very good at managing their wealth. No doubt because of whitey.
Your post was childish and dumb. I can expect a rational thread if people like you don't post dumb-ass ignorant comments.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Not if the fucking article makes me roll my eyes partway in. You can't expect a 'rational' thread when you're throwing childish insults around in it.
There is truth in this.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
The system is designed to keep poor people poor. Blacks have always had a higher percentage of poor people, so they will be kept poor.
What a dumb comment.Cybargs wrote:
Gee I don't know, how about getting a college degree and not trying to be 50 cent for the whole damn day, maybe then they could get back at whitey.
True, rather than discussing it in a level-headed manner the white folk here (probably everyone tbh) get their pants in a twist and take shit personally. Barely one person has actually commented on the article rather than posting some shit '50 cent' or 'whitey' comment.blademaster wrote:
I know rite lol... yeah too bad our forums are not that diverse so we get both sides of the coin, its mostly composed of Caucasian people..... otherwise the forums would be brewing with arguments...
Pretty fucking pathetic tbh.
Unhelpful contribution? Perhaps you could explain why the study shows that high-income black people do a worse job of managing their wealth than mid-income white people do, without yourself resorting to arguing that whitey came and took the money out of their pockets.ruisleipa wrote:
thank you for your unhelpful contribution.mikkel wrote:
My thoughts? These high-income black Americans apparently weren't very good at managing their wealth. No doubt because of whitey.
...
Barely one person has actually commented on the article rather than posting some shit '50 cent' or 'whitey' comment.
Easy for a person who lives in a country full of one race to say shit about a multicultural nation. It's simple why blacks earn or have less: they don't value education. Try getting a job with only a high school degree (black dropout rates are high too), and you can bet your ass it's not a very good one.ruisleipa wrote:
there're hardly any black people in Finland. Your point? Oh, you don't have one.jsnipy wrote:
White people in Finland are probably many times richer than blacksthank you for your unhelpful contribution.mikkel wrote:
My thoughts? These high-income black Americans apparently weren't very good at managing their wealth. No doubt because of whitey.Your post was childish and dumb. I can expect a rational thread if people like you don't post dumb-ass ignorant comments.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Not if the fucking article makes me roll my eyes partway in. You can't expect a 'rational' thread when you're throwing childish insults around in it.There is truth in this.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
The system is designed to keep poor people poor. Blacks have always had a higher percentage of poor people, so they will be kept poor.What a dumb comment.Cybargs wrote:
Gee I don't know, how about getting a college degree and not trying to be 50 cent for the whole damn day, maybe then they could get back at whitey.True, rather than discussing it in a level-headed manner the white folk here (probably everyone tbh) get their pants in a twist and take shit personally. Barely one person has actually commented on the article rather than posting some shit '50 cent' or 'whitey' comment.blademaster wrote:
I know rite lol... yeah too bad our forums are not that diverse so we get both sides of the coin, its mostly composed of Caucasian people..... otherwise the forums would be brewing with arguments...
Pretty fucking pathetic tbh.
yes, unhelpful because you resort to the ridiculous use of language like 'whitey' to dismiss research that might be accurate. You'll notice I'm sure that I never 'resorted to arguing' anything. I merely asked for people's opinions. Which you'd know if you'd bother reading the post.mikkel wrote:
Unhelpful contribution? Perhaps you could explain why the study shows that high-income black people do a worse job of managing their wealth than mid-income white people do, without yourself resorting to arguing that whitey came and took the money out of their pockets.
wtf are you talking about. Why are guys getting so fucking paranoid. I didn't say shit about any nation. I didn't 'insult' your beloved America. I just posted an article about some research. you failed to comment on the research and got all touchy. nice to see you got a good line in racism as well.Cybargs wrote:
Easy for a person who lives in a country full of one race to say shit about a multicultural nation. It's simple why blacks earn or have less: they don't value education. Try getting a job with only a high school degree (black dropout rates are high too), and you can bet your ass it's not a very good one.
FYI I lived in London for 20 years so I know about multicultural society thanks.
Yeah, you asked for my opinion, I gave it to you, and then you claimed that it was unhelpful. If you want opinions, that's fine, but if you're going to take shots at those opinions, and then go hide behind a claimed intent that you betrayed in action, then please take your nonsense elsewhere.ruisleipa wrote:
yes, unhelpful because you resort to the ridiculous use of language like 'whitey' to dismiss research that might be accurate. You'll notice I'm sure that I never 'resorted to arguing' anything. I merely asked for people's opinions. Which you'd know if you'd bother reading the post.mikkel wrote:
Unhelpful contribution? Perhaps you could explain why the study shows that high-income black people do a worse job of managing their wealth than mid-income white people do, without yourself resorting to arguing that whitey came and took the money out of their pockets.
Look at you, flailing around with quotes like a panicked octopus. Insult people some more, sparky.ruisleipa wrote:
there're hardly any black people in Finland. Your point? Oh, you don't have one.jsnipy wrote:
White people in Finland are probably many times richer than blacksthank you for your unhelpful contribution.mikkel wrote:
My thoughts? These high-income black Americans apparently weren't very good at managing their wealth. No doubt because of whitey.Your post was childish and dumb. I can expect a rational thread if people like you don't post dumb-ass ignorant comments.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Not if the fucking article makes me roll my eyes partway in. You can't expect a 'rational' thread when you're throwing childish insults around in it.There is truth in this.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
The system is designed to keep poor people poor. Blacks have always had a higher percentage of poor people, so they will be kept poor.What a dumb comment.Cybargs wrote:
Gee I don't know, how about getting a college degree and not trying to be 50 cent for the whole damn day, maybe then they could get back at whitey.True, rather than discussing it in a level-headed manner the white folk here (probably everyone tbh) get their pants in a twist and take shit personally. Barely one person has actually commented on the article rather than posting some shit '50 cent' or 'whitey' comment.blademaster wrote:
I know rite lol... yeah too bad our forums are not that diverse so we get both sides of the coin, its mostly composed of Caucasian people..... otherwise the forums would be brewing with arguments...
Pretty fucking pathetic tbh.
your comment was unhelpful because of this:mikkel wrote:
Yeah, you asked for my opinion, I gave it to you, and then you claimed that it was unhelpful. If you want opinions, that's fine, but if you're going to take shots at those opinions, and then go hide behind a claimed intent that you betrayed in action, then please take your nonsense elsewhere.
Is that REALLY your opinion? If it is, it's nonsensical as it stands, unles you'd like to explain exactly what/who you mean by 'whitey'. I dunno wtf you're talking about claimed intent and betrayed action. woteva.mikkel wrote:
No doubt because of whitey.
lmfao dear oh dear.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Look at you, flailing around with quotes like a panicked octopus. Insult people some more, sparky.
One slant to this could be that black families havn't had much time to collect meaningful assets. I mean the 60's were only 50 years ago yes? So two generations... i'm due to inherit a boat load from my grandparents and parents, i assume the majority of black familys don't have that to build on.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
A lot of factories that employed a load of blacks during WW2 moved and had a shitload more of white labour competing against blacks. Right now there are a shitload of federal programs to aid blacks... shit it's pretty easy to get college aid and get into a college if you're black.FatherTed wrote:
One slant to this could be that black families havn't had much time to collect meaningful assets. I mean the 60's were only 50 years ago yes? So two generations... i'm due to inherit a boat load from my grandparents and parents, i assume the majority of black familys don't have that to build on.
i was thinking more of the social implications. youre average black kid from harlem probably isn't going to want to go to college, he's a product of his surroundings. So my thinking was that when you see more black familys have stable homes in a nice suburb for a generation or two, eventually they'll become a product of their surroundings, and choose to prosper.
edit- posting from eve, sorry for sloppy spelling and grammar
edit- posting from eve, sorry for sloppy spelling and grammar
Last edited by FatherTed (2010-05-18 02:14:37)
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Yeah, I was going to say.. a quarter of African Americans don't have a house, a car, or anything of any real value?Turquoise wrote:
The only thing I object to about this article is that it seems to regard financial assets as the only important ones. Property should have been figured into this report.
Projekts, born and raised.mcminty wrote:
Yeah, I was going to say.. a quarter of African Americans don't have a house, a car, or anything of any real value?Turquoise wrote:
The only thing I object to about this article is that it seems to regard financial assets as the only important ones. Property should have been figured into this report.
And their man in the WH is about to plus up the estate tax to ensure any inheritance they may have built up goes to their Uncle Sugar.FatherTed wrote:
One slant to this could be that black families havn't had much time to collect meaningful assets. I mean the 60's were only 50 years ago yes? So two generations... i'm due to inherit a boat load from my grandparents and parents, i assume the majority of black familys don't have that to build on.
It's fairly easy to get free money for college if you have the grades and your family is poor. It's fairly difficult if your family isn't poor enough. You end up with tons of debt via student loans.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
It's actually easier for black kids and native americans to get scholarships compared to white and asians.FEOS wrote:
And their man in the WH is about to plus up the estate tax to ensure any inheritance they may have built up goes to their Uncle Sugar.FatherTed wrote:
One slant to this could be that black families havn't had much time to collect meaningful assets. I mean the 60's were only 50 years ago yes? So two generations... i'm due to inherit a boat load from my grandparents and parents, i assume the majority of black familys don't have that to build on.
It's fairly easy to get free money for college if you have the grades and your family is poor. It's fairly difficult if your family isn't poor enough. You end up with tons of debt via student loans.
And this, as well.Cybargs wrote:
It's actually easier for black kids and native americans to get scholarships compared to white and asians.FEOS wrote:
And their man in the WH is about to plus up the estate tax to ensure any inheritance they may have built up goes to their Uncle Sugar.FatherTed wrote:
One slant to this could be that black families havn't had much time to collect meaningful assets. I mean the 60's were only 50 years ago yes? So two generations... i'm due to inherit a boat load from my grandparents and parents, i assume the majority of black familys don't have that to build on.
It's fairly easy to get free money for college if you have the grades and your family is poor. It's fairly difficult if your family isn't poor enough. You end up with tons of debt via student loans.
If a black kid has the grades, they'll get money for college, assuming they are lower middle class or lower.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
They get a lot of blacks only merit based scholarships. It's also not that hard to apply for need base... My friend who got into UC Irvine recieved over 20k USD in scholarships from the State lol... It was both merit and need base but he's pretty well off =/ So yeah scholarships aren't taht hard to get...FEOS wrote:
And this, as well.Cybargs wrote:
It's actually easier for black kids and native americans to get scholarships compared to white and asians.FEOS wrote:
And their man in the WH is about to plus up the estate tax to ensure any inheritance they may have built up goes to their Uncle Sugar.
It's fairly easy to get free money for college if you have the grades and your family is poor. It's fairly difficult if your family isn't poor enough. You end up with tons of debt via student loans.
If a black kid has the grades, they'll get money for college, assuming they are lower middle class or lower.
Ergh, I was looking at old stats and comparing the thread title. Clearly waking up at 2:30am and working through till 8pm does weird things to my head.DesertFox- wrote:
What our colleague was referring to was that $2,000 x 5 =/= $100,000Jaekus wrote:
Unsurpassed reading of tongue-in-cheek comments.mikkel wrote:
Unsurpassed mathematical prowess.
Actually, that is my point. Go look for for more trolling articlesruisleipa wrote:
there're hardly any black people in Finland.jsnipy wrote:
White people in Finland are probably many times richer than blacks
Hey!Look at you, flailing around with quotes like a panicked octopus. Insult people some more, sparky.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman