Still miss those click together toys that were in the Frosties boxes....
Fuck Israel
banning tabacco sponsoring from formula one racing is not going to stop smoking entirely just as banning toys from being sold along with unhealthy food is not going to revert every obese child back to normal in a flashunnamednewbie13 wrote:
Look around, kids still smoke.Uzique wrote:
guys i think the law targets the kind of 'evil marketing' and cheap tactics more so than aiming to enforce any sort of dietary regime.
kind of like banning the tobacco industry from sponsoring formula one racing.
you're free to eat what you want but they just dont want companies using any form of subliminal or questionable methods to sell their calorific feasts
well no shit, but that's caused by a lot of factors and societal influencesunnamednewbie13 wrote:
Look around, kids still smoke.Uzique wrote:
guys i think the law targets the kind of 'evil marketing' and cheap tactics more so than aiming to enforce any sort of dietary regime.
kind of like banning the tobacco industry from sponsoring formula one racing.
you're free to eat what you want but they just dont want companies using any form of subliminal or questionable methods to sell their calorific feasts
It's not dishonest marketing. You're getting a greasy cheeseburger, greasy salty fries and a toy. No amount of fluff McD puts on it can avert sensible eyes from that fact and if people choose to ignore that, chances are their diet is already far gone with all the junk food they get from the freaking grocery store.Uzique wrote:
well no shit, but that's caused by a lot of factors and societal influencesunnamednewbie13 wrote:
Look around, kids still smoke.Uzique wrote:
guys i think the law targets the kind of 'evil marketing' and cheap tactics more so than aiming to enforce any sort of dietary regime.
kind of like banning the tobacco industry from sponsoring formula one racing.
you're free to eat what you want but they just dont want companies using any form of subliminal or questionable methods to sell their calorific feasts
surely striking dishonest marketing off the list of evils is a start?
dont be stupid about it because you're in some weird american patriot mode. the logic behind this ban is obvious and there is a benefit.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2010-04-29 19:18:35)
Kids are hardly sensible. All they see is the toy and that's reason enough for them to want to get the Happy Meal. And what with parents being soft-hearted 'friends of children' nowadays, you end up with kids eating crappy food and not giving a shit because they have a fancy new toy to play with for 5 minutes.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
It's not dishonest marketing. You're getting a greasy cheeseburger, greasy salty fries and a toy. No amount of fluff McD puts on it can avert sensible eyes from that fact and if people choose to ignore that, chances are their diet is already far gone with all the junk food they get from the freaking grocery store.
Edit: Anyone see the EA Games unlocks on Dr. Pepper bottles?
No, if the parent fails, the kid fails, if the kid fails they don't pass on their genes and the bloodline dies. It's not the governments fucking job to step in and tell people how they should run their lives. Fuck you for actually believing that it should.Tetrino wrote:
Kids are hardly sensible. All they see is the toy and that's reason enough for them to want to get the Happy Meal. And what with parents being soft-hearted 'friends of children' nowadays, you end up with kids eating crappy food and not giving a shit because they have a fancy new toy to play with for 5 minutes.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
It's not dishonest marketing. You're getting a greasy cheeseburger, greasy salty fries and a toy. No amount of fluff McD puts on it can avert sensible eyes from that fact and if people choose to ignore that, chances are their diet is already far gone with all the junk food they get from the freaking grocery store.
Edit: Anyone see the EA Games unlocks on Dr. Pepper bottles?
Dietary needs are not a child's priority, therefore the parent is responsible for ensuring the child eats healthily. And when the parent fails, someone has to step in.
Marlo Stanfield wrote:
The sick are the greatest danger for the healthy; it is not from the strongest that harm comes to the strong, but from the weakest.
CC-Marley wrote:
Is there logic behind an illegals ban???
I ask in all seriousness, wtf is this thread about?Hurricane2k9 wrote:
The cops in Santa Clara County carry two loaded M4A1 rifles in every squad car, it's
Followed by fm's spam...DonFck wrote:
Your post is considered spam. Please refrain from posting that kind of content. {quote}Marlo Stanfield wrote:
The sick are the greatest danger for the healthy; it is not from the strongest that harm comes to the strong, but from the weakest.
Flaming_Maniac wrote:
as the OP is clearly a violation of rights and general idiocy, the intelligence of my post will reflect that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGqy-1cfqeI#t=4m32s
oh please shut up. talk about reductio ad absurdum. your post fails hard.JohnG@lt wrote:
While we're at it, let's take away all responsibility for the parents. Lets take all children born and place them in state run orphanages where they will receive the prescribed amount of hugs per day, are given equal amounts of food, are all given a uniform to wear so that no one can make fun of their clothing, equal access to education, health care and time with a psychologist to root out their antisocial behavior. Lets take it one step further and genetically engineer all children so they have the same IQ, the same skin color and are the same size so that no one is bullied, no one does better in class than anyone else and no one can be stereotyped based on the color of their skin. Fuck it, lets just neuter everyone at birth and instead of producing children the old fashioned way, we'll just clone the perfect specimens, one male, one female, and not have to worry about anyone being 'disadvantaged' ever again.
well originally it was about bannig the toys in happy meals, which I thought was a great idea, and some otheres seem warm to the idea too, but then some people like galt seem to think that banning toys from McDs is the first step on the road to a fascist nazi regime brewing a new generation via eugenics or some shit totally unrelated to the original thread, so at this point your guess is as good as mine.ATG wrote:
I ask in all seriousness, wtf is this thread about?
Last edited by ruisleipa (2010-04-30 00:16:31)
If it removes the nag factor then why not?I honestly do NOT see what the problem is with banning these toys. No-one has demonstrated any remotely logical argument as to why the ban should not come into place. They're only made in china plastic shite anyway ffs.
oh come on galt.JohnG@lt wrote:
While we're at it, let's take away all responsibility for the parents. Lets take all children born and place them in state run orphanages where they will receive the prescribed amount of hugs per day, are given equal amounts of food, are all given a uniform to wear so that no one can make fun of their clothing, equal access to education, health care and time with a psychologist to root out their antisocial behavior. Lets take it one step further and genetically engineer all children so they have the same IQ, the same skin color and are the same size so that no one is bullied, no one does better in class than anyone else and no one can be stereotyped based on the color of their skin. Fuck it, lets just neuter everyone at birth and instead of producing children the old fashioned way, we'll just clone the perfect specimens, one male, one female, and not have to worry about anyone being 'disadvantaged' ever again.
sheep flocked all the way to page 311 Bravo wrote:
god people are so stupid. if restaurants had to post what was in their food it would make happy meals look like health food. yay keep being sheep. same thing about the KFC double down. a jalapeno burger from chilis is like eating 3 double downs. dont hear shit about chilis do ya? nope. fail sheep fail.
all info is avail on google. and i cant post proof about the restaurants because they are not required to post them. anyone who cooks or has worked in some "high end" place knows you use aboot 3 cows worth of butter to sauce one piece of chicken. its common sense really.Spark wrote:
tbh without any actual evidence your post just looks like fairly shallow rantings.
Last edited by 11 Bravo (2010-04-30 02:44:05)
Way to attack the messenger.JohnG@lt wrote:
No, if the parent fails, the kid fails, if the kid fails they don't pass on their genes and the bloodline dies. It's not the governments fucking job to step in and tell people how they should run their lives. Fuck you for actually believing that it should.Tetrino wrote:
Kids are hardly sensible. All they see is the toy and that's reason enough for them to want to get the Happy Meal. And what with parents being soft-hearted 'friends of children' nowadays, you end up with kids eating crappy food and not giving a shit because they have a fancy new toy to play with for 5 minutes.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
It's not dishonest marketing. You're getting a greasy cheeseburger, greasy salty fries and a toy. No amount of fluff McD puts on it can avert sensible eyes from that fact and if people choose to ignore that, chances are their diet is already far gone with all the junk food they get from the freaking grocery store.
Edit: Anyone see the EA Games unlocks on Dr. Pepper bottles?
Dietary needs are not a child's priority, therefore the parent is responsible for ensuring the child eats healthily. And when the parent fails, someone has to step in.
If you're going to take that route, let's take it your way. Obviously the parent is the key to a child's upbringing, so let's enforce that by removing the pediatrics department from every hospital. Schools, too. It's the parent's job to educate and nurture the child, how can they delegate that responsibility to others? If the parent screws up, then whoop de doo, bye bye bloodline. Their own problem.JohnG@lt wrote:
While we're at it, let's take away all responsibility for the parents. Lets take all children born and place them in state run orphanages where they will receive the prescribed amount of hugs per day, are given equal amounts of food, are all given a uniform to wear so that no one can make fun of their clothing, equal access to education, health care and time with a psychologist to root out their antisocial behavior. Lets take it one step further and genetically engineer all children so they have the same IQ, the same skin color and are the same size so that no one is bullied, no one does better in class than anyone else and no one can be stereotyped based on the color of their skin. Fuck it, lets just neuter everyone at birth and instead of producing children the old fashioned way, we'll just clone the perfect specimens, one male, one female, and not have to worry about anyone being 'disadvantaged' ever again.
HA!Tetrino wrote:
it's telling corporations how to not boost their product by pandering to the whims of children when the product isn't a merit good.
Depending on the nutritional content. Contrary to popular belief, cereals are more nutritious than the boxes they're packaged in. And I don't know about you, but I'd wager that a bowl of cereal would be better for a child than chicken nuggets and fries.11 Bravo wrote:
HA!Tetrino wrote:
it's telling corporations how to not boost their product by pandering to the whims of children when the product isn't a merit good.
might as well pull most cereal boxes off the shelves then right?
maybe. but, what aboot restaurants that offer the "kids eat free" things? i will bet tons of money that most food at those places are equal to or worse than a happy meal.Tetrino wrote:
Depending on the nutritional content. Contrary to popular belief, cereals are more nutritious than the boxes they're packaged in. And I don't know about you, but I'd wager that a bowl of cereal would be better for a child than chicken nuggets and fries.11 Bravo wrote:
HA!Tetrino wrote:
it's telling corporations how to not boost their product by pandering to the whims of children when the product isn't a merit good.
might as well pull most cereal boxes off the shelves then right?
Last edited by 11 Bravo (2010-04-30 02:59:23)
11 Bravo wrote:
kids are just lazy fucks these days. we had happy meals growing up WITHOUT the nutritional labels and we werent little round balls of shit.