BF2S Forums "How is That a Threat"? South Park creators threatened by US Muslims.

Varegg wrote:

Germany has roughly 5% Muslims and I can't remember them ever staging any terrorist attacks in Germany ... I find that very strange that a violent religion like Islam haven't left Germany in ruins long ago ... very strange indeed ...

blademaster wrote:

u support Finland, even though you live in UK....  we gotta get rid off Finland they are gonna squeal lol
http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/224689

DonFck wrote:

Can someone remind me again why Islamic extremists hate the world?

Marlo Stanfield wrote:

ruisleipa wrote:

Marlo Stanfield wrote:

It's just kinda funny how you're breaching tolerance towards them and your country is 99% white and 99% non-muslim.

why is that funny and what does it have to do with being tolerant?

I lived in the UK for 21 years, mainly in London and Leeds, and there're plenty of ethnic-type folk there. Any better?

The homogenizing of European man... requires a justification: it lies in serving a higher sovereign species that stands upon the former which can raise itself to its task only by doing this. Not merely a Master Race whose sole task is to rule, but a Race with its own sphere of life, with an excess of strength... strong enough to have no need of the tyranny of the virtue-imperative.

ruisleipa wrote:

lowing wrote:

if you wanna make a thread about the crusades,

wy the fuck do you keep going o about the fuckin crusades cos I've never mentioned it. Direct that shit at Uzique. Unless you wanna start talking about hoew the US administration referred to their invasionof Iraq as...a crusade. Fuckin belliegerent Christian fucks.

lowing wrote:

I have a very strong negative opinion about Islam

no shit?

lowing wrote:

and it is justified based on prejudice, crappy media and blog sources, no real idea of what's happening in the world, bigotry and fear. So I will post accordingly.

fixed.

lowing wrote:

Did I say Muslims look like terrorists, or was it terrorists look like Muslims? Either way is correct since the vast majority of terrorists are Muslims.

you said muslims look like terrorists. And of course it matters. There's a difference isn't there.

but actually, lmfao too funny..a couple of posts ago you ask me where you say all (oh sorry, 'the vast majority', so what, 90%? 95%, what? Do you have ANY evidence for that? NO YOU DON'T. You have your own prejudices. That's it.) terrorists are muslims and then you just say it, as well as saying all muslims look like terrorists and vice versa. Wow you're really pulling out all the stops now. Cheers for that.

lowing wrote:

I do not feel I have a misconception of Islam, I read what their laws are about, who they hero worship, and what actions are committed in its name and I feel comfortable in my opinion.

of course you feel comfortable because you have no idea what you're talking about beyond those crappy things you base your views on as listed above.

The funny thing is you are the only one not to see it.

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

lowing wrote:

very true. wanna compare "isolated" incidents now or numbers of extremists? Or how about extent of damage or deaths?

Do you have the numbers?

You make it sound like extreme Christians are hard to find ... and you speak of Muslims like they're all extremists ...

And I have a question for you lowing: Have you ever thought about what makes so many extremists, the reason behind their extreme activity, are some people born with an evil preference or is it formed by the enviroment, if the enviroment is your answer then what made the enviroment what it is and before answering that you may also consider history as part of that ...

you make it sound like Islam is not the headliner of terrorism in the world today. Plenty of websites out there ringing up the numbers if you really wanna know. I will not post them because all you will do is dismiss them as biased. but remember you asked so if you want to know, really. You can look them up.

Already answered this. I am not going to try and rationalize and justify the blowing up of their own people let alone anyone else by Islamic terrorists.

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Islam is more tolerant and non violent than it is intolerant and violent ... much like most religions tbh ...

Wrong, Muslims may be by way of choosing to ignore certain aspects of Islams teachings. But Islam itself as it is written and taught, is not tolerant or non-violent.

Varegg wrote:

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Islam is more tolerant and non violent than it is intolerant and violent ... much like most religions tbh ...

Wrong, Muslims may be by way of choosing to ignore certain aspects of Islams teachings. But Islam itself as it is written and taught, is not tolerant or non-violent.

So you finally got to read the Quran seing as you know this?

What % of the Quran is violent and intolerant?

DonFck wrote:

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Islam is more tolerant and non violent than it is intolerant and violent ... much like most religions tbh ...

Wrong, Muslims may be by way of choosing to ignore certain aspects of Islams teachings. But Islam itself as it is written and taught, is not tolerant or non-violent.

Idiots are those who live their lives entirely by the teachings of a "Holy Script". Or do you, as a Christian (I'm presuming you are) honestly believe Jesus walked on water and turned water into wine? If your answer is no, then what do you think most Muslims think about the great deeds of Mohammad the Prophet?

lowing wrote:

This is true, now all you have to do is try and argue that Islam is not violent and intolerant as it is written and taught by Muhammad as well as by its laws.