This is what child services are for. Looks like she's created a great start for an orphanage.
This is also one of the few cases where sterilization is justified.
This is also one of the few cases where sterilization is justified.
Something I heard suggested over here recently, which personally I thought was a great idea, but womens rights campaigners were horrified by, is the idea of sterilising teenage girls between the ages of 13 and 16. To me that sounds like a great way of cutting teen pregnancy.Turquoise wrote:
This is what child services are for. Looks like she's created a great start for an orphanage.
This is also one of the few cases where sterilization is justified.
(bit unrelated, but your post reminded me of it for some reason)
Last edited by Bertster7 (2010-04-23 12:42:09)
But then what? we have 13 kids leeching off the system to repeat the same shit their mom did?
I say make them start working coal mines.
I say make them start working coal mines.
Not necessarily. If they have someone other than their mother to use as a role model, they might actually amount to something.cpt.fass1 wrote:
But then what? we have 13 kids leeching off the system to repeat the same shit their mom did?
I say make them start working coal mines.
sterilise boys instead ffs.Bertster7 wrote:
sterilising teenage girls
lol.. me and my sis were tossing around that idea after discussing this story.Bertster7 wrote:
Something I heard suggested over here recently, which personally I thought was a great idea, but womens rights campaigners were horrified by, is the idea of sterilising teenage girls between the ages of 13 and 16. To me that sounds like a great way of cutting teen pregnancy.Turquoise wrote:
This is what child services are for. Looks like she's created a great start for an orphanage.
This is also one of the few cases where sterilization is justified.
(bit unrelated, but your post reminded me of it for some reason)
Xbone Stormsurgezz
That's a stupid suggestion. It wouldn't acheive the desired effect at all. You could still have a 14 year old girl being made pregnant by a 19 year old man.ruisleipa wrote:
sterilise boys instead ffs.Bertster7 wrote:
sterilising teenage girls
Whereas if all girls between 13 and 16 cannot get pregnant, that solves teen pregnancy - at least in that age range.
If you watch the kids they appear well behaved.. maybe it's because they've had so much responsibility thrust upon them.Turquoise wrote:
Not necessarily. If they have someone other than their mother to use as a role model, they might actually amount to something.cpt.fass1 wrote:
But then what? we have 13 kids leeching off the system to repeat the same shit their mom did?
I say make them start working coal mines.
I'm sure the mom is making them take care of themselves while she goes out looking for another baby daddy. ..aka paycheck.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
alright sterilise all men and create a eugenics programme allowing only select males like me to inseminate the women...?
Another stupid and unworkable idea.ruisleipa wrote:
alright sterilise all men and create a eugenics programme allowing only select males like me to inseminate the women...?
Sterilising girls between 13 and 16 only prevents some undesired consequences of them breaking the law. It's a bit of an infringement of their rights, but not in any sort of practical terms.
Only downside I can see is a potential increase in the levels of STIs teenagers have....
Last edited by Bertster7 (2010-04-23 13:03:55)
Womens job is to make babies and raise them. Keep the house clean.
She is doing her natural job.
Welfare negates the need for a father and breeds people who just need to be shot, like her. She has no skills, no income potential, probably fat, ugly and fucked out.
Sirs, this is 20% of America and skin color has nothing to do with it.
She is doing her natural job.
Welfare negates the need for a father and breeds people who just need to be shot, like her. She has no skills, no income potential, probably fat, ugly and fucked out.
Sirs, this is 20% of America and skin color has nothing to do with it.
I know this is D&ST but is your sarcasm detector busted?Bertster7 wrote:
Another stupid and unworkable idea.ruisleipa wrote:
alright sterilise all men and create a eugenics programme allowing only select males like me to inseminate the women...?
lolsATG wrote:
Womens job is to make babies and raise them. Keep the house clean.
She is doing her natural job.
Who are they going to sterilise?
Is that really something that is in the works? If you tie the dudes baby maker it is reversible..
Is that really something that is in the works? If you tie the dudes baby maker it is reversible..
wut.. women aren't nesters?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I'd do her
You probably already have.Pug wrote:
I'd do her
Yes, now pay for my brood
hmmmm...ATG wrote:
Womens job is to make babies and raise them. Keep the house clean.
She is doing her natural job.
Welfare negates the need for a father and breeds people who just need to be shot, like her. She has no skills, no income potential, probably fat, ugly and fucked out.
Sirs, this is 20% of America and skin color has nothing to do with it.
have you ever been to africa? they pop out kids left and right.
so, you can say that aboot women, but i cant say that about african american women? fuck all.
This is ridiculous.
You can't take the children away from their mother because she can't make it on her own, that's soooo 1950's and its wrong.
You can't sterilize her... that's sooo 1930's and that's wrong too.
a lot of the taboos on having kids only in marriage are broken because we have DNA testing now
so why are we permitting the dad or Daddies to pull a goonie bird, why should they get to pollute the nest with their offspring and expect others to pay for it. She says ten of the kids were fathered by someone who is in prison... IMO the place to start is to confirm that fact and if some of the kids aren't his, then go find those dads and make them pay. If she won't give them the dads, then why should we help her... just help the kids.
Perhaps one solution is to run DNA matches through DNA banks.
/facepalm "Ten of the children, she said, were fathered by Garry Brown, currently serving a five-year prison term for dealing cocaine. A sampling of his kids' names: Garry Nesha, Garry Brown Jr., Garry Lethia, Garryiell and Garry Rick."
You can't take the children away from their mother because she can't make it on her own, that's soooo 1950's and its wrong.
You can't sterilize her... that's sooo 1930's and that's wrong too.
a lot of the taboos on having kids only in marriage are broken because we have DNA testing now
so why are we permitting the dad or Daddies to pull a goonie bird, why should they get to pollute the nest with their offspring and expect others to pay for it. She says ten of the kids were fathered by someone who is in prison... IMO the place to start is to confirm that fact and if some of the kids aren't his, then go find those dads and make them pay. If she won't give them the dads, then why should we help her... just help the kids.
Perhaps one solution is to run DNA matches through DNA banks.
/facepalm "Ten of the children, she said, were fathered by Garry Brown, currently serving a five-year prison term for dealing cocaine. A sampling of his kids' names: Garry Nesha, Garry Brown Jr., Garry Lethia, Garryiell and Garry Rick."
I'm not a big fan of the Chinese government but I do like their practice of limiting the amount of children a household can have. Make it something like 3 or 4 in the US.
Anyway the kids should be placed in foster care. The mother doesn't deserve state aid, or at least deserves to be put in the back of the waiting list, but those poor kids didn't have a say in whether they'd be born to some moron like her.
Anyway the kids should be placed in foster care. The mother doesn't deserve state aid, or at least deserves to be put in the back of the waiting list, but those poor kids didn't have a say in whether they'd be born to some moron like her.
Is this Sarcasm?Diesel_dyk wrote:
This is ridiculous.
You can't take the children away from their mother because she can't make it on her own, that's soooo 1950's and its wrong.
You can't sterilize her... that's sooo 1930's and that's wrong too.
a lot of the taboos on having kids only in marriage are broken because we have DNA testing now
so why are we permitting the dad or Daddies to pull a goonie bird, why should they get to pollute the nest with their offspring and expect others to pay for it. She says ten of the kids were fathered by someone who is in prison... IMO the place to start is to confirm that fact and if some of the kids aren't his, then go find those dads and make them pay. If she won't give them the dads, then why should we help her... just help the kids.
Perhaps one solution is to run DNA matches through DNA banks.
/facepalm "Ten of the children, she said, were fathered by Garry Brown, currently serving a five-year prison term for dealing cocaine. A sampling of his kids' names: Garry Nesha, Garry Brown Jr., Garry Lethia, Garryiell and Garry Rick."
pesticide would have helped, why did nobody see this coming?
Pretty much... its a ridiculous situation. Cynicism on everything. But not the goonie bird DNA testing stuff. That I was serious about.. make the fathers pay before the taxpayers pay.... same with octomomcpt.fass1 wrote:
Is this Sarcasm?Diesel_dyk wrote:
This is ridiculous.
You can't take the children away from their mother because she can't make it on her own, that's soooo 1950's and its wrong.
You can't sterilize her... that's sooo 1930's and that's wrong too.
a lot of the taboos on having kids only in marriage are broken because we have DNA testing now
so why are we permitting the dad or Daddies to pull a goonie bird, why should they get to pollute the nest with their offspring and expect others to pay for it. She says ten of the kids were fathered by someone who is in prison... IMO the place to start is to confirm that fact and if some of the kids aren't his, then go find those dads and make them pay. If she won't give them the dads, then why should we help her... just help the kids.
Perhaps one solution is to run DNA matches through DNA banks.
/facepalm "Ten of the children, she said, were fathered by Garry Brown, currently serving a five-year prison term for dealing cocaine. A sampling of his kids' names: Garry Nesha, Garry Brown Jr., Garry Lethia, Garryiell and Garry Rick."
Gotcha, but with a woman like that. If she wasn't getting the benefits before, she wouldn't have so many kids. Bottom line is that Welfare system needs to be reworked. We just throw money at the poor to keep them silent, then if they actually try to excel or improve their situation they get screw'd.