prototype
Member
+52|6303
buy the game as long as you meet the min requirements

its worth it and you get decent fps
mooneyno1
Carl Gustav <3333
+16|5954|Sheffield

prototype wrote:

buy the game as long as you meet the min requirements

its worth it and you get decent fps
I heard that from the beta to the final game they made it run better, is this true?

Also:
https://i39.tinypic.com/35a6691.png

whoop
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6373|the land of bourbon

mooneyno1 wrote:

prototype wrote:

buy the game as long as you meet the min requirements

its worth it and you get decent fps
I heard that from the beta to the final game they made it run better, is this true?

Also:
http://i39.tinypic.com/35a6691.png

whoop
idk about that setup.  i was playing with an 8800 gtx and it made my eyes bleed it was so laggy.  if i turned my head from right to left, i missed so many frames, enemies could run past me and i wouldn't see them.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
mooneyno1
Carl Gustav <3333
+16|5954|Sheffield

steelie34 wrote:

mooneyno1 wrote:

prototype wrote:

buy the game as long as you meet the min requirements

its worth it and you get decent fps
I heard that from the beta to the final game they made it run better, is this true?

Also:
http://i39.tinypic.com/35a6691.png

whoop
idk about that setup.  i was playing with an 8800 gtx and it made my eyes bleed it was so laggy.  if i turned my head from right to left, i missed so many frames, enemies could run past me and i wouldn't see them.
Will just have to force my pc to play it, and if it doesn't like it. sasha (joke) is going through the window.

Last edited by mooneyno1 (2010-04-23 05:47:19)

Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|5780|Catherine Black
Pff, XP.
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6666|Canberra, AUS

Trotskygrad wrote:

Finray wrote:

mooneyno1 wrote:


lmao, imagine actually playing a game with 5fps. jesus christ.
Metro 2033 1680x1050 DX 11 8xAA 16xAF.

When I had my E5200.

Single figures/low teens.

So goddamn gorgeous though.
WiC right after the tactical nuke comes in...

I run it fine on my MacBook Pro (old one) with 512 MB graphics mem on 9800, Dual core 2.4 GHz, and 2 GB RAM...

Low settings though...
put that game on very high. holy shit. i couldn't actually play any more because i would just look at the maps and the explosions.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
RoaringJet[FIN]
Member
+16|5447

mooneyno1 wrote:

prototype wrote:

buy the game as long as you meet the min requirements

its worth it and you get decent fps
I heard that from the beta to the final game they made it run better, is this true?

Also:
http://i39.tin6691.png

whoop
Dont trust systemrequirementslab, its based on requirements set by the game designers who just give false hope so more people would buy their product, instead using data from real tests

Last edited by RoaringJet[FIN] (2010-04-23 07:05:15)

Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5170|Sydney

RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:

mooneyno1 wrote:

prototype wrote:

buy the game as long as you meet the min requirements

its worth it and you get decent fps
I heard that from the beta to the final game they made it run better, is this true?

Also:
http://i39.tin6691.png

whoop
Dont trust systemrequirementslab, its based on requirements set by the game designers who just give false hope so more people would buy their product, instead using data from real tests
How can you say that? I tested it against my old PC, my new one through half the upgrade and then at completion. The settings were all accurate (barely play it, kinda play it, play it very well).
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|5780|Catherine Black
Ignore everything RoaringJet says, he's completely retarted.

retarted, that's the point.
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5349|London, England

RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:

mooneyno1 wrote:

prototype wrote:

buy the game as long as you meet the min requirements

its worth it and you get decent fps
I heard that from the beta to the final game they made it run better, is this true?

Also:
http://i39.tin6691.png

whoop
Dont trust systemrequirementslab, its based on requirements set by the game designers who just give false hope so more people would buy their product, instead using data from real tests
You're like the lowing of the gaming section. Fuck off already will ya?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|5991|Vortex Ring State

JohnG@lt wrote:

RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:

mooneyno1 wrote:


I heard that from the beta to the final game they made it run better, is this true?

Also:
http://i39.tin6691.png

whoop
Dont trust systemrequirementslab, its based on requirements set by the game designers who just give false hope so more people would buy their product, instead using data from real tests
You're like the lowing of the gaming section. Fuck off already will ya?
lol win.

Yeah, and the game actually looks decent on low, so don't be afraid of shit graphics.
jsnipy
...
+3,276|6514|...

sounds like you needa console
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5170|Sydney
Or upgrade your pc...

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/52172/Untitled.jpg


To be honest, at your computers specs even with every on ultra low it's going to be choppy as. I know this because my old comp had a better system requirement score, and pulled on average 15 fps.
mooneyno1
Carl Gustav <3333
+16|5954|Sheffield

Jaekus wrote:

Or upgrade your pc...

http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/52172/Untitled.jpg


To be honest, at your computers specs even with every on ultra low it's going to be choppy as. I know this because my old comp had a better system requirement score, and pulled on average 15 fps.
your pic makes me want to kill myself
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5170|Sydney

mooneyno1 wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Or upgrade your pc...

http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/52172/Untitled.jpg


To be honest, at your computers specs even with every on ultra low it's going to be choppy as. I know this because my old comp had a better system requirement score, and pulled on average 15 fps.
your pic makes me want to kill myself
I feel your pain bro.
2 months ago I had an AMD Athlon 64 x2 5200+, 2GBb DDR2, ASUS M2N-MX SE, Nvidia 8500GT, 120GB total HDD space.
All up my upgrade cost my pretty much bang on $1k.
Now I've got a new computer I kinda want to show it off a little...
mooneyno1
Carl Gustav <3333
+16|5954|Sheffield

Jaekus wrote:

mooneyno1 wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Or upgrade your pc...

http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/52172/Untitled.jpg


To be honest, at your computers specs even with every on ultra low it's going to be choppy as. I know this because my old comp had a better system requirement score, and pulled on average 15 fps.
your pic makes me want to kill myself
I feel your pain bro.
2 months ago I had an AMD Athlon 64 x2 5200+, 2GBb DDR2, ASUS M2N-MX SE, Nvidia 8500GT, 120GB total HDD space.
All up my upgrade cost my pretty much bang on $1k.
Now I've got a new computer I kinda want to show it off a little...
Got any spare cash that you could give me for pc update ?
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5170|Sydney
If there were such a thing as "spare cash" sure thing
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|5780|Catherine Black
Mine only passes minimum because systemrequirementslab only detects my onboard video, lulz.
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5170|Sydney

Finray wrote:

Mine only passes minimum because systemrequirementslab only detects my onboard video, lulz.
WTF?!

Have you got it disabled in your BIOS or device manager?

Last edited by Jaekus (2010-04-23 11:37:17)

Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|5780|Catherine Black
I use it for my third screen, so no.
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
jsnipy
...
+3,276|6514|...

Jaekus wrote:

Or upgrade your pc...

http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/52172/Untitled.jpg


To be honest, at your computers specs even with every on ultra low it's going to be choppy as. I know this because my old comp had a better system requirement score, and pulled on average 15 fps.
certainly my favorite option, but for those strapped for cash its makes better sense.

Last edited by jsnipy (2010-04-23 11:43:00)

Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5170|Sydney

Finray wrote:

I use it for my third screen, so no.
I reckon if you disabled it then ran it your result would improve, but if you know you can already play the game there seems little point in doing so.
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|5780|Catherine Black
Yeah, recommended ATi card is 4870, I have 5770 which is slightly better.
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
RoaringJet[FIN]
Member
+16|5447

Jaekus wrote:

RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:

mooneyno1 wrote:


I heard that from the beta to the final game they made it run better, is this true?

Also:
http://i39.tin6691.png

whoop
Dont trust systemrequirementslab, its based on requirements set by the game designers who just give false hope so more people would buy their product, instead using data from real tests
How can you say that? I tested it against my old PC, my new one through half the upgrade and then at completion. The settings were all accurate (barely play it, kinda play it, play it very well).
Every hardware configuraton is invidual, you cant just pick one and say "this will run perfectly on high settings" without first testing it on the actual game, Ive tried it few times and it claims you can run GTA4 smooth with 5yr old hardware.. When even the 1000e high end systems struggle with it on all max

I guess some people just believe everything they hear.
CammRobb
Banned
+1,510|6122|Carnoustie MASSIF

RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:

Dont trust systemrequirementslab, its based on requirements set by the game designers who just give false hope so more people would buy their product, instead using data from real tests
How can you say that? I tested it against my old PC, my new one through half the upgrade and then at completion. The settings were all accurate (barely play it, kinda play it, play it very well).
Every hardware configuraton is invidual, you cant just pick one and say "this will run perfectly on high settings" without first testing it on the actual game, Ive tried it few times and it claims you can run GTA4 smooth with 5yr old hardware.. When even the 1000e high end systems struggle with it on all max

I guess some people just believe everything they hear.
Go away you knob.

It analyses the hardware on your computer, then compares that to the games minimum/recommended requirments

Last edited by CammRobb (2010-04-23 16:22:16)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard