BF2S Forums "Being gay isn't a choice, but being a bigot certainly is."

You can be gay and that's fine and all but don't rub it into everyone's face and throw really weird parades.

RTHKI wrote:

Marlo Stanfield wrote:

You can be gay and that's fine and all but don't rub it into everyone's face and throw really weird parades.
http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/S … Parade.jpg

what tha fuck is this shit

What happens at every single gay pride parade to have ever taken place.

Actually I've been out on gay pride day most years in Amsterdam, and never recall seeing anything along those lines. Maybe a few buff shirtless dudes, but nothing weird and kinky like that.

Debatable. Most bigots would consider gay unnatural and therefore it would would be natural to be skeptical towards it...if that makes sense.

I've seen the NYC Gay Pride parade a long time ago, and that's pretty much spot on.

I was hung over it was in the 90's and I was leaving my friends apartment down on Hudson, so I decide to take Lincoln Tunnel cause it's usually the quickest. So while driving(was probably still drunk) I notice alot of same sex couples walking, holding hand and being all jolly. It was nice out so I thought nothing of it, as I cut up 34th street to get to the tunnel I notice that there number greatly increases and that there are barricades.

Sitting there bewildered next thing I hear is "IT"S RAINING MEN" blasting at high decibels and I look up to see a float with one obvious Drag Queen and about 15 dudes in banana hammocks swinging there hips like the sledge hammer guy at the quarry.. So needless to say that picture is pretty accurate by U.S. standards.

Also who really cares what other people do? I sure as hell don't.

Hoboken is the "Queen" city? As in Queens there?

Actually if I remember correctly it was on the Ave of the Americas?

Aren't all gays molesters? Thought I read that somehwere. We must protect the children.

jsnipy wrote:

Aren't all gays molesters? Thought I read that somehwere. We must protect the children.

krazed wrote:

Wreckognize wrote:

..teddy..jimmy wrote:

Debatable. Most bigots would consider gay unnatural and therefore it would would be natural to be skeptical towards it...if that makes sense.

Then that starts a debate on the definitions of natural and unnatural.

ive seen male deer mounting other male deer while ignoring the does in heat


it happens in nature, to me that screams natural

if it's on redtube it's natural

krazed wrote:

Wreckognize wrote:

..teddy..jimmy wrote:

Debatable. Most bigots would consider gay unnatural and therefore it would would be natural to be skeptical towards it...if that makes sense.

Then that starts a debate on the definitions of natural and unnatural.

ive seen male deer mounting other male deer while ignoring the does in heat


it happens in nature, to me that screams natural

Exactly.  Too bad things like facts and logic are lost on social conservatives.

Wreckognize wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/04/06/granderson.gay.lifestyle/index.html?hpt=C2


Really well written article.  I always laughed whenever I heard someone talking about the "gay agenda".  Like gays are some nefarious cabal that conspires to control society.

Its worth reading the history of AIDS.

There were campaigners who were so blinded by the 'gay rights' thing they refused to disclose they were gay when giving blood - before an AIDS test had been developed and the major known risk factor was being gay, and also the 'right' to operate bath houses where unsafe sex was condoned.