GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|6654|Finland

Oh temptations of Monday night--- 

http://www.aquatuning.fi/shopping_cart. … 6092d62085

Damn highend stuff is expensive. Must resist temptation...

Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2010-03-29 14:13:27)

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
-Whiteroom-
Pineapplewhat
+572|6898|BC, Canada

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

Oh temptations of Monday night--- 

http://www.aquatuning.fi/shopping_cart. … 6092d62085

Damn highend stuff is expensive. Must resist temptation...
I find hose clamps work far better than those plastic clamps, also do they carry tygon 3603 instead of 3400, that stuff is better.
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|6654|Finland

Nic wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

Oh temptations of Monday night--- 

http://www.aquatuning.fi/shopping_cart. … 6092d62085

Damn highend stuff is expensive. Must resist temptation...
I find hose clamps work far better than those plastic clamps, also do they carry tygon 3603 instead of 3400, that stuff is better.
You are talking about Finland, you'd be surprised how long I looked for that Tygon, yet alone their better stuff.

Really need to do some calculations first... I much rather get highend gfx setup with good aircooling than not so good gfx setup with water.

Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2010-03-29 14:19:34)

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6028|Catherine Black
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/33829/HDD.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6388|'straya
Hey guys just wondering... is there a way to make it so my sound does not automatically default to go though my HD4870 >HDMI cable >TV but rather X-Fi sound card > Headphones... I've tried changing the headphones to the default sound device but it wont work. What makes it weird is that iTunes/games etc try to play though TV speakers... but foobar2000 plays through my headphones. help?
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6807|NYC / Hamburg

https://i42.tinypic.com/1zf768p.png
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6388|'straya
Yeah... foobar 2000 does what I want it to do, but every other program/windows plays through HDMI and I cant change it
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6028|Catherine Black
https://i40.tinypic.com/w1cu87.png

When you have multiple audio devices installed, you'll get an option to "Set as Default". Try that.
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|7083|Reykjavík, Iceland.
I'm thinking about buying 2 Spinpoint F3 drives and run them in RAID0, should I add my current 320GB WD Caviars to that RAID? 320x4 array is plenty for me, I'm even thinking about just getting 500GB F3s.
Winston_Churchill
Bazinga!
+521|6978|Toronto | Canada

Finray wrote:

https://i40.tinypic.com/w1cu87.png
Stealing your picture for my uses...

So I've been using my laptop and WDTV alternately for the past 6 months to play movies on my TV via HDMI.  Its worked perfectly with both ever since I set it up, but all of the sudden my laptop will no longer recognize the audio on the HDMI.  Whenever I plug in the HDMI to my laptop the picture will change to the TV screen, but the audio screen (exactly the same as Finray's pic) shows HDMI as unplugged.  I havent installed any new audio programs or anything recently, so I dont know why it wouldnt work all of the sudden.  Any ideas?
bugz
Fission Mailed
+3,311|6552

Sydney wrote:

I'm thinking about buying 2 Spinpoint F3 drives and run them in RAID0, should I add my current 320GB WD Caviars to that RAID? 320x4 array is plenty for me, I'm even thinking about just getting 500GB F3s.
RAID 0+1 Fer backup sake?
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6526|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Sydney wrote:

I'm thinking about buying 2 Spinpoint F3 drives and run them in RAID0, should I add my current 320GB WD Caviars to that RAID? 320x4 array is plenty for me, I'm even thinking about just getting 500GB F3s.
Raid0 = Stripe
Raid1 = Mirror

Stripe = If 1 drive dies you risk losing all
Mirror = If 1 drive dies you just replace it and nothing is lost

afaik Raid1 can boost read times....

ebug9 wrote:

Sydney wrote:

I'm thinking about buying 2 Spinpoint F3 drives and run them in RAID0, should I add my current 320GB WD Caviars to that RAID? 320x4 array is plenty for me, I'm even thinking about just getting 500GB F3s.
RAID 0+1 Fer backup sake?
Meh 0+1 & 1+0 are more complicated when you need to check which is broken imo

Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-03-30 12:31:56)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
bugz
Fission Mailed
+3,311|6552

FloppY_ wrote:

Sydney wrote:

I'm thinking about buying 2 Spinpoint F3 drives and run them in RAID0, should I add my current 320GB WD Caviars to that RAID? 320x4 array is plenty for me, I'm even thinking about just getting 500GB F3s.
Raid0 = Stripe
Raid1 = Mirror

Stripe = If 1 drive dies you risk losing all
Mirror = If 1 drive dies you just replace it and nothing is lost

afaik Raid1 can boost read times....
RAID1 does indeed boost read times because it can look in one of two places for the same piece of data. With RAID 0+1 you can have the best of RAID 0 (fast write speeds) and RAID 1 (a mirror of your data plus faster read times).

Never actually tried it but most motherboards support it nowadays and come with a utility for software RAID.

Last edited by ebug9 (2010-03-30 12:31:05)

FloppY_
­
+1,010|6526|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

ebug9 wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

Sydney wrote:

I'm thinking about buying 2 Spinpoint F3 drives and run them in RAID0, should I add my current 320GB WD Caviars to that RAID? 320x4 array is plenty for me, I'm even thinking about just getting 500GB F3s.
Raid0 = Stripe
Raid1 = Mirror

Stripe = If 1 drive dies you risk losing all
Mirror = If 1 drive dies you just replace it and nothing is lost

afaik Raid1 can boost read times....
RAID1 does indeed boost read times because it can look in one of two places for the same piece of data. With RAID 0+1 you can have the best of RAID 0 (fast write speeds) and RAID 1 (a mirror of your data plus faster read times).

Never actually tried it but most motherboards support it nowadays and come with a utility for software RAID.
^- I added something above
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6388|'straya

Finray wrote:

http://i40.tinypic.com/w1cu87.png

When you have multiple audio devices installed, you'll get an option to "Set as Default". Try that.
Was the first thing I tried. But it won't let me change it from the HDMI to the headphones... it just defaults back to the HDMI straight away
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6821|SE London

FloppY_ wrote:

Sydney wrote:

I'm thinking about buying 2 Spinpoint F3 drives and run them in RAID0, should I add my current 320GB WD Caviars to that RAID? 320x4 array is plenty for me, I'm even thinking about just getting 500GB F3s.
Raid0 = Stripe
Raid1 = Mirror

Stripe = If 1 drive dies you risk losing all
Mirror = If 1 drive dies you just replace it and nothing is lost

afaik Raid1 can boost read times....
If by boost you mean increase (as in make slower), then yes, yes it can and does.
Winston_Churchill
Bazinga!
+521|6978|Toronto | Canada

FloppY_ wrote:

0+1 & 1+0
Theres a difference?  I've never done RAID before... whats the difference between the two?
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6526|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Bertster7 wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

Sydney wrote:

I'm thinking about buying 2 Spinpoint F3 drives and run them in RAID0, should I add my current 320GB WD Caviars to that RAID? 320x4 array is plenty for me, I'm even thinking about just getting 500GB F3s.
Raid0 = Stripe
Raid1 = Mirror

Stripe = If 1 drive dies you risk losing all
Mirror = If 1 drive dies you just replace it and nothing is lost

afaik Raid1 can boost read times....
If by boost you mean increase (as in make slower), then yes, yes it can and does.
No aaaaaand... NO
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6526|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Winston_Churchill wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

0+1 & 1+0
Theres a difference?  I've never done RAID before... whats the difference between the two?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID#Organization

I'm too tired to make sence enough right now

I'd recommend Raid1 though... choose a disk size that fits your needs and get two of them

Samsung F3 HDDs are dirt cheap these days...

Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-03-30 12:50:22)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6028|Catherine Black

Winston_Churchill wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

0+1 & 1+0
Theres a difference?  I've never done RAID before... whats the difference between the two?
Raid 0 is when you have two hard-drives. Windows sees them as one. For example, if we use two 500GB drives, Windows will see these as 1TB. When writing files to these hard-drives, it will write half the file to one drive, and half to the other drive, in theory doubling read/write speeds.

Raid 0+1 is when you have three drives, and have two set up as is in Raid 0. The third drive then copies one of the Raid 0 drives. If a disk is to fail, you only need half the information (when reading through the backup drive, it can take any '1' and realise on the other drive the corresponding binary digit would have to have been a '0'.)
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
bugz
Fission Mailed
+3,311|6552

Finray wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

0+1 & 1+0
Theres a difference?  I've never done RAID before... whats the difference between the two?
Raid 0 is when you have two hard-drives. Windows sees them as one. For example, if we use two 500GB drives, Windows will see these as 1TB. When writing files to these hard-drives, it will write half the file to one drive, and half to the other drive, in theory doubling read/write speeds.

Raid 0+1 is when you have three drives, and have two set up as is in Raid 0. The third drive then copies one of the Raid 0 drives. If a disk is to fail, you only need half the information (when reading through the backup drive, it can take any '1' and realise on the other drive the corresponding binary digit would have to have been a '0'.)
Needs 4 drives. 2 for striping, and 2 to mirror that striped volume.

Last edited by ebug9 (2010-03-30 13:06:05)

Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6028|Catherine Black
I was sure I read/heard somewhere that you could do it with three?
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
bugz
Fission Mailed
+3,311|6552

Finray wrote:

I was sure I read/heard somewhere that you could do it with three?
A stripe is across two drives. If you're going to then mirror that, you need another two drives to do so.
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|7083|Reykjavík, Iceland.
I don't give a flying fuck about the data on my OS/Games drive, I'm gonna RAID0 with all 4 drives, I've got my data stored elsewhere.

I'm just wondering whether it would be worthwile to turn my current 2 disk RAID0 into a 4 disk RAID0.

Last edited by Sydney (2010-03-30 13:35:20)

bugz
Fission Mailed
+3,311|6552

Sydney wrote:

I don't give a flying fuck about the data on my OS/Games drive, I'm gonna RAID0 with all 4 drives, I've got my data stored elsewhere.

I'm just wondering whether it would be worthwile to turn my current 2 disk RAID0 into a 4 disk RAID0.
Unless you're running out of room for programs/games, you might as well just throw them in and use them as data drives.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard