Peter
Super Awesome Member
+494|6594|dm_maidenhead

M.O.A.B wrote:

androoz wrote:

we just need to legalize marijuana as a start.

it can be safer than alcohol yet is illegal still? wtf.
People in proximity can't inhale your alcohol.
I often spark up in a big group of people I know don't like it.


-.-
androoz
Banned
+137|5405|United States

Peter wrote:

androoz wrote:

we just need to legalize marijuana as a start.

it can be safer than alcohol yet is illegal still? wtf.
androoz. I truly hope you have done enough research to be able to say that and you're not just saying that because you've read a few posts and you've just tried smoking and you're at the stage when hurrrrr weed is cool.

I agree with the point, but people are probably going to start arguing with you and you need to be able to make good arguments.
ive been reading a bit here and there on weed for a while now.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6415|Escea

1927 wrote:

Thank god Im going home I aint getting into another weed/good/bad thread.

Its illegal for a reason, the experts cant be wrong. Can they?
I sense there's a conspiracy afoot!
androoz
Banned
+137|5405|United States
"yes but people in proximity have to put up with some of the stupid shit people intoxicated on alcohol do, and may be affected by their actions."

x2
Adams_BJ
Russian warship, go fuck yourself
+2,054|6815|Little Bentcock
flash games are the shit
gooood morning   
it is so warm out already  feels like 50 degrees.. mebbe spring is really coming this year lol
even the mating ducks have returned  hubba
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6663
the health experts are right, it is relatively safe compared to alcohol and the like

the legal/societal experts are also right, it is unsafe to have such a substance and the implications of its abuse left to run riot in society

drugs and their health-risks are one thing. drugs and their effect on society and people as a whole are another. it's just not conducive to a good society to have a generation of abusers, escapists and wasters.

Last edited by Uzique (2010-03-30 09:01:51)

libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
moderation is key
Peter
Super Awesome Member
+494|6594|dm_maidenhead

1927 wrote:

Thank god Im going home I aint getting into another weed/good/bad thread.

Its illegal for a reason, the experts cant be wrong. Can they?
In december the government sacked the chairman for the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. (people who advise govt. on dangers of drugs) because he disagreed with the government on the dangers of drugs.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8509911.stm
Prof Nutt had criticised a government decision to reclassify cannabis, saying it was less harmful than alcohol and nicotine and claiming it had been upgraded to Class B for political reasons.

As a result of his sacking, several other advisers resigned and over 20 scientists called for ministers to sign up to a code of conduct to prevent political interference in the system of scientific advice.
But yeah I think politicians know more than chief scientists too
androoz
Banned
+137|5405|United States

Uzique wrote:

the health experts are right, it is relatively safe compared to alcohol and the like

the legal/societal experts are also right, it is unsafe to have such a substance and the implications of its abuse left to run riot in society

drugs and their health-risks are one thing. drugs and their effect on society and people as a whole are another. it's just not conducive to a good society to have a generation of abusers, escapists and wasters.
"the legal/societal experts are also right, it is unsafe to have such a substance and the implications of its abuse left to run riot in society"

then why is alcohol legal?

edit- im assuming youre talking about meph, i dont really know much about it but im sure its quite different from marijuana in terms of health effects.

Last edited by androoz (2010-03-30 09:03:26)

Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6663
read my last post, peter

you cant have some ultra-libertarian, individualist society where everyone does things according to personal health and responsibility

there has to be some underlying utilitarian cohesion

if you dont understand that simple principle then you're really not fit for any debate on the subject

alcohol is legal still for economic reasons, really. it's a huge generator of tax revenue. its an historical anomaly.

Last edited by Uzique (2010-03-30 09:04:17)

libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Peter
Super Awesome Member
+494|6594|dm_maidenhead
yeah i agree with you completely.

I'm just saying if people weren't stupid then it would work. But people are, so it wouldn't.
androoz
Banned
+137|5405|United States

Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:

moderation is key
x2, people act like that if marijuana is legal everyone is gonna be a stoner and be lazy.

in fact i dont think that many more people will even start smoking if its legal in america.

cant see it being any different than alcohol, ie having a few sessions here and there.
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5430|Cleveland, Ohio

androoz wrote:

loubot wrote:

androoz wrote:


wait what? lol please explain yourself because ive never said i was 12.
Classic Androoz: asking a question when there is no need to ask a question for an obvious statement.


i have a habit of using question marks.

i was just curious what he meant though because im not even 12.
guess you missed the "or whatever."  man you are stupid.
androoz
Banned
+137|5405|United States

11 Bravo wrote:

androoz wrote:

loubot wrote:


Classic Androoz: asking a question when there is no need to ask a question for an obvious statement.


i have a habit of using question marks.

i was just curious what he meant though because im not even 12.
guess you missed the "or whatever."  man you are stupid.
i cba reading back but im pretty sure you said i was a pedophile or some shit acting like im 12 or "whatever", no?

what the fuck, no point in even talking to you.

/ignore.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6415|Escea

Peter
Super Awesome Member
+494|6594|dm_maidenhead
And when I went to amsterdam in february you'll never guess what guys. Everything was fine. People weren't lying on the side of the road mashed out of their face.
The biggest problem was probably stupid drunk (english) tourists.
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5430|Cleveland, Ohio

androoz wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

androoz wrote:




i have a habit of using question marks.

i was just curious what he meant though because im not even 12.
guess you missed the "or whatever."  man you are stupid.
i cba reading back but im pretty sure you said i was a pedophile or some shit acting like im 12 or "whatever", no?

what the fuck, no point in even talking to you.

/ignore.
cba to find the thread in the bf2 section where you told people you were 10 or something.  then your DST intro thread says you are 14.

see, if you tell the truth its much easier.  that or keep better track of your lies.
SEREVENT
MASSIVE G STAR
+605|6300|Birmingham, UK
he said "lol 11 year old androoz posting" in a topic 3 years old so hes 14
Peter
Super Awesome Member
+494|6594|dm_maidenhead
That episode is way more pro-weed than anti-weed.

[Brian and Peter are pulled over by policeman, the body of Quagmire's cat in the backseat. Peter is drunk and covered in blood stains. Two policeman exit the car and situate themselves on either side of Peter's car]
Policeman #1: What do we got, partner?
Policeman #2: [Bends over and inspects the inside of the car] Empty alcohol containers, the driver's inebriated and covered in blood, he's got scratches on his face and arms, there's a blood-soaked corpse in the backseat, got shovels in there, and a hand-drawn map titled This is where we'll hide the body.
Policeman #1: Well, that all seems fine. Sorry to bother you sir.
[A small bag of weed falls from Brian's collar onto his lap. Policeman #2 notices]
Policeman #2: Pot! [Withdrawing gun and aiming it at Brian] Small amount of pot!
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6663
hamsterdam
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
androoz
Banned
+137|5405|United States

11 Bravo wrote:

androoz wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:


guess you missed the "or whatever."  man you are stupid.
i cba reading back but im pretty sure you said i was a pedophile or some shit acting like im 12 or "whatever", no?

what the fuck, no point in even talking to you.

/ignore.
cba to find the thread in the bf2 section where you told people you were 10 or something.  then your DST intro thread says you are 14.

see, if you tell the truth its much easier.  that or keep better track of your lies.
uhhh, jesus h christ. i said i was 10 when i started playing bf2. honestly, give up.

@peter, ya amsterdam is a good example. i think after some years it could become the 'norm' like alcohol here/other countries.
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5430|Cleveland, Ohio

SEREVENT wrote:

he said "lol 11 year old androoz posting" in a topic 3 years old so hes 14
right...then i asked why he wasnt at school and he said he was older.  like now.  should be at school.  serevent dont be a twat.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6415|Escea

Peter wrote:

That episode is way more pro-weed than anti-weed.

[Brian and Peter are pulled over by policeman, the body of Quagmire's cat in the backseat. Peter is drunk and covered in blood stains. Two policeman exit the car and situate themselves on either side of Peter's car]
Policeman #1: What do we got, partner?
Policeman #2: [Bends over and inspects the inside of the car] Empty alcohol containers, the driver's inebriated and covered in blood, he's got scratches on his face and arms, there's a blood-soaked corpse in the backseat, got shovels in there, and a hand-drawn map titled This is where we'll hide the body.
Policeman #1: Well, that all seems fine. Sorry to bother you sir.
[A small bag of weed falls from Brian's collar onto his lap. Policeman #2 notices]
Policeman #2: Pot! [Withdrawing gun and aiming it at Brian] Small amount of pot!
I am aware of that. There's no need to put up some defence for smoking weed Pete, because by and large, unless someone's puffing a cloud into my face, I couldn't give a rat's arse.
androoz
Banned
+137|5405|United States

11 Bravo wrote:

SEREVENT wrote:

he said "lol 11 year old androoz posting" in a topic 3 years old so hes 14
right...then i asked why he wasnt at school and he said he was older.  like now.  should be at school.  serevent dont be a twat.
um i am at school?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard