Boy, that must be one hellova search, I shall continue to wait for proof she is a racist.
Last edited by lowing (2010-03-24 18:06:41)
Last edited by lowing (2010-03-24 18:06:41)
What is so disgusting about her?DesertFox- wrote:
Ugh the more I learn about her, the more disgusted I become. Seems you're a liberal if you don't agree with her, though.
The general stupidity and lack of logic behind what comes out of her trap is what is disgusting.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
What is so disgusting about her?DesertFox- wrote:
Ugh the more I learn about her, the more disgusted I become. Seems you're a liberal if you don't agree with her, though.
I still don't understand what the hell is wrong with some of you that makes another you go batshit when someone else thinks differently than you.
That's just a selection of them down until the letter E. Read for yourselfHer on Wikiquote, sources there wrote:
Six imams removed from a US Airways flight from Minneapolis to Phoenix are calling on Muslims to boycott the airline. If only we could get Muslims to boycott all airlines, we could dispense with airport security altogether.
[Canadians] better hope the United States does not roll over one night and crush them. They are lucky we allow them to exist on the same continent.
Being nice to people is, in fact, one of the incidental tenets of Christianity (as opposed to other religions whose tenets are more along the lines of 'kill everyone who doesn't smell bad and doesn't answer to the name Mohammed').
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.
The ethic of conservation is the explicit abnegation of man's dominion over the Earth. The lower species are here for our use. God said so: Go forth, be fruitful, multiply, and rape the planet — it's yours. That's our job: drilling, mining and stripping. Sweaters are the anti-Biblical view. Big gas-guzzling cars with phones and CD players and wet bars — that's the Biblical view.
I would like evolution to join the roster of other discredited religions, like the Cargo Cult of the South Pacific. Practitioners of Cargo Cult believed that manufactured products were created by ancestral spirits, and if they imitated what they had seen the white man do, they could cause airplanes to appear out of the sky, bringing valuable cargo like radios and TVs. So they constructed “airport towers” out of bamboo and “headphones” out of coconuts and waited for the airplanes to come with the cargo. It may sound silly, but in defense of the Cargo Cult, they did not wait as long for evidence supporting their theory as the Darwinists have waited for evidence supporting theirs.
Like I pointed out in this post, that everyone seemed to ignore, a lot of what she says is taken out of context. Most of the things on that wikiquote page is quote minded in order to make her look like a complete bitch when she isn't.DesertFox- wrote:
The general stupidity and lack of logic behind what comes out of her trap is what is disgusting.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
What is so disgusting about her?DesertFox- wrote:
Ugh the more I learn about her, the more disgusted I become. Seems you're a liberal if you don't agree with her, though.
I still don't understand what the hell is wrong with some of you that makes another you go batshit when someone else thinks differently than you.That's just a selection of them down until the letter E. Read for yourselfHer on Wikiquote, sources there wrote:
Six imams removed from a US Airways flight from Minneapolis to Phoenix are calling on Muslims to boycott the airline. If only we could get Muslims to boycott all airlines, we could dispense with airport security altogether.
[Canadians] better hope the United States does not roll over one night and crush them. They are lucky we allow them to exist on the same continent.
Being nice to people is, in fact, one of the incidental tenets of Christianity (as opposed to other religions whose tenets are more along the lines of 'kill everyone who doesn't smell bad and doesn't answer to the name Mohammed').
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.
The ethic of conservation is the explicit abnegation of man's dominion over the Earth. The lower species are here for our use. God said so: Go forth, be fruitful, multiply, and rape the planet — it's yours. That's our job: drilling, mining and stripping. Sweaters are the anti-Biblical view. Big gas-guzzling cars with phones and CD players and wet bars — that's the Biblical view.
I would like evolution to join the roster of other discredited religions, like the Cargo Cult of the South Pacific. Practitioners of Cargo Cult believed that manufactured products were created by ancestral spirits, and if they imitated what they had seen the white man do, they could cause airplanes to appear out of the sky, bringing valuable cargo like radios and TVs. So they constructed “airport towers” out of bamboo and “headphones” out of coconuts and waited for the airplanes to come with the cargo. It may sound silly, but in defense of the Cargo Cult, they did not wait as long for evidence supporting their theory as the Darwinists have waited for evidence supporting theirs.
I don't see how any sort of context, save for pure sarcasm, makes any of those quotes anything short of contemptuous.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
Like I pointed out in this post, that everyone seemed to ignore, a lot of what she says is taken out of context. Most of the things on that wikiquote page is quote minded in order to make her look like a complete bitch when she isn't.DesertFox- wrote:
The general stupidity and lack of logic behind what comes out of her trap is what is disgusting.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
What is so disgusting about her?
I still don't understand what the hell is wrong with some of you that makes another you go batshit when someone else thinks differently than you.That's just a selection of them down until the letter E. Read for yourselfHer on Wikiquote, sources there wrote:
Six imams removed from a US Airways flight from Minneapolis to Phoenix are calling on Muslims to boycott the airline. If only we could get Muslims to boycott all airlines, we could dispense with airport security altogether.
[Canadians] better hope the United States does not roll over one night and crush them. They are lucky we allow them to exist on the same continent.
Being nice to people is, in fact, one of the incidental tenets of Christianity (as opposed to other religions whose tenets are more along the lines of 'kill everyone who doesn't smell bad and doesn't answer to the name Mohammed').
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.
The ethic of conservation is the explicit abnegation of man's dominion over the Earth. The lower species are here for our use. God said so: Go forth, be fruitful, multiply, and rape the planet — it's yours. That's our job: drilling, mining and stripping. Sweaters are the anti-Biblical view. Big gas-guzzling cars with phones and CD players and wet bars — that's the Biblical view.
I would like evolution to join the roster of other discredited religions, like the Cargo Cult of the South Pacific. Practitioners of Cargo Cult believed that manufactured products were created by ancestral spirits, and if they imitated what they had seen the white man do, they could cause airplanes to appear out of the sky, bringing valuable cargo like radios and TVs. So they constructed “airport towers” out of bamboo and “headphones” out of coconuts and waited for the airplanes to come with the cargo. It may sound silly, but in defense of the Cargo Cult, they did not wait as long for evidence supporting their theory as the Darwinists have waited for evidence supporting theirs.
Last edited by Spark (2010-03-24 19:46:28)
JUST KIDDING LOL seems to be her response when she gets called out: When answering questions from students, Coulter told a 17-year-old Muslim student to "take a camel" instead of the flying carpet she has previously suggested Muslims use for transportation. Coulter later told CTV that the "camel" remark was a joke.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
how the hell can something like "
[Canadians] better hope the United States does not roll over one night and crush them. They are lucky we allow them to exist on the same continent.
"
be taken out of context unless she said "JUST KIDDING LOL" right after?
Context or no context, these quotes are idiotic.DesertFox- wrote:
JUST KIDDING LOL seems to be her response when she gets called out: When answering questions from students, Coulter told a 17-year-old Muslim student to "take a camel" instead of the flying carpet she has previously suggested Muslims use for transportation. Coulter later told CTV that the "camel" remark was a joke.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
how the hell can something like "
[Canadians] better hope the United States does not roll over one night and crush them. They are lucky we allow them to exist on the same continent.
"
be taken out of context unless she said "JUST KIDDING LOL" right after?
DesertFox- wrote:
The general stupidity and lack of logic behind what comes out of her trap is what is disgusting.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
What is so disgusting about her?DesertFox- wrote:
Ugh the more I learn about her, the more disgusted I become. Seems you're a liberal if you don't agree with her, though.
I still don't understand what the hell is wrong with some of you that makes another you go batshit when someone else thinks differently than you.So? She's a hardcore Christian. They're entitled to their beliefsHer on Wikiquote, sources there wrote:
Six imams removed from a US Airways flight from Minneapolis to Phoenix are calling on Muslims to boycott the airline. If only we could get Muslims to boycott all airlines, we could dispense with airport security altogether.
Is she wrong? Who besides Muslims have committed acts of terrorism using airlines? Hint: none
[Canadians] better hope the United States does not roll over one night and crush them. They are lucky we allow them to exist on the same continent.
yes, stupid
Being nice to people is, in fact, one of the incidental tenets of Christianity (as opposed to other religions whose tenets are more along the lines of 'kill everyone who doesn't smell bad and doesn't answer to the name Mohammed').
Prove her wrong
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.
It is war, and she's right about everything but converting people
The ethic of conservation is the explicit abnegation of man's dominion over the Earth. The lower species are here for our use. God said so: Go forth, be fruitful, multiply, and rape the planet — it's yours. That's our job: drilling, mining and stripping. Sweaters are the anti-Biblical view. Big gas-guzzling cars with phones and CD players and wet bars — that's the Biblical view.
Stupid comment meant to get a reaction. Does anyone remember the "Asshole" song by Denis Leary? The lyrics were quite similar to what she said here
I would like evolution to join the roster of other discredited religions, like the Cargo Cult of the South Pacific. Practitioners of Cargo Cult believed that manufactured products were created by ancestral spirits, and if they imitated what they had seen the white man do, they could cause airplanes to appear out of the sky, bringing valuable cargo like radios and TVs. So they constructed “airport towers” out of bamboo and “headphones” out of coconuts and waited for the airplanes to come with the cargo. It may sound silly, but in defense of the Cargo Cult, they did not wait as long for evidence supporting their theory as the Darwinists have waited for evidence supporting theirs.
That's just a selection of them down until the letter E. Read for yourself
JohnG@lt wrote:
DesertFox- wrote:
The general stupidity and lack of logic behind what comes out of her trap is what is disgusting.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
What is so disgusting about her?
I still don't understand what the hell is wrong with some of you that makes another you go batshit when someone else thinks differently than you.So? She's a hardcore Christian. They're entitled to their beliefsHer on Wikiquote, sources there wrote:
Six imams removed from a US Airways flight from Minneapolis to Phoenix are calling on Muslims to boycott the airline. If only we could get Muslims to boycott all airlines, we could dispense with airport security altogether.
Is she wrong? Who besides Muslims have committed acts of terrorism using airlines? Hint: none
Irrelevant. She is saying that all Muslims are a threat to air travel and the safety of others, actually she's saying that ALL and ONLY Muslims are.
[Canadians] better hope the United States does not roll over one night and crush them. They are lucky we allow them to exist on the same continent.
yes, stupid
Being nice to people is, in fact, one of the incidental tenets of Christianity (as opposed to other religions whose tenets are more along the lines of 'kill everyone who doesn't smell bad and doesn't answer to the name Mohammed').
Prove her wrong
Non-radical Islam has nearly identical tenets to those of normal Christianity, hence why we have Muslims who aren't terrorists
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.
It is war, and she's right about everything but converting people
We carpet bombed Germany because it was total war and that was the best we could do to win. It wasn't designed solely to kill the enemy but to disrupt the war effort. We tried as best we could to hit the factories, too. What should we do now, bomb random factories in the Middle East?
The ethic of conservation is the explicit abnegation of man's dominion over the Earth. The lower species are here for our use. God said so: Go forth, be fruitful, multiply, and rape the planet — it's yours. That's our job: drilling, mining and stripping. Sweaters are the anti-Biblical view. Big gas-guzzling cars with phones and CD players and wet bars — that's the Biblical view.
Stupid comment meant to get a reaction. Does anyone remember the "Asshole" song by Denis Leary? The lyrics were quite similar to what she said here
I would like evolution to join the roster of other discredited religions, like the Cargo Cult of the South Pacific. Practitioners of Cargo Cult believed that manufactured products were created by ancestral spirits, and if they imitated what they had seen the white man do, they could cause airplanes to appear out of the sky, bringing valuable cargo like radios and TVs. So they constructed “airport towers” out of bamboo and “headphones” out of coconuts and waited for the airplanes to come with the cargo. It may sound silly, but in defense of the Cargo Cult, they did not wait as long for evidence supporting their theory as the Darwinists have waited for evidence supporting theirs.
It's a sign of ignorance that is just a slap in the face to science. I have to /facepalm everytime these "Christians" do this because they make the rest of us look bad as well. The very fact that we can associate Chrstianity with this belief is awful in and of itself
That's just a selection of them down until the letter E. Read for yourself
Hey Lowing... in the first article I think you find all the proof you need where she sayslowing wrote:
Ya know what I love and find oh so consistent with liberals, they have no problem screaming how wrong she is, and call what you say vial diarrhea, yet none of them actually challenges her as to why she is wrong, or even prove it. Much like here, thewy dismiss it or re-direct it
Last edited by Diesel_dyk (2010-03-24 23:22:23)
I might let the spelling go, but vial is a completely different word than vile.Diesel_dyk wrote:
vial
Hah.lowing wrote:
vial
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2010-03-24 23:21:11)
Did I miss something? Was war actually declared?JohnG@lt wrote:
It is war, and she's right about everything but converting peopleWe should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.
"Sometimes you just gotta laugh."lowing wrote:
lol ahhhhh yessss Yes the classic liberal approach, laugh off and dismiss. Because proving her wrong or addressing her points toe to toe just won't doCameronPoe wrote:
This is actually rather annoying. This is playing directly into her shit-stained hate-filled hands. It just draws attention to her and lines her pocket even further. The best medicine is to dismiss/laugh off idiots like her.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2010-03-24 23:33:45)
Her face for one...Marlo Stanfield wrote:
What is so disgusting about her?DesertFox- wrote:
Ugh the more I learn about her, the more disgusted I become. Seems you're a liberal if you don't agree with her, though.
I still don't understand what the hell is wrong with some of you that makes another you go batshit when someone else thinks differently than you.
Last edited by 11 Bravo (2010-03-25 06:03:56)
That is because Keith O. doesn't say anything worth listening to. Niether the entire liberal talk circuit for that matter. Ratings and failings prove it. People are smarter than that. SO the only tactic they have is to attack the person and not her words.11 Bravo wrote:
why are we talking about ann coulter? you guys are so sad to create a thread about her. its just like people who cry about bill o. pathetic.
i know. they are just mad people dont care about what their people say. thats why NPR failed. nobody wanted to listen. right or wrong they get people talking, and thats the point of TV. people are so stupid its amazing.lowing wrote:
That is because Keith O. doesn't say anything worth listening to. Niether the entire liberal talk circuit for that matter. Ratings and failings prove it. People are smarter than that. SO the only tactic they have is to attack the person and not her words.11 Bravo wrote:
why are we talking about ann coulter? you guys are so sad to create a thread about her. its just like people who cry about bill o. pathetic.
Yup conservative talk brings awareness to an issue and you are exactly correct sparks an interest, and a discussion. Liberals want none of that. They just want you to shut up and pay.11 Bravo wrote:
i know. they are just mad people dont care about what their people say. thats why NPR failed. nobody wanted to listen. right or wrong they get people talking, and thats the point of TV. people are so stupid its amazing.lowing wrote:
That is because Keith O. doesn't say anything worth listening to. Niether the entire liberal talk circuit for that matter. Ratings and failings prove it. People are smarter than that. SO the only tactic they have is to attack the person and not her words.11 Bravo wrote:
why are we talking about ann coulter? you guys are so sad to create a thread about her. its just like people who cry about bill o. pathetic.
I don't believe so, but it was mentioned earlier in the thread and I haven't quite mastered the whole copy/paste thing with the iPhone yet to reference it properly. My apologies.eleven bravo wrote:
the ACLU deals with canadian issues?
Lol what a statement especially from you.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
What is so disgusting about her?DesertFox- wrote:
Ugh the more I learn about her, the more disgusted I become. Seems you're a liberal if you don't agree with her, though.
I still don't understand what the hell is wrong with some of you that makes another you go batshit when someone else thinks differently than you.