we would have golfers and fags who listen to heavy metal and screamo shit
oh dear god
imagine if that would have happened
oh dear god
imagine if that would have happened
you'd probably be a nuclear scientist not a azn g4ngbang3r=NHB=Shadow wrote:
we would have golfers and fags who listen to heavy metal and screamo shit
oh dear god
imagine if that would have happened
an azn*Hurricane2k9 wrote:
you'd probably be a nuclear scientist not a azn g4ngbang3r=NHB=Shadow wrote:
we would have golfers and fags who listen to heavy metal and screamo shit
oh dear god
imagine if that would have happened
trolling is a artSuperior Mind wrote:
an azn*Hurricane2k9 wrote:
you'd probably be a nuclear scientist not a azn g4ngbang3r=NHB=Shadow wrote:
we would have golfers and fags who listen to heavy metal and screamo shit
oh dear god
imagine if that would have happened
tru storyMorpheus wrote:
trolling is a artSuperior Mind wrote:
an azn*Hurricane2k9 wrote:
you'd probably be a nuclear scientist not a azn g4ngbang3r
don't you mean "an art?"Morpheus wrote:
trolling is a artSuperior Mind wrote:
an azn*Hurricane2k9 wrote:
you'd probably be a nuclear scientist not a azn g4ngbang3r
KKK would still exist... They did really hate micks, krauts, jews and anything non-WASP.FEOS wrote:
There would've been more european slaves called indentured servants.
Civil war would probably still have happened, as it wasn't about slavery, it was about state's rights and different priorities in economics. Slavery was one issue where the underlying problems came to the forefront.
Homogeneity would probably still be an issue, just with different skin tones.
Wouldn't have happened if Americans hadn't bought them.Morpheus wrote:
well, the US never actually did any (major) slave trading.... it was all those silly Europeans who actually brought people across the pond...
although, they wouldn't have been able to bring anyone if the African warlords didn't sell them any...
I also think you need better grammar.
You know, being a philosopher and all.
Um... Haiti and various other colonies?Dilbert_X wrote:
Wouldn't have happened if Americans hadn't bought them.Morpheus wrote:
well, the US never actually did any (major) slave trading.... it was all those silly Europeans who actually brought people across the pond...
although, they wouldn't have been able to bring anyone if the African warlords didn't sell them any...
I also think you need better grammar.
You know, being a philosopher and all.
On topic:
The US would be a minor nation at the olympics.
Only white people would be in porn.
I mainly watch white people pr0n anyway....Dilbert_X wrote:
Wouldn't have happened if Americans hadn't bought them.Morpheus wrote:
well, the US never actually did any (major) slave trading.... it was all those silly Europeans who actually brought people across the pond...
although, they wouldn't have been able to bring anyone if the African warlords didn't sell them any...
I also think you need better grammar.
You know, being a philosopher and all.
On topic:
The US would be a minor nation at the olympics.
Only white people would be in porn.
It like to put a 12 gauge into the heads of people who believe that 9-11 was done by the US government.eleven bravo wrote:
we would enslave venture capitalist who believe 9/11 was an inside job
Last edited by -Sh1fty- (2010-03-22 09:43:20)
While I would agree that economics were the basis behind the Civil War, the conflicts themselves never would have been as severe without slavery. Abolitionism was basically the straw that broke the camel's back when it came to relations between the North and the South. Without a conflict over which new territories would become slave or free states, there would be much less provocation towards war.FEOS wrote:
There would've been more european slaves called indentured servants.
Civil war would probably still have happened, as it wasn't about slavery, it was about state's rights and different priorities in economics. Slavery was one issue where the underlying problems came to the forefront.
Homogeneity would probably still be an issue, just with different skin tones.
fixedDilbert_X wrote:
Wouldn't have happened if Americans Europeans and the Arabs before them hadn't bought them.Morpheus wrote:
well, the US never actually did any (major) slave trading.... it was all those silly Europeans who actually brought people across the pond...
although, they wouldn't have been able to bring anyone if the African warlords didn't sell them any...
I also think you need better grammar.
You know, being a philosopher and all.
Naitivists will still form their own gang... Lots of anti-non-WASP talk during large immigration times in the 1880s. Gangs like the KKK would still be created.Turquoise wrote:
While I would agree that economics were the basis behind the Civil War, the conflicts themselves never would have been as severe without slavery. Abolitionism was basically the straw that broke the camel's back when it came to relations between the North and the South. Without a conflict over which new territories would become slave or free states, there would be much less provocation towards war.FEOS wrote:
There would've been more european slaves called indentured servants.
Civil war would probably still have happened, as it wasn't about slavery, it was about state's rights and different priorities in economics. Slavery was one issue where the underlying problems came to the forefront.
Homogeneity would probably still be an issue, just with different skin tones.
As for the KKK, that group didn't even form until after the Civil War. Without a Civil War, there would be no reason to create the KKK.
I can agree with that. We've unfortunately had numerous groups that are similar to the KKK.Cybargs wrote:
Naitivists will still form their own gang... Lots of anti-non-WASP talk during large immigration times in the 1880s. Gangs like the KKK would still be created.Turquoise wrote:
While I would agree that economics were the basis behind the Civil War, the conflicts themselves never would have been as severe without slavery. Abolitionism was basically the straw that broke the camel's back when it came to relations between the North and the South. Without a conflict over which new territories would become slave or free states, there would be much less provocation towards war.FEOS wrote:
There would've been more european slaves called indentured servants.
Civil war would probably still have happened, as it wasn't about slavery, it was about state's rights and different priorities in economics. Slavery was one issue where the underlying problems came to the forefront.
Homogeneity would probably still be an issue, just with different skin tones.
As for the KKK, that group didn't even form until after the Civil War. Without a Civil War, there would be no reason to create the KKK.
We then you better start shooting people who have half a brain.-Sh1fty- wrote:
It like to put a 12 gauge into the heads of people who believe that 9-11 was done by the US government.eleven bravo wrote:
we would enslave venture capitalist who believe 9/11 was an inside job
You know, I had always wondered why people believed in that sort of thing. I think you just answered it though.LostFate wrote:
We then you better start shooting people who have half a brain.-Sh1fty- wrote:
It like to put a 12 gauge into the heads of people who believe that 9-11 was done by the US government.eleven bravo wrote:
we would enslave venture capitalist who believe 9/11 was an inside job