Patriot missiles aren't able to fly into the edges of space, they don't have the capacity to, they also wouldn't have the speed to chase down and intercontinental missile.ATG wrote:
Why? Are they delivered on stealth carrier pigeons?Vilham wrote:
Except patriot missles cant shoot down nukes. Hence why that doesnt make sense.
Any missile can in theory be shot down.
But, if we were serious about national security we would dissolve the fed and deport illegal aliens. We don't, therefor we are not and this is all bullshit.
Patriots are designed to get them on the way up or the way down, not at the edge of space, hence the desire to have the at mother bears gates.
sure....go get a bottle rocket.ATG wrote:
Why? Are they delivered on stealth carrier pigeons?Vilham wrote:
Except patriot missles cant shoot down nukes. Hence why that doesnt make sense.
Any missile can in theory be shot down.
But, if we were serious about national security we would dissolve the fed and deport illegal aliens. We don't, therefor we are not and this is all bullshit.
*You may post 1 second ago
Patriot missiles were just a propaganda piece used during the Gulf War. They only had a hit rate of maybe 10% on slow as fuck Scud missiles. Against ICBMs they wouldn't stand a chance.ATG wrote:
Patriots are designed to get them on the way up or the way down, not at the edge of space, hence the desire to have the at mother bears gates.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
ICBM's are not the only source of delivery for nuclear warheads, and I'm pretty sure Patriots can hit long-range bombers therefore creating potential threat for Russia's ability to respond if being hit. Dont forget that cold war was 'cold' only because there was some sort of balance - you werent able to safely nuke your opponent without recieving adequate ammount of nukes on your head. Deployment of Patriots in Poland certainly doesn't eliminate Russia's ability for nuclear responce, but theoretically it does some damage to that ability. What I'm trying to say is that I believe that things are ok as they are now, when both Russia & US/allies have reasonable ammount of nukes and ability to launch them at each other and sane enough leaders that will never do it. If one side would lose a capability of nuclear responce balance will be ruined and in a no time we all might get screwed.ATG wrote:
Patriots are designed to get them on the way up or the way down, not at the edge of space, hence the desire to have the at mother bears gates.
Last edited by Longbow (2010-02-23 09:27:55)
next we'll hear of an american deep cover agent taking part in a terrorist massacre of russians in an airport....
Patriots will have difficulty stopping anything like this.
googled.M.O.A.B wrote:
http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/28748 … esting.jpg
Patriots will have difficulty stopping anything like this.
Testing at the Kwajalein Atoll of the Peacekeeper re-entry vehicles, all eight fired from only one missile. With live warheads, each line would represent the explosive power of twenty Hiroshima-sized (Little Boy) nuclear weapons.
looks liked they retired the peacekeepers and put all the warheads into minutemen III's though.
I ahree that it doesnt seems likely that they could stop those.
Technically I think they could. But patriots are a point defense weapon. If the warheads were falling on Warsaw, the Patriots might be able to intercept a small percentage. If the warheads were over flying Poland on their way to say Berlin, Patriots would have absolutely no chance. Anyone who is saying that this would have even a minute effect on MAD is quite frankly talking out of their ass. Do some research.RTHKI wrote:
googled.M.O.A.B wrote:
http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/28748 … esting.jpg
Patriots will have difficulty stopping anything like this.
Testing at the Kwajalein Atoll of the Peacekeeper re-entry vehicles, all eight fired from only one missile. With live warheads, each line would represent the explosive power of twenty Hiroshima-sized (Little Boy) nuclear weapons.
looks liked they retired the peacekeepers and put all the warheads into minutemen III's though.
I ahree that it doesnt seems likely that they could stop those.
this is the right question everybody ignored, man. poland' nato membership alone protect them better than patriot batteries ever could. there's also absolutely nothing to defend with those batteries in poland. yet.Dilbert_X wrote:
So why are they being put there?
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
They don't like Iran possessing them, regardless.Dilbert_X wrote:
Which is why they feel threatened by Iran possessing them.FEOS wrote:
No. They recognize that those missiles would make taking out the REAL threat (nuke sites) that much more difficult.Dilbert_X wrote:
The Israelis feel threatened by the S300s apparently.
But here's a clue: Nobody likes anyone possessing them because they are nasty as fuck SAMs. Period. But they're not OFFENSIVE. And nobody is stupid enough to claim that they are or that that's why they don't like people having them.
Because Poland is part of NATO and the Patriot is essentially the NATO standard for SAMs? Ensures interoperability with other NATO countries? Replaces antiquated Soviet-era equipment that is not interoperable with NATO equipment?Dilbert_X wrote:
So why are they being put there?
Just off the top of the noggin...
Last edited by FEOS (2010-02-24 04:25:55)
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Thats all terrific but what threat exactly are the Patriots there to defend against?FEOS wrote:
Because Poland is part of NATO and the Patriot is essentially the NATO standard for SAMs? Ensures interoperability with other NATO countries? Replaces antiquated Soviet-era equipment that is not interoperable with NATO equipment?
Fuck Israel
What is any military unit there to defend against? Gotta be ready for any/everything. 99% of the time there isn't a specific threat.Dilbert_X wrote:
Thats all terrific but what threat exactly are the Patriots there to defend against?FEOS wrote:
Because Poland is part of NATO and the Patriot is essentially the NATO standard for SAMs? Ensures interoperability with other NATO countries? Replaces antiquated Soviet-era equipment that is not interoperable with NATO equipment?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Speaking of Poland, I'm 99% certain that the threat is ruskies. Unless new bloody Hitler comes to power in Germany...JohnG@lt wrote:
What is any military unit there to defend against? Gotta be ready for any/everything. 99% of the time there isn't a specific threat.
Sure, why not? Anyway, there's nothing illegal about Poland wanting to defend itself. If a battery of Patriot missiles helps the people of that country sleep at night then that's all that really matters in the grand scheme of things isn't it? Any governments primary mission is to protect it's citizens from outward harm, Poland seems to be doing just that.Longbow wrote:
Speaking of Poland, I'm 99% certain that the threat is ruskies. Unless new bloody Hitler comes to power in Germany...JohnG@lt wrote:
What is any military unit there to defend against? Gotta be ready for any/everything. 99% of the time there isn't a specific threat.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
I'm not so sure that Polish people do want to have those missiles in their country. Might be their goverment & US goverment. Just conducting parallels with our goverment that is (or was, idk what new president will do) trying to drive Ukraine into NATO while the majority of population was against that.JohnG@lt wrote:
Sure, why not? Anyway, there's nothing illegal about Poland wanting to defend itself. If a battery of Patriot missiles helps the people of that country sleep at night then that's all that really matters in the grand scheme of things isn't it? Any governments primary mission is to protect it's citizens from outward harm, Poland seems to be doing just that.
Im sure they would rather have no defense in case Russia feels like raping (literally and figuratively) the shit out of their country again.Longbow wrote:
I'm not so sure that Polish people do want to have those missiles in their country. Might be their goverment & US goverment. Just conducting parallels with our goverment that is (or was, idk what new president will do) trying to drive Ukraine into NATO while the majority of population was against that.JohnG@lt wrote:
Sure, why not? Anyway, there's nothing illegal about Poland wanting to defend itself. If a battery of Patriot missiles helps the people of that country sleep at night then that's all that really matters in the grand scheme of things isn't it? Any governments primary mission is to protect it's citizens from outward harm, Poland seems to be doing just that.
Under current circumstances possibilty that Russia would act agressively towards ex-eastern block countries is miserably low. Modern Russia is about trading gas and oil, not ideology.Vilham wrote:
Im sure they would rather have no defense in case Russia feels like raping (literally and figuratively) the shit out of their country again.
Why did you guys vote out the hottie with the braids?Longbow wrote:
I'm not so sure that Polish people do want to have those missiles in their country. Might be their goverment & US goverment. Just conducting parallels with our goverment that is (or was, idk what new president will do) trying to drive Ukraine into NATO while the majority of population was against that.JohnG@lt wrote:
Sure, why not? Anyway, there's nothing illegal about Poland wanting to defend itself. If a battery of Patriot missiles helps the people of that country sleep at night then that's all that really matters in the grand scheme of things isn't it? Any governments primary mission is to protect it's citizens from outward harm, Poland seems to be doing just that.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
She's power hungry bitch that cares only about own enrichment. Teh gangsta that became a president aint much different anyway.JohnG@lt wrote:
Why did you guys vote out the hottie with the braids?
protip: I didn't vote
their nato membership is all the defence they'd ever need.Vilham wrote:
Im sure they would rather have no defense in case Russia feels like raping (literally and figuratively) the shit out of their country again.Longbow wrote:
I'm not so sure that Polish people do want to have those missiles in their country. Might be their goverment & US goverment. Just conducting parallels with our goverment that is (or was, idk what new president will do) trying to drive Ukraine into NATO while the majority of population was against that.JohnG@lt wrote:
Sure, why not? Anyway, there's nothing illegal about Poland wanting to defend itself. If a battery of Patriot missiles helps the people of that country sleep at night then that's all that really matters in the grand scheme of things isn't it? Any governments primary mission is to protect it's citizens from outward harm, Poland seems to be doing just that.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
By the time NATO reaches them its a bit late, and if NATO doesn't provide on the spot defense to its members it makes it look weak and hard to take seriously.
You just described every politician in the entire world.Longbow wrote:
She's power hungry bitch that cares only about own enrichment. Teh gangsta that became a president aint much different anyway.JohnG@lt wrote:
Why did you guys vote out the hottie with the braids?
protip: I didn't vote
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
really? when was the last time you lookerd at the world map, dude?Vilham wrote:
By the time NATO reaches them its a bit late, and if NATO doesn't provide on the spot defense to its members it makes it look weak and hard to take seriously.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Indeed... Lithuania, Belarus and Ukraine all buffer Poland. You guys do have the area around Königsberg though shahter... Should really give that back to Germany one of these years...Shahter wrote:
really? when was the last time you lookerd at the world map, dude?Vilham wrote:
By the time NATO reaches them its a bit late, and if NATO doesn't provide on the spot defense to its members it makes it look weak and hard to take seriously.
Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-02-24 07:07:36)
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat