When trying to win a debate, it's probably best not to mention that.ATG wrote:
I aactually went to the booth and voted for bush twice becaause that was the logical choice at the time.
All your tectonic plates are belong to us
When are choices are a hairy asshole and a shaved one there isn't much cause for shame.Turquoise wrote:
When trying to win a debate, it's probably best not to mention that.ATG wrote:
I aactually went to the booth and voted for bush twice becaause that was the logical choice at the time.
At least I voted.
Well, if you hate the big two, you can always vote third party... I voted Nader in 2000.ATG wrote:
When are choices are a hairy asshole and a shaved one there isn't much cause for shame.Turquoise wrote:
When trying to win a debate, it's probably best not to mention that.ATG wrote:
I aactually went to the booth and voted for bush twice becaause that was the logical choice at the time.
At least I voted.
When trying to win a debate, it's probably best not to mention that.Turquoise wrote:
Well, if you hate the big two, you can always vote third party... I voted Nader in 2000.ATG wrote:
When are choices are a hairy asshole and a shaved one there isn't much cause for shame.Turquoise wrote:
When trying to win a debate, it's probably best not to mention that.
At least I voted.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
What? That I actually voted? Good point... in hindsight, it was a waste of time.FEOS wrote:
When trying to win a debate, it's probably best not to mention that.Turquoise wrote:
Well, if you hate the big two, you can always vote third party... I voted Nader in 2000.ATG wrote:
When are choices are a hairy asshole and a shaved one there isn't much cause for shame.
At least I voted.
The Electoral College chooses the president, so admittedly, voting for any presidential candidate is rather irrelevant.
No...that you voted for Nader.Turquoise wrote:
What? That I actually voted? Good point... in hindsight, it was a waste of time.FEOS wrote:
When trying to win a debate, it's probably best not to mention that.Turquoise wrote:
Well, if you hate the big two, you can always vote third party... I voted Nader in 2000.
The Electoral College chooses the president, so admittedly, voting for any presidential candidate is rather irrelevant.
The Electoral College chooses the President based on the popular vote in their district, so the votes cast are quite relevant. You're just bent out of shape because the EC prevents straight popular vote from ruling the day...as it was designed to do.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Getting off topic... but we're pretty close to doing away with the EC altogether.FEOS wrote:
No...that you voted for Nader.Turquoise wrote:
What? That I actually voted? Good point... in hindsight, it was a waste of time.FEOS wrote:
When trying to win a debate, it's probably best not to mention that.
The Electoral College chooses the president, so admittedly, voting for any presidential candidate is rather irrelevant.
The Electoral College chooses the President based on the popular vote in their district, so the votes cast are quite relevant. You're just bent out of shape because the EC prevents straight popular vote from ruling the day...as it was designed to do.
http://www.electoral-college.org/pages/explanation.php
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
indeed well said I wouldn't doubt it if the U.S. had that weaponTurquoise wrote:
What? That I actually voted? Good point... in hindsight, it was a waste of time.FEOS wrote:
When trying to win a debate, it's probably best not to mention that.Turquoise wrote:
Well, if you hate the big two, you can always vote third party... I voted Nader in 2000.
The Electoral College chooses the president, so admittedly, voting for any presidential candidate is rather irrelevant.
Hugo Chavez is one whacked-out mother fucker.
Being bent out of shape would imply that I still care...FEOS wrote:
No...that you voted for Nader.Turquoise wrote:
What? That I actually voted? Good point... in hindsight, it was a waste of time.FEOS wrote:
When trying to win a debate, it's probably best not to mention that.
The Electoral College chooses the president, so admittedly, voting for any presidential candidate is rather irrelevant.
The Electoral College chooses the President based on the popular vote in their district, so the votes cast are quite relevant. You're just bent out of shape because the EC prevents straight popular vote from ruling the day...as it was designed to do.
- Sent a merchant ship full of civillians across the Atlantic even though the german press warned they would be destroyed if they did to start WW1
- new about the japanese fleet days before pearl harbour but did nothing to enter WW2
- said that north vietnam had attacks US patrol boats to start the vietnam conflict - even though its now known that it never even happened.
- WMD? they never even existed as we all know now, planes crashes that don't leave rubble - to enter IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN
- a quick earth quake to practice a new shiny weapon and invade another country , I would'nt put it past them, then again it could be all bollocks and the US Has a LARGE military presence there to help , I know i like to think so
- new about the japanese fleet days before pearl harbour but did nothing to enter WW2
- said that north vietnam had attacks US patrol boats to start the vietnam conflict - even though its now known that it never even happened.
- WMD? they never even existed as we all know now, planes crashes that don't leave rubble - to enter IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN
- a quick earth quake to practice a new shiny weapon and invade another country , I would'nt put it past them, then again it could be all bollocks and the US Has a LARGE military presence there to help , I know i like to think so
Last edited by LostFate (2010-02-21 06:06:09)
Holy tin-foil hat Batman.LostFate wrote:
- Sent a merchant ship full of civillians across the Atlantic even though the german press warned they would be destroyed if they did to start WW1
- new about the japanese fleet days before pearl harbour but did nothing to enter WW2
- said that north vietnam had attacks US patrol boats to start the vietnam conflict - even though its now known that it never even happened.
- WMD? they never even existed as we all know now, planes crashes that don't leave rubble - to enter IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN
- a quick earth quake to practice a new shiny weapon and invade another country , I would'nt put it past them, then again it could be all bollocks and the US Has a LARGE military presence there to help , I know i like to think so
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has deployed troops to areas near the Colombian border and says he is reviewing plans for a potential war as tension between the two nations rises.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
colombia would whoop that ass
Tu Stultus Es
Chavez has better guns though, and more of them.eleven bravo wrote:
colombia would whoop that ass
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6978
But according to Pace the worst Colombian is being put in jail.eleven bravo wrote:
colombia would whoop that ass
If Columbia would just turn over their TV/News stations to Chavez I'm sure he would be just fine.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Colombia's military manpower is twice as large if Wiki's to be believed.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Chavez has better guns though, and more of them.eleven bravo wrote:
colombia would whoop that ass
Haiti was just a test, lets destroy the ME and call it a day.
The key difference is that Colombia's military knows how to use theirs. And does...regularly.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Chavez has better guns though, and more of them.eleven bravo wrote:
colombia would whoop that ass
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Venezuela is respectable...FEOS wrote:
The key difference is that Colombia's military knows how to use theirs. And does...regularly.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Chavez has better guns though, and more of them.eleven bravo wrote:
colombia would whoop that ass
the only significant thing the venezuelan military has done within the last few decades are military coups as far as i know. colombia has been fighting narco terrorist and marxist guerrillas longer than anyone posting here has been alive.Commie Killer wrote:
Venezuela is respectable...FEOS wrote:
The key difference is that Colombia's military knows how to use theirs. And does...regularly.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Chavez has better guns though, and more of them.
Tu Stultus Es
The man speaks truth.eleven bravo wrote:
the only significant thing the venezuelan military has done within the last few decades are military coups as far as i know. colombia has been fighting narco terrorist and marxist guerrillas longer than anyone posting here has been alive.Commie Killer wrote:
Venezuela is respectable...FEOS wrote:
The key difference is that Colombia's military knows how to use theirs. And does...regularly.
Having neat toys and actually being able to use them...two completely different things.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Agreed, but, its not like the Colombians really have any experience in conventional warfare, and reportedly (wiki ftw), the Venezuelan military is rather well trained and led(not including the very high levels). Should be an interesting match until we jump in, if it ever happened anyways.FEOS wrote:
The man speaks truth.eleven bravo wrote:
the only significant thing the venezuelan military has done within the last few decades are military coups as far as i know. colombia has been fighting narco terrorist and marxist guerrillas longer than anyone posting here has been alive.Commie Killer wrote:
Venezuela is respectable...
Having neat toys and actually being able to use them...two completely different things.