Oh noes. Brainwashed.JakAttaK wrote:
Then we were made to watch a video on abortion in school and I'm not so sure anymore.
Na, I don't think it's completely wrong and the whole process should be stopped.
I'm just not comfortable tearing up a baby and pulling it out of someones vagina. Alot of the time, the skull is too hard to crush, so they pull it off the body and out in one piece. Sounds a tiny bit wrong no?
I'm just not comfortable tearing up a baby and pulling it out of someones vagina. Alot of the time, the skull is too hard to crush, so they pull it off the body and out in one piece. Sounds a tiny bit wrong no?
It's not a baby. Or a human. Or something that has any active brainwaves. It's a bit of growing tissue.
I'm only pro-choice for cases of rape, incest or where the mother's life is in danger.
...but this is a topic for another thread.
More depressing talk about how the female race will one day enslave us all, and Mila Kunis' eyes will be President.
...but this is a topic for another thread.
More depressing talk about how the female race will one day enslave us all, and Mila Kunis' eyes will be President.
Yeah man, I crush fetus skulls for fun.
That's why you're paying a doctor to do the operation rather than do it yourself.
That's why you're paying a doctor to do the operation rather than do it yourself.
Those stupid educational videos should give an unbiased opinion, not a
"OH MY GOD, IT'S A BABY, YOU'RE KILLING A FUCKING BABY. MURDERER".
"OH MY GOD, IT'S A BABY, YOU'RE KILLING A FUCKING BABY. MURDERER".
I don't think it's murder, and I'm also of the opinion it's not a human. But for some reason I just thought it was done another way. So it kinda shocked me when I learnt that. Would still support the idea of an abortion, but it would literally be the last thing. Guess that's how it's meant to be though.
On with the topic.
I'm pretty much over the whole checking her facebook thing. Easier than I thought. So yeh
On with the topic.
I'm pretty much over the whole checking her facebook thing. Easier than I thought. So yeh
I think during the first trimester it's ok. After that I find it a lot harder to justify (except in cases of rape/incest/risk of loss of life for mother, etc). Because it definitely seems like some sort of living being. Premature birth babies are pretty well-formed, despite needing to be on life support for a while until they're at what would have been 9 months in the womb. The only difference between a premature baby and an aborted, late-term fetus is one depends on a human, the other on machinery (and humans to watch the machinery and administer medicines).
Oh and she's on the pill. Not sure which pill, but it's supposed to also help keep her periods shorter and less intense (she'd always get into a really depressed mood during her period... which I guess is better for me than the stereotypical "crazy bitch" but it sucked for her ).
Oh and she's on the pill. Not sure which pill, but it's supposed to also help keep her periods shorter and less intense (she'd always get into a really depressed mood during her period... which I guess is better for me than the stereotypical "crazy bitch" but it sucked for her ).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2ca0/d2ca007866341ba9160987e2e30bf16ee18676fc" alt="https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg"
Zimmer wrote:
Or we could just all have gay sex.Poseidon wrote:
I know it's a quote from your average middle school sex ed class, but abstinence really is the only 100% surefire way to prevent pregnancy.
Hurri, birth control's awesome. Unless you're extremely negative towards it, don't worry.
It didn't work for the virgin Mary.Poseidon wrote:
I know it's a quote from your average middle school sex ed class, but abstinence really is the only 100% surefire way to prevent pregnancy.
The shape of an eye in front of the ocean, digging for stones and throwing them against its window pane. Take it down dreamer, take it down deep. - Other Families
just think about it this way
price of a baby vs the price of pills//condoms//your youth HMMMMM
price of a baby vs the price of pills//condoms//your youth HMMMMM
Wait, I'm slightly confused. Are you trying to say a baby is more expensive than my youth? And likewise, that my youth is worth as much as pills?Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
just think about it this way
price of a baby vs the price of pills//condoms//your youth HMMMMM
The shape of an eye in front of the ocean, digging for stones and throwing them against its window pane. Take it down dreamer, take it down deep. - Other Families
No, quite obviously the price of a baby >= (Price of pills)*(Price of condoms)*(Price of your youth)
lolz face melts. you 'get it'. smart peeps.
You see, I would object to this rudimentary formulation on the grounds that my youth is, in fact, more valuable than the cost of the baby to start with. Of course I am measuring my youth in term of rarity, seeing as my youth occurs but once, while I can have multiple babies.Bevo wrote:
No, quite obviously the price of a baby >= (Price of pills)*(Price of condoms)*(Price of your youth)
The shape of an eye in front of the ocean, digging for stones and throwing them against its window pane. Take it down dreamer, take it down deep. - Other Families
Sounds like you should be mad at the price of pills and condoms then. If you paid material cost for each, their coefficients would drop below 1 and increase the price of your youth over the price of a baby.Pochsy wrote:
You see, I would object to this rudimentary formulation on the grounds that my youth is, in fact, more valuable than the cost of the baby to start with. Of course I am measuring my youth in term of rarity, seeing as my youth occurs but once, while I can have multiple babies.Bevo wrote:
No, quite obviously the price of a baby >= (Price of pills)*(Price of condoms)*(Price of your youth)
Your reasoning however is flawed, the price of your youth seems to be measured in $ whereas the price of a baby is $^3. You cannot compare them on a 1:1 basis.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c5cf/8c5cf7ecea91192a39c3ac6677bb31ab9ab47a6b" alt="https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v448/ipalatt/die_thread_die.jpg"
Macbeth wrote:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v448/ … ad_die.jpg
and apparently, we've come to the right place. should rename the sight "bfs4eva.com".Zimmer wrote:
Or we could just all have gay sex.Poseidon wrote:
I know it's a quote from your average middle school sex ed class, but abstinence really is the only 100% surefire way to prevent pregnancy.
jesus since when did girl problems become abortion-debate central?
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
seriously.Uzique wrote:
jesus since when did girl problems become abortion-debate central?
i was reading your girls probelm then all of the sudden turn into an abortion debate.
D&ST ------------------------------> that way
In Maryland one parent has to be informed if you're under 18 I think.Zimmer wrote:
If she gets pregnant she has the legal right to keep that information from her parents. You are both legal and of age to decide for yourselves, so she can decide to have an abortion without her parents knowing.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Yeah I worry about it mostly because 1) she's 16 2) that'd mean scandal 3) her parents would sodomize me with branding irons 4) i can't afford a fuckin' kidJakAttaK wrote:
Yeh. No birth control is 100% effective. That said, I'm one of the people who worries about that shit. I don't want any chance of a kid. Others will probs tell you not to worry about it though.
But I'd love to go bareback, especially since I often start losing my wood while I fuck around with putting on the condom. And idk, I figure if we do it on days where she's least fertile (girls have some sort of calculus that lets them figure out when their periods start/end, etc) it also helps mitigate the risk.
also inb4statutory, 16 is legal in Maryland
And who said the pill isn't 100% effective? It's 99.99999% effective, so whatever you do, she ain't gonna get pregnant man.
Wait, you said birth control, what exactly do you mean by that? Damn you're vague. Birth control can be any means of hormonal or physical method, you need to be specific. If she's on the contraceptive pill, you can bareback as much as you want without any fear.
And what krazed said, get her to put it on. Or get her to suck you off whilst you take it out of the wrapper or get it ready.
She's probably taking Yaz or Yasmin then. Only 2 tips I have on this subject are:Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Oh and she's on the pill. Not sure which pill, but it's supposed to also help keep her periods shorter and less intense (she'd always get into a really depressed mood during her period... which I guess is better for me than the stereotypical "crazy bitch" but it sucked for her ).
1. If you want to be confident about it, make sure you can trust her to take the pill everyday, and at the same time everyday for maximum effectiveness.
2. Don't freak out if she doesn't get her period right away on the "off-week" (the week she doesn't take the pill, or takes a sugar pill) because it might not come until the second to last or even last day of the "period week." You will waste a lot of time sweating over nothing. And possibly a substantial amount of money on pregnancy tests.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ae60/1ae605329b796a3c55f06f576cb8e43d3bc5f61e" alt="https://i45.tinypic.com/2eoigzn.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78bee/78beeb000139f0d5d6c3caf1415cd42d5fac00dc" alt="https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png"