CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6841
OK folks, for posterity, it's time to test the D&ST posters' powers of prediction. For the following eight current affairs/hot topics please state in clear and unambiguous terms what you believe will be the situation with respect to each in exactly two years time.

1) The western occupation of Afghanistan.

2) The western occupation of Iraq.

3) The Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

4) Iran's nuclear capability and its relationship with the rest of the world.

5) The global economy.

6) The economic and political situation in Venezuela.

7) The political situation on the Korean peninsula.

8) International agreement on climate change and actions designed to combat it (or not, as the case may be).
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5523|Cleveland, Ohio
1)  still there

2)  still there

3)  what occupation?

4)  no change

5)  the rich will get richer, poor will get more poor

6)  no idea

7)  no change

8)  still a scam so no change
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5644|London, England

CameronPoe wrote:

OK folks, for posterity, it's time to test the D&ST posters' powers of prediction. For the following eight current affairs/hot topics please state in clear and unambiguous terms what you believe will be the situation with respect to each in exactly two years time.

1) The western occupation of Afghanistan.

2) The western occupation of Iraq.

3) The Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

4) Iran's nuclear capability and its relationship with the rest of the world.

5) The global economy.

6) The economic and political situation in Venezuela.

7) The political situation on the Korean peninsula.

8) International agreement on climate change and actions designed to combat it (or not, as the case may be).
We'll still be in Afghanistan but the conflict will be winding down and the troops will be on their way home for the most part.

We'll have pulled out of Iraq completely and a small scale civil war instigated by Iran will be simmering.

The Israeli situation will remain unchanged from today.

Iran will have tested a nuclear weapon, established itself as a nuclear power and formed a defensive alliance with Russia and China to offset NATO.

The economy will be on the rebound once again after hitting another brick wall in 2011. Countries will clamp down even further on economic freedom, exacerbating the situation and pushing us to the brink of another global depression.

Venezuela will experience Zimbabwe-esque spiraling inflation and will reach out to the China/Russia/Iran alliance for help. Chavez will rule with an iron fist to maintain power.

Kim Jong Il will be dead, the succession will spark a civil war that will lead to NK either opening up it's borders or starting a war with South Korea in order to gain legitimacy.

The world will have been too worried about other matters to bother cowtowing to the greenies on climate change.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6392|eXtreme to the maX
1) The western occupation of Afghanistan.
Will still be occupied, mainly to allow access to Pakistan. Kabul just about under control, remainder by warlords, Taliban either bribed off or continuing low-level attrition attacks.

2) The western occupation of Iraq.
Essentially ended.

3) The Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
Expanded and cemented, probably with Israel controlling all of West Bank borders similar to Gaza.

4) Iran's nuclear capability and its relationship with the rest of the world.
Civilian program operating and producing power, military program still scattered and unknown.

5) The global economy.
Back to 'normal', highly dependent on decisions made by China.

6) The economic and political situation in Venezuela.
Chaos, maybe taken over by US backed strongman.

7) The political situation on the Korean peninsula.
No change. Unless they nuke another country no-one is interested enough to do anything.

8) International agreement on climate change and actions designed to combat it (or not, as the case may be).
None, China continuing to expand emissions significantly and not interested in curbing them. US not prepared to give up standard of living or political donations which flow from the oil companies.
If US and China won't do anything there is zero point in the rest of us trying.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-01-26 16:50:20)

Fuck Israel
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5872

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/_rku6deQBORg/SbPXQZgLhTI/AAAAAAAAGKA/HMS5sQh9j74/S768/2012Doomsday2008.jpg
We're all gonna die!
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6961|Canberra, AUS

CameronPoe wrote:

OK folks, for posterity, it's time to test the D&ST posters' powers of prediction. For the following eight current affairs/hot topics please state in clear and unambiguous terms what you believe will be the situation with respect to each in exactly two years time.

1) The western occupation of Afghanistan.
Same or winding down

2) The western occupation of Iraq.
Winding down if not over

3) The Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
Unchanged

4) Iran's nuclear capability and its relationship with the rest of the world.
I have a strange feeling half the country could blow up into a civil war sometime soon.

5) The global economy.
Will improve, slowly

6) The economic and political situation in Venezuela.
Will continue to go down the toilet

7) The political situation on the Korean peninsula.
Can't see too much happening here

8) International agreement on climate change and actions designed to combat it (or not, as the case may be).
doubt we'll see a big broad international agreement. probably more individual states taking some initiative, others tagging along and standardization coming along more by backroom assent more than anything else.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6392|eXtreme to the maX
New contagious and lethal disease wipes out half of humanity, incubated in black crack-using hookers and initially transmitted via buttsecks.
Information sketchy but Patient Zero identified as 'Macbeth'.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-01-27 03:55:53)

Fuck Israel
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6697|'Murka

CameronPoe wrote:

OK folks, for posterity, it's time to test the D&ST posters' powers of prediction. For the following eight current affairs/hot topics please state in clear and unambiguous terms what you believe will be the situation with respect to each in exactly two years time.

1) The western occupation of Afghanistan.
    Not an occupation.

    NATO/ISAF will still be there, but with reduced representation as troop withdrawal will have begun. Taliban influence will be limited to South, much degraded over today.


2) The western occupation of Iraq.
    Not an occupation.

     Forces limited to support (training, logistics, advisors, etc) mostly. Some spikes in violence accompany US combat troop withdrawal as Iraqi troops take over. Some reports of questionable tactics from Iraqi forces in dealing with it.


3) The Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
    No change

4) Iran's nuclear capability and its relationship with the rest of the world.
    Degraded relations and/or sanctions. Very good chance of strikes against Iranian nuke sites by Israel if diplomatic efforts do not work. Decent chance of civil unrest.

5) The global economy.
    Better, but not nearly as good as we saw in 2000s. Continued weak dollar due to ridiculous debt.

6) The economic and political situation in Venezuela.
    Worsening. As much as Chavez might be trying to do the right thing, he's clueless to reality.

7) The political situation on the Korean peninsula.
    If the Chonger lives, no change. If he dies, improvement.

8) International agreement on climate change and actions designed to combat it (or not, as the case may be).
    No agreement on man-made global warming. Minimal agreement on actions to combat climate change.

Last edited by FEOS (2010-01-27 03:53:46)

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6576|Éire

FEOS wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

OK folks, for posterity, it's time to test the D&ST posters' powers of prediction. For the following eight current affairs/hot topics please state in clear and unambiguous terms what you believe will be the situation with respect to each in exactly two years time.

1) The western occupation of Afghanistan.
    Not an occupation.

    NATO/ISAF will still be there, but with reduced representation as troop withdrawal will have begun. Taliban influence will be limited to South, much degraded over today.


2) The western occupation of Iraq.
    Not an occupation.

     Forces limited to support (training, logistics, advisors, etc) mostly. Some spikes in violence accompany US combat troop withdrawal as Iraqi troops take over. Some reports of questionable tactics from Iraqi forces in dealing with it.


3) The Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
    No change

4) Iran's nuclear capability and its relationship with the rest of the world.
    Degraded relations and/or sanctions. Very good chance of strikes against Iranian nuke sites by Israel if diplomatic efforts do not work. Decent chance of civil unrest.

5) The global economy.
    Better, but not nearly as good as we saw in 2000s. Continued weak dollar due to ridiculous debt.

6) The economic and political situation in Venezuela.
    Worsening. As much as Chavez might be trying to do the right thing, he's clueless to reality.

7) The political situation on the Korean peninsula.
    If the Chonger lives, no change. If he dies, improvement.

8) International agreement on climate change and actions designed to combat it (or not, as the case may be).
    No agreement on man-made global warming. Minimal agreement on actions to combat climate change.
Just out of curiosity FEOS, would you have regarded the Russian war in Afghanistan to have been an occupation?
jord
Member
+2,382|6964|The North, beyond the wall.
I remember when you did the 20 years prediction thread, that was better. 2 years is such a small amount of time, there will be little if any change on those subjects.
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|6951|NT, like Mick Dundee

jord wrote:

I remember when you did the 20 years prediction thread, that was better. 2 years is such a small amount of time, there will be little if any change on those subjects.
Except in two years some of us might be around to have a look at how accurate some people were.

20 years.... Well, if I'm still posting here in 20 years slap me.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6841

FEOS wrote:

1) The western occupation of Afghanistan.
    Not an occupation.

2) The western occupation of Iraq.
    Not an occupation.
Sorry, replace 'western occupation of' with 'current western military presence and civil/political interference in'. Suffix it with ', following imposition of western norms of government'. Semantics are important.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2010-01-27 12:48:06)

13rin
Member
+977|6765
1) In Afghanistan. 

2) Out of Iraq

3) Israel will be going after Iran

4) Iran close to nuclear capability

5) Better off than the US

6) Somebody is going to pop Chavez.

7) New leader for the north as Kim Dong il is dead.

8) Climate change revealed once and for all a scam.  The US still commits 100 billion a year though.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6247|Places 'n such
1) Still there

2) Still there

3) Still there, but with a better hold on it than our hold on Iraqistan.

4) Developing a nuclear weapons program, supported by China, condemned by the West, economic sanctions imposed but fuck all useful being done to control it, possible war with Israel.

5) Still shaky but much improved.

6) Even worse than it currently is, probably a large civil war.

7) Same as it currently is, even if Kim jong il dies he'll be replaced by an identical clone like leader, equally as insane, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Jong-un

8) Large amount of restrictions on Europe imposed by EU, American and Chinese influence on it unchanged despite being the main contributors
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6691|North Carolina
1) The western occupation of Afghanistan.

Still there...  with more troops

2) The western occupation of Iraq.

Still there... with less troops

3) The Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

the same

4) Iran's nuclear capability and its relationship with the rest of the world.

more nukes, less stability

5) The global economy.

more debt, less stability

6) The economic and political situation in Venezuela.

Chavez still there...  economy worse

7) The political situation on the Korean peninsula.

still a standstill

8) International agreement on climate change and actions designed to combat it (or not, as the case may be).

still useless
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6697|'Murka

Braddock wrote:

FEOS wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

OK folks, for posterity, it's time to test the D&ST posters' powers of prediction. For the following eight current affairs/hot topics please state in clear and unambiguous terms what you believe will be the situation with respect to each in exactly two years time.

1) The western occupation of Afghanistan.
    Not an occupation.

    NATO/ISAF will still be there, but with reduced representation as troop withdrawal will have begun. Taliban influence will be limited to South, much degraded over today.


2) The western occupation of Iraq.
    Not an occupation.

     Forces limited to support (training, logistics, advisors, etc) mostly. Some spikes in violence accompany US combat troop withdrawal as Iraqi troops take over. Some reports of questionable tactics from Iraqi forces in dealing with it.


3) The Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
    No change

4) Iran's nuclear capability and its relationship with the rest of the world.
    Degraded relations and/or sanctions. Very good chance of strikes against Iranian nuke sites by Israel if diplomatic efforts do not work. Decent chance of civil unrest.

5) The global economy.
    Better, but not nearly as good as we saw in 2000s. Continued weak dollar due to ridiculous debt.

6) The economic and political situation in Venezuela.
    Worsening. As much as Chavez might be trying to do the right thing, he's clueless to reality.

7) The political situation on the Korean peninsula.
    If the Chonger lives, no change. If he dies, improvement.

8) International agreement on climate change and actions designed to combat it (or not, as the case may be).
    No agreement on man-made global warming. Minimal agreement on actions to combat climate change.
Just out of curiosity FEOS, would you have regarded the Russian war in Afghanistan to have been an occupation?
No.

And to be clear, the initial stages of both Afghanistan and Iraq certainly were occupations. Neither have been so for years.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6697|'Murka

CameronPoe wrote:

FEOS wrote:

1) The western occupation of Afghanistan.
    Not an occupation.

2) The western occupation of Iraq.
    Not an occupation.
Sorry, replace 'western occupation of' with 'current western military presence and civil/political interference in'. Suffix it with ', following imposition of western norms of government'. Semantics are important.
Not semantics. Reality.

Reality is important, not what you want to portray it as. So your pedantry wouldn't be accurate, either.

Might as well say that Germany, Japan, England, and anywhere else that has troops other than those of the host nation on their soil are "occupied" by someone else, since the circumstances are essentially the same: troops are there under the auspices of agreements between two sovereign nations, following Status of Forces Agreements.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard