Avatar - Who's seen it?

2010-01-27 11:40:19

#301

liquidat0r: wtf.; +2,223|6889|UK

@Mek

I guess it depends on the cinema. Especially if you see it in 3D ... great picture quality in this case.

+ really good TVs/home theatre systems are expensive

@KCD, well OK ... but I would still wait

(wait for 720p/1080p x264 tbh)

<-- pedant/perfectionist

2010-01-27 11:40:46

#302

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|7001|Toronto | Canada

King_County_Downy wrote:
It's 480p DIVX, looks pretty good on my pc here at work. I'm going to hook up the 'ol projector tonight when I get home.

fail resolution + fail codec? yikes.

Mekstizzle wrote:
I don't know about Cinema being better than Blu Ray. The picture quality in cinema's doesn't seem that great. It's good, but not like when you watch a really good blu-ray film on a really good TV. What Cinema has going for it is size and sound, but not picture quality. Not even Imax. I've never felt amazed by picture quality/sharpness on the large screen. They need to up the resolution by multiple factors because it doesn't cut out for a big huge screen.

You really havent been to a great theatre then. IMAX films looks incredible, far better than any other screen I've ever seen. Youre probably sitting far too close.

2010-01-27 11:41:28

#303

King_County_Downy: shitfaced; +2,791|6859|Seattle

Mekstizzle wrote:
I never got the chance to watch this in Cinema on 3D or anything. The best I'll do is just wait for a good quality HD rip to come out I guess.

Hmmm I wonder how long I could get away with puting this movie up on our FTP server without getting caught.... Probably not a good idea.

Anyone know how to email a file 1.5Gigs?

Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it

2010-01-27 11:41:54

#304

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6883|London, England

I went to watch IMAX (Transformers 2) here, it was good, but maybe I was expecting more than that. Especially for the price

2010-01-27 11:42:51

#305

DonFck: Hibernator; +3,227|6893|Finland

The tracking with 3D-glasses sucks ass tbh.

I need around tree fiddy.

2010-01-27 11:43:32

#306

liquidat0r: wtf.; +2,223|6889|UK

King_County_Downy wrote:
Anyone know how to email a file 1.5Gigs?

Use an FTP server ... oh wait

Also, if I think you have what I'm looking at at the moment then you should check the sound quality. It could well be very fucking lame.

DonFck wrote:
The tracking with 3D-glasses sucks ass tbh.

hmm?

2010-01-27 11:44:15

#307

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|7001|Toronto | Canada

Mekstizzle wrote:
I went to watch IMAX (Transformers 2) here, it was good, but maybe I was expecting more than that. Especially for the price

You realize Transformers 2 had about 10 mins total of IMAX right?

2010-01-27 11:45:11

#308

bugz: Fission Mailed; +3,311|6574

Winston_Churchill wrote:
King_County_Downy wrote:
I'm a cheapass mofo Imax 3D is like $35/ea

Not really interested in paying $70 to see a frickin movie.
Woah... its $15 for IMAX here.

And Free doesnt > all in this case since you are getting a better experience from seeing it in theatres. I've seen it 3 times... so $45 and it was totally worth it

$13.50 here

Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/ebug122

2010-01-27 11:46:38

#309

DonFck: Hibernator; +3,227|6893|Finland

liquidat0r wrote:
DonFck wrote:
The tracking with 3D-glasses sucks ass tbh.
hmm?

I at least always experience lag and blur in fast motion with 3D. Could very well be the same with a normal cinema showing, but I associate it with 3D.

Oh, and I paid 0€ for my tickets for me & her. It wouldve been 25.00 tot. but I luckily had frrebies.

I need around tree fiddy.

2010-01-27 11:48:27

#310

liquidat0r: wtf.; +2,223|6889|UK

DonFck wrote:
liquidat0r wrote:
DonFck wrote:
The tracking with 3D-glasses sucks ass tbh.
hmm?
I at least always experience lag and blur in fast motion with 3D. Could very well be the same with a normal cinema showing, but I associate it with 3D.

Hmm, I didn't notice that at all in Avatar.

2010-01-27 11:49:45

#311

DonFck: Hibernator; +3,227|6893|Finland

liquidat0r wrote:
DonFck wrote:
liquidat0r wrote:

hmm?
I at least always experience lag and blur in fast motion with 3D. Could very well be the same with a normal cinema showing, but I associate it with 3D.
Hmm, I didn't notice that at all in Avatar.

I even took the glasses off at some point and looked at the stereo picture for a few seconds, since the blur had less blur.

I need around tree fiddy.

2010-01-27 12:06:55

#312

M.O.A.B: 'Light 'em up!'; +1,220|6485|Escea

Only thing I noticed was a little loss of focus on the edges, but I attribute that more to me wearing the 3D glasses over my actual glasses and being a few millimetres further away from my eyes.

BF2S Forums Avatar - Who's seen it?

King_County_Downy wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

King_County_Downy wrote:

DonFck wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

King_County_Downy wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

DonFck wrote:

DonFck wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

DonFck wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

DonFck wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

Board footer