BF2S Forums Your top 10 games of the decade (2000-2009)

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

androoz wrote:

1. MW2
2. CoD4
3. CS:S
4. Halo 3
5. BF2
6. CoD2

Played a lot of other games but these are the only worthy ones of being listed.

I still can't figure out why people list CoD6 above CoD4.

And CoD4 wasn't even that great either.

Maybe they rank it higher becuase of the "improved" MP?

androoz wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

I still can't figure out why people list CoD6 above CoD4.

And CoD4 wasn't even that great either.

Obviously people are gonna hate it but you guys just can't adapt. CoD MW2 had some of the biggest sales ever along with CoD4 and they're good games.

To play Miggle´s Advocat here:

High number of sales != good quality

Miggle wrote:

Sisco10 wrote:

androoz wrote:

Obviously people are gonna hate it but you guys just can't adapt. CoD MW2 had some of the biggest sales ever along with CoD4 and they're good games.

To play Miggle´s Advocat here:

High number of sales != good quality

<3

Credit where it´s due

specialistx2324 wrote:

androoz wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

And CoD4 wasn't even that great either.

Obviously people are gonna hate it but you guys just can't adapt. CoD MW2 had some of the biggest sales ever along with CoD4 and they're good games.

they improved a lot of things in the game for the most part. so i dont expected any thing less than total sales domination.

Doc: No, it wasn't really as spectacular as Battlefield, but still an enjoyable game and a damn sight better technologically than CoD6.

androoz: It isn't a matter of adapting. It's a matter of seeing them hack off bits and pieces of CoD4 and replace them with a riot shield. For example, the only reason CoD6 servers can run halfway stably is because they nerfed max players. Other than that, it plays just like CoD4 so I don't see how you and the militant host of CoD6 fans with stars in their eyes can tell us off. We wanted to love MW2, we really do, but it just felt like a huge betrayal. They slashed the quality and bumped up the price. Me, I only think of it as an 'ok' game.

Adapt my ass.

Miggle wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

specialistx2324 wrote:

they improved a lot of things in the game for the most part. so i dont expected any thing less than total sales domination.

Doc: No, it wasn't really as spectacular as Battlefield, but still an enjoyable game and a damn sight better technologically than CoD6.

androoz: It isn't a matter of adapting. It's a matter of seeing them hack off bits and pieces of CoD4 and replace them with a riot shield. For example, the only reason CoD6 servers can run halfway stably is because they nerfed max players. Other than that, it plays just like CoD4 so I don't see how you and the militant host of CoD6 fans with stars in their eyes can tell us off. We wanted to love MW2, we really do, but it just felt like a huge betrayal. They slashed the quality and bumped up the price. Me, I only think of it as an 'ok' game.

Adapt my ass.

they've been hacking off pieces of cod since 1.

Actually they haven't. The games have been dramatically improving since CoD1. That's why the recent CoD's have been on consoles, etc, while the older ones were only for the computer.

Sisco10 wrote:

androoz wrote:

Actually they haven't. The games have been dramatically improving since CoD1. That's why the recent CoD's have been on consoles, etc, while the older ones were only for the computer.

Miggle wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Sisco10 wrote:

androoz wrote:

k, just post retarded smileys since you know what i said was pretty accurate.

androoz wrote:

Miggle wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Doc: No, it wasn't really as spectacular as Battlefield, but still an enjoyable game and a damn sight better technologically than CoD6.

androoz: It isn't a matter of adapting. It's a matter of seeing them hack off bits and pieces of CoD4 and replace them with a riot shield. For example, the only reason CoD6 servers can run halfway stably is because they nerfed max players. Other than that, it plays just like CoD4 so I don't see how you and the militant host of CoD6 fans with stars in their eyes can tell us off. We wanted to love MW2, we really do, but it just felt like a huge betrayal. They slashed the quality and bumped up the price. Me, I only think of it as an 'ok' game.

Adapt my ass.

they've been hacking off pieces of cod since 1.

Actually they haven't. The games have been dramatically improving since CoD1. That's why the recent CoD's have been on consoles, etc, while the older ones were only for the computer.

androoz wrote:

k, just post retarded smileys since you know what i said was pretty accurate.

androoz wrote:

seriously?...

Miggle wrote:

androoz wrote:

k, just post retarded smileys since you know what i said was pretty accurate.

androoz wrote:

seriously?...

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Miggle wrote:

androoz wrote:

k, just post retarded smileys since you know what i said was pretty accurate.

androoz wrote:

seriously?...

1.6>s

androoz wrote:

Flecco wrote:

androoz wrote:

ok, cool. you quoted me? yeah?

Okay, explain to me how games coming out on multiple systems makes them an improvement? That's fucking retarded logic.


Removing dedicated server support was pretty much them shitting on PC gamers faces. The only reason CoD4 got funding was because PC players purchased 1 and 2 in droves, because they were rather good titles. CoD4, less good but still pretty decent. MW2 = crappy net code and very poor MP level design for the most part.

Okay well it has gotten rid of hackers mostly and has made the game more balanced with no dedicated servers. I think it's good that PC games are becoming more like console games.

I think you're an idiot then.

lol balanced because of no dedicated servers... ahahhahah what a laugh.