Pages: 1 2 3 4

 

Poll

Should illegally obtained evidence be allowed in court?

Yes27%27% - 19
No72%72% - 51
Total: 70
2010-01-09 15:33:24
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6392|eXtreme to the maX

Harmor wrote:

Well looky here:

Judge tosses out most evidence on Gitmo detainee

(via. http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/)

When you try terrorists who are enemy combatants in civilian count this is what happens...

/facepalm
If the Blackwater guys had been sent to Gitmo and tortured and tried there you wouldn't have a problem with double standards now would you?
Fuck Israel
2010-01-09 20:26:15
RAIMIUS
You with the face!
+244|7001|US
No, allowing illegally obtained evidence only invites law enforcement to use MORE illegal methods.

Sadly, not permitting illegal evidence will let some criminals go free, but the alternative is likely worse (infringing on a LOT of people's rights.)

In the OP's situation, the wiretap would not be admissible.  It can not be used.
(One of the people "in the know" should call in an anonymous tip from a phone booth!)
2010-01-09 20:56:13
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6824|Long Island, New York
Nobody is above the law.

No.

 

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard