Only in America
Nah man. It was the teachings of ISLAM that made him kill those people. Muhammed killed people, therefore any Muslim is a KILLER. He didn't get dumped by his girlfriend and go on a rampage or something, he did it as an attack on AMERICA. It even says in the Qur'an "Strike down the infidel, wherever they may be, especially in the supermarket!"lowing wrote:
It is ok I am sure he is just one of the "few". he probably did it bcause the US is in Iraq and Afghanistan, or maybe because we are allied with Israel.krazed wrote:
give it time lolruisleipa wrote:
Oh ffs are you serious
It is the fault of US forign policy I am sure, ask any apologist in here, they will tell ya all about it.
Honestly, Iowing, you are a real prick man, I've tried to understand your posts and points of view, but to be honest, posting stupid insentitive shit like this and making it all into a 'muslim' thing is just childish and idiotic. Seriously man, please take a look at your life and try to understand where your hatred for other people comes from, becaus Islam has FUCK ALL to do with this case, yet you try to turn it into some stupid anti-islam rant.lowing wrote:
It is ok I am sure he is just one of the "few". he probably did it bcause the US is in Iraq and Afghanistan, or maybe because we are allied with Israel.krazed wrote:
give it time lolruisleipa wrote:
Oh ffs are you serious
It is the fault of US forign policy I am sure, ask any apologist in here, they will tell ya all about it.
His name, his 'religion' (if he even HAD ONE), so what? He could be a fuckin buddhist priest and still be a fuckin nutter and it wouldn't make any difference. Grow up, child.
Surprised this hasn't happened her in the States yet.
Finland, I thought that was part of Seaworld.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-12-31 21:07:30)
Fuck Israel
finland, moar liek winland. amirite?
I highly doubt this is the work of a budhist priest.ruisleipa wrote:
Honestly, Iowing, you are a real prick man, I've tried to understand your posts and points of view, but to be honest, posting stupid insentitive shit like this and making it all into a 'muslim' thing is just childish and idiotic. Seriously man, please take a look at your life and try to understand where your hatred for other people comes from, becaus Islam has FUCK ALL to do with this case, yet you try to turn it into some stupid anti-islam rant.lowing wrote:
It is ok I am sure he is just one of the "few". he probably did it bcause the US is in Iraq and Afghanistan, or maybe because we are allied with Israel.krazed wrote:
give it time lol
It is the fault of US forign policy I am sure, ask any apologist in here, they will tell ya all about it.
His name, his 'religion' (if he even HAD ONE), so what? He could be a fuckin buddhist priest and still be a fuckin nutter and it wouldn't make any difference. Grow up, child.
Yeah, Pos, it should be "only in America and/or Finland". Now, I'll leave you with one word. Guns.
Now, I wait for it to sink in, and then I inb4americans.
No shit sherlock.Jenspm wrote:
I highly doubt this is the work of a budhist priest.
Happy New Year, Finland.
How about he was a crazy nutter who just had access to guns. I'm sure you can do the same amount of damage with a knife in a loaded mall.Jenspm wrote:
Yeah, Pos, it should be "only in America and/or Finland". Now, I'll leave you with one word. Guns.
I didn't say anything about any Muslim being a killer. Not once in my history in this forum. It is however the same line of bullshit you all tried to pass off with the Ft. Hood terrorist. "He isn't a terrrorist, he is just another nutter". No actually, he was a fuckin' terrorist.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Nah man. It was the teachings of ISLAM that made him kill those people. Muhammed killed people, therefore any Muslim is a KILLER. He didn't get dumped by his girlfriend and go on a rampage or something, he did it as an attack on AMERICA. It even says in the Qur'an "Strike down the infidel, wherever they may be, especially in the supermarket!"lowing wrote:
It is ok I am sure he is just one of the "few". he probably did it bcause the US is in Iraq and Afghanistan, or maybe because we are allied with Israel.krazed wrote:
give it time lol
It is the fault of US forign policy I am sure, ask any apologist in here, they will tell ya all about it.
As for my post, I was being a smart ass, poking holes in your endless excuses for Islam and all that is done in its name. Ft Hood was a perfect example.
You mean you have tried to understand my opinions on exercising personal responsibility, the difference between a religion and an individual, actually punishing criminals, etc. and you just don't get it? Ask questions I will answer, even in PM if you wish.ruisleipa wrote:
Honestly, Iowing, you are a real prick man, I've tried to understand your posts and points of view, but to be honest, posting stupid insensitive shit like this and making it all into a 'muslim' thing is just childish and idiotic. Seriously man, please take a look at your life and try to understand where your hatred for other people comes from, because Islam has FUCK ALL to do with this case, yet you try to turn it into some stupid anti-islam rant.lowing wrote:
It is ok I am sure he is just one of the "few". he probably did it because the US is in Iraq and Afghanistan, or maybe because we are allied with Israel.krazed wrote:
give it time lol
It is the fault of US foreign policy I am sure, ask any apologist in here, they will tell ya all about it.
His name, his 'religion' (if he even HAD ONE), so what? He could be a fuckin buddhist priest and still be a fuckin nutter and it wouldn't make any difference. Grow up, child.
By the way, if you want insensitivity ask me how I feel about the FACT that Muhammad was a murdering child molester.
dammit lowing this has fuck all to do with religion but you juist have to drag your sorry ass in to thie thread and drag up a load of shit. Go take your bullshit hatemongering elsewhere. I couldn't give a flying rats ass how you feel about whatever 'facts' you're currently using to ramp up your anger at Islam.
Yeah I know, I heard the same shit after Ft. Hood, Islamic apologists scrambling everywhere to try and find a way to manuver the story in such a way that it had nothing to do with Islam, and was not an Islamic terror attack. They failed.ruisleipa wrote:
dammit lowing this has fuck all to do with religion but you juist have to drag your sorry ass in to thie thread and drag up a load of shit. Go take your bullshit hatemongering elsewhere. I couldn't give a flying rats ass how you feel about whatever 'facts' you're currently using to ramp up your anger at Islam.
Betcha there is an Islamic law that allows the killing of her. Shall we look it up?
http://www.islam-watch.org/SyedKamranMi … illing.htm
might be something in here.
but guns kill and eat small children if they're left unattended, didn't you know?Cybargs wrote:
How about he was a crazy nutter who just had access to guns. I'm sure you can do the same amount of damage with a knife in a loaded mall.Jenspm wrote:
Yeah, Pos, it should be "only in America and/or Finland". Now, I'll leave you with one word. Guns.
replace finland by the us and fins by christian americansMekstizzle wrote:
Although all the other deadly shootings in the past few years in that country, were carried out by Fins
religion of peace
ban malls
ban guns, trust everyone ...
lowing I saw what you were trying to do... It was just completely irrelevant to this topic.lowing wrote:
I didn't say anything about any Muslim being a killer. Not once in my history in this forum. It is however the same line of bullshit you all tried to pass off with the Ft. Hood terrorist. "He isn't a terrrorist, he is just another nutter". No actually, he was a fuckin' terrorist.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Nah man. It was the teachings of ISLAM that made him kill those people. Muhammed killed people, therefore any Muslim is a KILLER. He didn't get dumped by his girlfriend and go on a rampage or something, he did it as an attack on AMERICA. It even says in the Qur'an "Strike down the infidel, wherever they may be, especially in the supermarket!"lowing wrote:
It is ok I am sure he is just one of the "few". he probably did it bcause the US is in Iraq and Afghanistan, or maybe because we are allied with Israel.
It is the fault of US forign policy I am sure, ask any apologist in here, they will tell ya all about it.
As for my post, I was being a smart ass, poking holes in your endless excuses for Islam and all that is done in its name. Ft Hood was a perfect example.
Oh, so the ft hood guy was completely mentally stable, thats good to know.
This is possibly the worst single thread in DST for about 10 pages, well done on that.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6979
Let me say that Lowing did not bring up the "Islam Issue" in this thread. Trolls were scratching at the idea and calling Lowing's name.lowing wrote:
Yeah I know, I heard the same shit after Ft. Hood, Islamic apologists scrambling everywhere to try and find a way to manuver the story in such a way that it had nothing to do with Islam, and was not an Islamic terror attack. They failed.ruisleipa wrote:
dammit lowing this has fuck all to do with religion but you juist have to drag your sorry ass in to thie thread and drag up a load of shit. Go take your bullshit hatemongering elsewhere. I couldn't give a flying rats ass how you feel about whatever 'facts' you're currently using to ramp up your anger at Islam.
Betcha there is an Islamic law that allows the killing of her. Shall we look it up?
http://www.islam-watch.org/SyedKamranMi … illing.htm
might be something in here.
Really. It has dissolved into a ban Fin(ray)land and a Fort Hood thread.Spark wrote:
This is possibly the worst single thread in DST for about 10 pages, well done on that.
Last edited by Superior Mind (2010-01-01 21:42:28)
and as sure as the sun rises in the East, he took the bait. Whereas, if he even BOTHERED to read about it he'd realise it has f-all to do with this case. Clearly, he couldn't be bothered.Superior Mind wrote:
Let me say that Lowing did not bring up the "Islam Issue" in this thread. Trolls were scratching at the idea and calling Lowing's name.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8437256.stm
Already explained the relevancy, and yes, the Ft. Hood terrorist was in complete control of his faculties, and knew what he wanted to do, and did it.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
lowing I saw what you were trying to do... It was just completely irrelevant to this topic.lowing wrote:
I didn't say anything about any Muslim being a killer. Not once in my history in this forum. It is however the same line of bullshit you all tried to pass off with the Ft. Hood terrorist. "He isn't a terrrorist, he is just another nutter". No actually, he was a fuckin' terrorist.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Nah man. It was the teachings of ISLAM that made him kill those people. Muhammed killed people, therefore any Muslim is a KILLER. He didn't get dumped by his girlfriend and go on a rampage or something, he did it as an attack on AMERICA. It even says in the Qur'an "Strike down the infidel, wherever they may be, especially in the supermarket!"
As for my post, I was being a smart ass, poking holes in your endless excuses for Islam and all that is done in its name. Ft Hood was a perfect example.
Oh, so the ft hood guy was completely mentally stable, thats good to know.
No actually, I did read it, but as I said, I am sure there is some Islamic law that covers him. That is my point.ruisleipa wrote:
and as sure as the sun rises in the East, he took the bait. Whereas, if he even BOTHERED to read about it he'd realise it has f-all to do with this case. Clearly, he couldn't be bothered.Superior Mind wrote:
Let me say that Lowing did not bring up the "Islam Issue" in this thread. Trolls were scratching at the idea and calling Lowing's name.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8437256.stm
By the way, I don't take bait, I read and I post what interests me,
Last edited by lowing (2010-01-02 06:53:05)
Let it go dude, this thread is shitted up enough already as it is.lowing wrote:
No actually, I did read it, but as I said, I am sure there is some Islamic law that covers him. That is my point.ruisleipa wrote:
and as sure as the sun rises in the East, he took the bait. Whereas, if he even BOTHERED to read about it he'd realise it has f-all to do with this case. Clearly, he couldn't be bothered.Superior Mind wrote:
Let me say that Lowing did not bring up the "Islam Issue" in this thread. Trolls were scratching at the idea and calling Lowing's name.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8437256.stm
By the way, I don't take bait, I read and I post what interests me,
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman