Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5645|London, England
https://www.foxnews.com/static/managed/img/Politics/wantedposter_monster_397x224.jpg
Chamber of Commerce CEO Tom Donohue is a wanted man -- at least according to the liberal activist group that's put a de facto bounty on his head.

A network of liberal groups known as Velvet Revolution started an ad campaign offering $200,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the man whose trade organization has become a thorn in the side of the Obama administration and congressional Democrats.

The group is not leveling any specific charges of criminal behavior. Rather, it is casting a wide net, fishing for any whistleblowers from Donohue's past who might come forward with allegations of wrongdoing. The campaign against the Chamber was launched in response to the group's opposition to climate change legislation and health care reform, and its plan to spend $100 million lobbying against these and other initiatives.

"On every issue, the Chamber is kind of the lead corporate advocate for the status quo," said Kevin Zeese, a lawyer who sits on the board for Velvet Revolution, calling Donohue a "knee-jerk reactionary" and the Chamber a "right-wing extremist group."

The Chamber of Commerce, meanwhile, decried the ad campaign and threatened possible legal action.

"The media should be following the money trail behind this scurrilous group instead of giving credence to its outrageous tactics -- and we are considering legal options with the ad," spokesman Eric Wohlschlegel said.

The Chamber has already taken a lot of heat from the White House. Top aides tried to neutralize the group earlier in the year by doing an end-run around the organization and dealing directly with members, as some big companies, like Apple, peeled off from the Chamber due to disagreements over issues like climate change.

The organization was also not invited to Obama's jobs forum in Washington last week.

But Zeese said the White House has nothing to do with the bounty on Donohue.

"It's individual donors. We have no connection to the White House or unions or anything like that," he said.

Velvet Revolution launched the StoptheChamber campaign in October and started offering a bounty for information on Donohue a month later. A $100,000 reward was increased to $200,000 early this month, thanks to what Zeese called a "handful of larger donors" whom he would not identify.

A full-page print ad that looks like a "wanted" poster out of the wild West began to run in the Washington City Paper this week. It features a head shot of Donohue and offers a tip line for "insiders and whistleblowers possessing information not already in the public domain."

The tip line is live. When FoxNews.com called, the operator asked for "criminal" information about Donohue.

Zeese said that a handful of tips have come in which the group is "pursuing."

He said the hope is to forward any damaging information onto the Justice Department or Congress for further investigation.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12 … mber-boss/

I mean just wow. Can't beat them so they have to silence and intimidate them? This is the most disgusting thing I've ever seen perpetrated by people who call themselves open minded.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6392|eXtreme to the maX
The word 'liberal' is totally misused in the US, why not just say Democrats?

Still, anyone who disagreed with the War of Terror was a terrorist, so it swings both ways.
Fuck Israel
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5645|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

The word 'liberal' is totally misused in the US, why not just say Democrats?

Still, anyone who disagreed with the War of Terror was a terrorist, so it swings both ways.
Sources?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6755
I like how you imply that all liberals condone this.

This is just 1 left-wing nut group, I mean come on "Velvet Revolution?" They're either wanna be Bolsheviks or Slovakian Sepratists, hardly a group appealing to the mainstream.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5645|London, England

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

I like how you imply that all liberals condone this.

This is just 1 left-wing nut group, I mean come on "Velvet Revolution?" They're either wanna be Bolsheviks or Slovakian Sepratists, hardly a group appealing to the mainstream.
Mainstream enough to attract $200,000 in donations
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6439|what

JohnG@lt wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

I like how you imply that all liberals condone this.

This is just 1 left-wing nut group, I mean come on "Velvet Revolution?" They're either wanna be Bolsheviks or Slovakian Sepratists, hardly a group appealing to the mainstream.
Mainstream enough to attract $200,000 in donations
You have no concept of how much money that is in terms of donations.

$200,000 is not much at all.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6755

JohnG@lt wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

I like how you imply that all liberals condone this.

This is just 1 left-wing nut group, I mean come on "Velvet Revolution?" They're either wanna be Bolsheviks or Slovakian Sepratists, hardly a group appealing to the mainstream.
Mainstream enough to attract $200,000 in donations
Who says that they actually have $200,000?

They don't expect anyone to actually arrest this guy, they just want media attention so that people think he's a bad guy, which will enable them to do whatever those silly wannaba Bolsheviks do.
13/f/taiwan
Member
+940|5985

JohnG@lt wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

I like how you imply that all liberals condone this.

This is just 1 left-wing nut group, I mean come on "Velvet Revolution?" They're either wanna be Bolsheviks or Slovakian Sepratists, hardly a group appealing to the mainstream.
Mainstream enough to attract $200,000 in donations
2,000 people donate $100. That is not much.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5645|London, England

13/f/taiwan wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

I like how you imply that all liberals condone this.

This is just 1 left-wing nut group, I mean come on "Velvet Revolution?" They're either wanna be Bolsheviks or Slovakian Sepratists, hardly a group appealing to the mainstream.
Mainstream enough to attract $200,000 in donations
2,000 people donate $100. That is not much.
I'm in the wrong business. I should be a professional protester instead.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5988|College Park, MD
I think I saw him run a red light once. I'll take my 200 grand.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6392|eXtreme to the maX

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

The word 'liberal' is totally misused in the US, why not just say Democrats?

Still, anyone who disagreed with the War of Terror was a terrorist, so it swings both ways.
Sources?
Fuck Israel
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5645|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

The word 'liberal' is totally misused in the US, why not just say Democrats?

Still, anyone who disagreed with the War of Terror was a terrorist, so it swings both ways.
Sources?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-23kmhc3P8U
He said if you don't believe in freedom you're with the terrorists. Are you saying you do not believe in freedom?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7008|Sydney, Australia

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


Sources?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-23kmhc3P8U
He said if you don't believe in freedom you're with the terrorists. Are you saying you do not believe in freedom?
Jesus christ. It was a phrase. An expression. How do you not get that?

Back to the OP now?
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5645|London, England

mcminty wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

He said if you don't believe in freedom you're with the terrorists. Are you saying you do not believe in freedom?
Jesus christ. It was a phrase. An expression. How do you not get that?

Back to the OP now?
I do get it. Completely. Dilbert is just being himself so I felt like poking him
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7008|Sydney, Australia

JohnG@lt wrote:

mcminty wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


He said if you don't believe in freedom you're with the terrorists. Are you saying you do not believe in freedom?
Jesus christ. It was a phrase. An expression. How do you not get that?

Back to the OP now?
I do get it. Completely. Dilbert is just being himself so I felt like poking him
*sigh*

Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6392|eXtreme to the maX

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


Sources?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-23kmhc3P8U
He said if you don't believe in freedom you're with the terrorists. Are you saying you do not believe in freedom?
Depends if you mean the Bush definition of 'freedom' or not, 'freedom' meant the freedom to invade Iraq because the US had been attacked by Saudis living in Afghanistan.

Anyway, it was just a throwaway line, to corral people into the lynch mob, it had nothing to do with freedom per se.
Fuck Israel
RAIMIUS
You with the face!
+244|7001|US
Dilbert, there is a difference between being critical and being rabid.  You seem like you really want to cross that line.  Try to stick somewhat close to the topics being discussed, please.

To the OP:
That is a dirty tactic. 
...Velvet Revolution?  Who the heck are they?
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6392|eXtreme to the maX
Bah, just pointing out both sides are guilty of totalitarian dissent-crushing.
Fuck Israel
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6938|USA

Dilbert_X wrote:

Bah, just pointing out both sides are guilty of totalitarian dissent-crushing.
Except, liberalism and the accusations of it, is real. Their strife regarding the war on terror, did show a weak America and did strengthen the resolve of our enemy. The liberals did play politics with the lives of our servicemen. Undeniable.

I give you Afghanistan, during the election, the liberals made it an issue that we are not to be in Iraq, the "real fight" is in Afghanistan, well now that we have committed 30,000 more troops there, they are going against their own Messiah about the war. Again projecting weakness ot our enemies.

This is different than protesting taxing the fuck out of the American people to subsidize the lazy.
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6982|NJ
I would rather appear weak to our enemy's then weaken our self chasing down false enemies?

Hey isn't that what they did to the Russians, have them bankrupt there economy fighting an unwinable war?

But anyway they both do the same shit. It's like the Clinton BJ scandal, every politicians is crooked that's why they're in that business.
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6435|'straya
I didn't realise that a group named after a Communist revolution represented the feelings/idea of all American "liberals"
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6392|eXtreme to the maX
I would rather appear weak to our enemy's then weaken our self chasing down false enemies?
Exactly, the Republicans weakened America more by launching two unwinnable wars and collapsing the economy than they would have if they'd ignored and marginalised AQ and trained airport security in using metal detectors.
Fuck Israel
Narupug
Fodder Mostly
+150|5883|Vacationland

lowing wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Bah, just pointing out both sides are guilty of totalitarian dissent-crushing.
Except, liberalism and the accusations of it, is real. Their strife regarding the war on terror, did show a weak America and did strengthen the resolve of our enemy. The liberals did play politics with the lives of our servicemen. Undeniable.

I give you Afghanistan, during the election, the liberals made it an issue that we are not to be in Iraq, the "real fight" is in Afghanistan, well now that we have committed 30,000 more troops there, they are going against their own Messiah about the war. Again projecting weakness ot our enemies.

This is different than protesting taxing the fuck out of the American people to subsidize the lazy.
And the conservatives aren't playing politics with the lives of the citizens of this country over health care reform?  The people who die and are bankrupted from that are so much less important then our servicemen
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6938|USA

cpt.fass1 wrote:

I would rather appear weak to our enemy's then weaken our self chasing down false enemies?

Hey isn't that what they did to the Russians, have them bankrupt there economy fighting an unwinable war?

But anyway they both do the same shit. It's like the Clinton BJ scandal, every politicians is crooked that's why they're in that business.
False enemies? Might wanna take a side step through recent history there capt. Attacks on western civilization is hardly imagined, and our enemies non-existent.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6938|USA

Dilbert_X wrote:

I would rather appear weak to our enemy's then weaken our self chasing down false enemies?
Exactly, the Republicans weakened America more by launching two unwinnable wars and collapsing the economy than they would have if they'd ignored and marginalised AQ and trained airport security in using metal detectors.
Nope, like Vietnam, the weak minded liberal ideology forced this war to rendered "unwinnable". Went sent them, yeah this includes the democrat congress, and then the democrats hung them out ot dry.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard