Dunno. I went ahead and got myself CF because I know GT300 will be blazing fast, but looking to be slower than HD 5870 CF. And needed something now.Lucien wrote:
Does anyone have an idea when we can expect to hear more specs or even benchmarks?
Last edited by Bell (2009-10-07 09:17:23)
Everything I've read by that guy has just been slamming NVIDIA, so I'd take that article with a grain heap of salt.Scratch[USA] wrote:
ran across this bit of info, on another site,on the GT300. Thought I would share.
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/11/25/ … amed-g210/
"NVIDIA IS RENAMING parts once again. Now the 200 series is the 300 series, just like we told you months ago. Nvidia has no new parts and no chance of coming up with any soon, so all it can do is unethically try to snow consumers."
999 / 1000 time he is. Don't make me quote his articles, pages run out from this topic if I do.Bell wrote:
Thing is though, Charile isnt lying.
How the fuck is Nvidia scamming people if the card is the same damn price?Scratch[USA] wrote:
ran across this bit of info, on another site,on the GT300. Thought I would share.
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/11/25/ … amed-g210/
"NVIDIA IS RENAMING parts once again. Now the 200 series is the 300 series, just like we told you months ago. Nvidia has no new parts and no chance of coming up with any soon, so all it can do is unethically try to snow consumers."
I won't believe it until I see a reputable source.Scratch[USA] wrote:
ran across this bit of info, on another site,on the GT300. Thought I would share.
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/11/25/ … amed-g210/
"NVIDIA IS RENAMING parts once again. Now the 200 series is the 300 series, just like we told you months ago. Nvidia has no new parts and no chance of coming up with any soon, so all it can do is unethically try to snow consumers."
If it's the same price and same performance why would they change the name other than to succer less informed consumers into thinking there buying into 300 series tech? That's all this buisiness practise ever was, ATi have done it in the past aswell. It's to shift stock.The_Sniper_NM wrote:
How the fuck is Nvidia scamming people if the card is the same damn price?Scratch[USA] wrote:
ran across this bit of info, on another site,on the GT300. Thought I would share.
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/11/25/ … amed-g210/
"NVIDIA IS RENAMING parts once again. Now the 200 series is the 300 series, just like we told you months ago. Nvidia has no new parts and no chance of coming up with any soon, so all it can do is unethically try to snow consumers."
Last time I fucking checked, the 9800GTX+ is the same price as the GTS 250.
Fucking morons...
That isn't "scamming." There is no reason, especially in this economy, for Nvidia to throw R&D money at developing a version of G200 that has 120 stream procs when they had G92.Bell wrote:
If it's the same price and same performance why would they change the name other than to succer less informed consumers into thinking there buying into 300 series tech? That's all this buisiness practise ever was, ATi have done it in the past aswell. It's to shift stock.The_Sniper_NM wrote:
How the fuck is Nvidia scamming people if the card is the same damn price?Scratch[USA] wrote:
ran across this bit of info, on another site,on the GT300. Thought I would share.
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/11/25/ … amed-g210/
"NVIDIA IS RENAMING parts once again. Now the 200 series is the 300 series, just like we told you months ago. Nvidia has no new parts and no chance of coming up with any soon, so all it can do is unethically try to snow consumers."
Last time I fucking checked, the 9800GTX+ is the same price as the GTS 250.
Fucking morons...
So why do anything? They have a card, that has it's place in the market. What reason other than trying to fuck customers is there to rebrand a card, if, ''especially in this ecnomy'' money is tight, why go to the trouble exactly?The_Sniper_NM wrote:
There is no reason, especially in this economy, for Nvidia to throw R&D money at developing a version of G200 that has 120 stream procs when they had G92.
Last edited by Bell (2009-12-02 13:33:23)
Needs anuther edit 4 grammerz.Bell wrote:
So why do anything? They have a card, that has it's place in the market. What reason other than trying to fuck customers is there to rebrand a card, if, ''especially in this ecnomy'' money is tight, why go to the trouble exactly?The_Sniper_NM wrote:
There is no reason, especially in this economy, for Nvidia to throw R&D money at developing a version of G200 that has 120 stream procs when they had G92.
Knowone is really disputing there motives in selling the card (though I would of thought you would try and take the market forward in all price ranges, it isnt 2007 anymore). They can sell G92s for as long as there are buyers, and good luck to them. This rebranding though is only ever about suckering people into thinking it's a new product.
Nic wrote:
Looks good, price will probably be huge, I think I'm still gonna pick up a 5850, my 9800gt is ageing.
Low res WAT?!?!?!!?Scratch[USA] wrote:
Low res pic does not allow us to see the screen. Also dude has an apple t shirt on.
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2009-12-08 09:15:08)
lmao.Finray wrote:
lmao.
ie.
And they couldn't spare 30 seconds to install a web browser?The_Sniper_NM wrote:
lmao.Finray wrote:
lmao.
ie.
kinda obvious windows had just been installed.
If you're serious then...Finray wrote:
And they couldn't spare 30 seconds to install a web browser?The_Sniper_NM wrote:
lmao.Finray wrote:
lmao.
ie.
kinda obvious windows had just been installed.
You know, I always disagreed with everyone calling you an idiot.Finray wrote:
And they couldn't spare 30 seconds to install a web browser?The_Sniper_NM wrote:
lmao.Finray wrote:
lmao.
ie.
kinda obvious windows had just been installed.
Last edited by The_Sniper_NM (2009-12-09 14:52:24)
The_Sniper_NM wrote:
Edit: I've come to the conclusion that Nvidia must be a damn good company to work for. Look at the top right corner of the full res pic.
