Console, Leaning, Dedi, recording unlocked (almost)

2009-11-17 00:51:14

#1

aimless: Member; +166|6354|Texas

http://bashandslash.com/index.php?optio … Itemid=111

Haven't had the fortune of trying this game out but this makes it more appealing. Hopefully they can get a workaround that won't get anyone in too much trouble

Word tonight is that programmers around the net have managed to crack the "console" in MW2. They have looked inside the programming and they report that, though many of the dvars (features) we used to have in CoD4 are gone - some are still available.

There are programmers right now who are running MW2 locally and have modified the Multiplayer executable to enable their boxes to function as dedicated servers. Though at this moment, no one can connect to them - mainly due to the fact that no clients are running a "hacked" executable.

The good news here is that it, if they wanted to, Infinity Ward could simply "switch on" this functionality.

2009-11-17 00:57:50

#2

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6382|what

aimless wrote:
The good news here is that it, if they wanted to, Infinity Ward could simply "switch on" this functionality.

That isn't good news.

It's confirmation that IW are cunts.

2009-11-17 02:29:57

#3

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6903|Canberra, AUS

AussieReaper wrote:
aimless wrote:
The good news here is that it, if they wanted to, Infinity Ward could simply "switch on" this functionality.
That isn't good news.

It's confirmation that IW are cunts.

oh, you didn't know that already?

Whatever makes the game more fun is good news.

as I said in the other thread: this will increase the pressure on IW to release this functionality. Although I'd be surprised if they didn't see it coming, mind you a week is bloody fast.

Last edited by Spark (2009-11-17 02:31:35)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2009-11-17 02:53:03

#4

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6382|what

If they were aiming for functionality, you wouldn't be using IWnet.

2009-11-17 04:59:42

#5

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6850|London, England

Apparently the MP has already been hacked IWNet and all.

2009-11-17 05:08:43

#6

Sisco: grandmaster league revivalist; +493|6572

They forced it themselves. There "marketing strategy" only motivated the hardcore guys to torrent, hack and whatnot it, just to show IW what bullshit they were talking.

https://www.abload.de/img/bf3-bf2ssig0250wvn.jpg

2009-11-17 05:19:34

#7

Flecco: iPod is broken.; +1,048|6894|NT, like Mick Dundee

AussieReaper wrote:
If they were aiming for functionality, you wouldn't be using IWnet.

Have you used IWnet yet?

Other than that, I'd like them to bring the servers back, though not with the previous absolute shit browser.

Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.

2009-11-17 10:38:45

#8

DefCon-17: Maple Syrup Faggot; +362|6385|Vancouver | Canada

Flecco wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
If they were aiming for functionality, you wouldn't be using IWnet.
Have you used IWnet yet?

Rhetorical question, I assume.

The only people who strongly complain about IWnet are the ones who haven't tried it.

(That doesn't mean I don't want ded servers though..)

Last edited by DefCon-17 (2009-11-17 10:39:05)

2009-11-17 11:49:12

#9

wah1188: You orrible caaaaaaan't; +321|6689|UK

AussieReaper wrote:
IW ARE CUNTS BLAH BLAH BLAH

We get it you hate IW, shut the fuck up.

If you detest it so much quit talking about it.

2009-11-17 11:49:53

#10

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|6883

If you detest people's detestment so much, quit talking about it.

2009-11-17 12:41:47

#11

Ioan92: Member; +337|5951

mtb0minime wrote:
If you detest people's detestment so much, quit talking about it.

owned

2009-11-17 12:52:14

#12

wah1188: You orrible caaaaaaan't; +321|6689|UK

What its just a bit pathetic jumping on every mw2 thread and whining. Adding no constructive input whatsoever.

2009-11-17 12:55:03

#13

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6971|FUCK UBISOFT

wah1188 wrote:
What its just a bit pathetic jumping on every mw2 thread and whining. Adding no constructive input whatsoever.

same to everyone mindlessly saying they love it.

I will probably buy it once they get their shit sorted, multi is a lot better than MW1.

2009-11-17 14:15:38

#14

wah1188: You orrible caaaaaaan't; +321|6689|UK

Well of course it's subjective not every game is to everyones liking. It is a game that appeals to the masses if you think it's a bad idea I think you need to understand that most videogames are made with the incentive to create profit.

2009-11-17 14:41:03

#15

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6971|FUCK UBISOFT

wah1188 wrote:
Well of course it's subjective not every game is to everyones liking. It is a game that appeals to the masses if you think it's a bad idea I think you need to understand that most videogames are made with the incentive to create profit.

ah capitalism, making the best product rarely makes the most profit.

2009-11-18 01:08:54

#16

aerodynamic: FOCKING HELL; +241|5982|Roma

DefCon-17 wrote:
Flecco wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
If they were aiming for functionality, you wouldn't be using IWnet.
Have you used IWnet yet?
Rhetorical question, I assume.

The only people who strongly complain about IWnet are the ones who haven't tried it.

(That doesn't mean I don't want ded servers though..)

Well I remember IW saying they were ditching Dedi servers for IWnet match making to make the games more balanced, but honestly i've seen no change in balance yet.
In a normal TDM, I would see 3-4 people with lvl above 40 + some 20-30lvl people and the other team made of 1,5,10,2 lvls...thats not balancing at all. And plus the fact that you can't change teams during the match is bullshit, i don't mind but its not fair when some people leave and there are 2 10lvl guys left alone getting their asses raped. And i see this sooo many times, this balancing thing hasn't worked at all.
So what is the IWnet for then? the balancing doesn't work, it puts me in servers that are in America or in Asia so i lag like a bitch, it takes ages to find a match, it disconnects me from matches randomly....what the fuck is it for? Give me the dedicated servers back, so i can just choose a nice european lag less server and have a nice match.

https://bf3s.com/sigs/8ea27f2d75b353b0a18b096ed75ec5e142da7cc2.png

2009-11-18 02:31:42

#17

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6382|what

wah1188 wrote:
What its just a bit pathetic jumping on every mw2 thread and whining. Adding no constructive input whatsoever.

Haven't noticed you add anything at all tbh.

Did'ya see this?

2009-11-18 02:41:34

#18

baggs: Member; +732|6433

AussieReaper wrote:
wah1188 wrote:
What its just a bit pathetic jumping on every mw2 thread and whining. Adding no constructive input whatsoever.
Haven't noticed you add anything at all tbh.

Did'ya see this?

headshot.

2009-11-18 06:54:20

#19

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6699

Miggle wrote:
wah1188 wrote:
What its just a bit pathetic jumping on every mw2 thread and whining. Adding no constructive input whatsoever.
same to everyone mindlessly saying they love it.

I will probably buy it once they get their shit sorted, multi is a lot better than MW1.

how the fuck is it 'mindless' when we HAVE ACTUALLY PLAYED THE FUCKING GAME

"iwnet sucks blah blah blah" you say as you sit on bf2s 10 hours a day.
"well actually, no..." we say after using it, lag-free and easily for 10 hours of gameplay.

just shut the fuck up, it doesn't make you 'cool'

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2009-11-18 06:56:10

#20

Lucien: Fantasma Parastasie; +1,451|6882

Are we doing the whole "you can only be negative if you do so by means of constructive criticism" thing on BF2s now too?

2009-11-18 07:49:16

#21

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6699

isn't that a rule that pretty much applies to all life?

nobody likes a whiner

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2009-11-18 09:00:49

#22

NooBesT: Pizzahitler; +873|6698

No one likes a hypocrite either.

2009-11-18 09:27:04

#23

DefCon-17: Maple Syrup Faggot; +362|6385|Vancouver | Canada

aerodynamic wrote:
DefCon-17 wrote:
Flecco wrote:

Have you used IWnet yet?
Rhetorical question, I assume.

The only people who strongly complain about IWnet are the ones who haven't tried it.

(That doesn't mean I don't want ded servers though..)
Well I remember IW saying they were ditching Dedi servers for IWnet match making to make the games more balanced, but honestly i've seen no change in balance yet.
In a normal TDM, I would see 3-4 people with lvl above 40 + some 20-30lvl people and the other team made of 1,5,10,2 lvls...thats not balancing at all. And plus the fact that you can't change teams during the match is bullshit, i don't mind but its not fair when some people leave and there are 2 10lvl guys left alone getting their asses raped. And i see this sooo many times, this balancing thing hasn't worked at all.
So what is the IWnet for then? the balancing doesn't work, it puts me in servers that are in America or in Asia so i lag like a bitch, it takes ages to find a match, it disconnects me from matches randomly....what the fuck is it for? Give me the dedicated servers back, so i can just choose a nice european lag less server and have a nice match.

If you're getting rolled by clans full of 14 year olds who think colored names make them leet, play Mercenary DM. Random teams with no parties.

..and I've rarely gotten lag.

2009-11-18 09:33:32

#24

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6699

NooBesT wrote:
No one likes a hypocrite either.

aimed at me? all of my 'criticism' of games (of which the only and im sure the central example you're referring to being TF2) is constructive and based in experience. i hardly bitch and moan about team fortress 2 or new patch-updates without EVER FUCKING PLAYING the game, like half of the asstards here do. my criticism and (negative) comments about tf2's changes are all evaluative and analytical: comparing the 'then' to the 'now', questioning the utility of such changes and the intent/motive. it's a little more founded than just constantly pissing and moaning about, for example, IWNet, just because you've read a few piss-and-groan articles on digg.com. play the game without a chip on your shoulder and then honestly tell me that the matchmaking makes you rage, or 'ruins' your playing experience. 9 times out of 10, it wont.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2009-11-18 09:46:44

#25

Lucien: Fantasma Parastasie; +1,451|6882

Uzique wrote:
isn't that a rule that pretty much applies to all life?

nobody likes a whiner

Most of the time on the internet, people will try to outright ban others from simply being negative and insist that they always go out of their way to give their reasons, as that way it's easy to turn anything into endless argument and to never have to be proven wrong. There's a fine line between those who just want a reasonable discussion and those who can't stand to hear that someone might not appreciate something they like.

And as far as iwnet is concerned, I dislike it because the sole reason it was implemented was to force PC owners to have to buy DLC too.

BF2S Forums Console, Leaning, Dedi, recording unlocked (almost)

aimless wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

aimless wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Flecco wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

mtb0minime wrote:

wah1188 wrote:

wah1188 wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

Flecco wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

wah1188 wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

wah1188 wrote:

Miggle wrote:

wah1188 wrote:

aerodynamic wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

Flecco wrote:

NooBesT wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Board footer