S3v3N
lolwut?
+685|6805|Montucky

The Washington Times wrote:

The Senate this week told the Obama administration to stop spending stimulus bill wildland firefighting money on urban parks in the nation's capital - the first time either chamber has voted to reject one of the administration's stimulus spending decisions.  With fires raging out West, lawmakers said, it was ridiculous to spend firefighting money in Washington, which has no national forests and isn't considered a forest fire danger spot. In a voice vote Tuesday, senators voted unanimously to prohibit the U.S. Forest Service to spend any of its $500 million in wildland fire money in the city.
The Link



After this fire season, I can tell the Forest Service exactly what they can do with 500mil.
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5989|College Park, MD
Wait so what's the news? That money would be a waste in DC because our climate is never dry enough for wildfires. It'd be better spent in the West.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6816|Global Command
When I first heard the money was going to DC I was all " fookin' rrook whores. "


I thought of the fire fighters and those who have lost homes and I wished some would go die in the fire.
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6734|Chicago, IL
no wildfires in the northeast, +1 for the senate  (which brings them to about -174664 for the last few years)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard