Stubbee
Religions Hate Facts, Questions and Doubts
+223|7030|Reality
http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadi … JX5quAPVTA


Absolute bullshit. They gonna fine people for smoking in their home office too?
I think smoking is pretty vile but this is WAY OVER the top.

Ont. man fined $305 for smoking in workplace - his truck

By Alan Black (CP) – 12 minutes ago

TORONTO — A 48-year-old truck driver from London, Ont., has been fined for smoking at work - the cab of his rig.

Ontario Provincial Police pulled over a truck on Highway 401 near Windsor on Wednesday when the driver was seen smoking.

Police handed out a $305 ticket because smoking is prohibited at all workplaces in the province under the Smoke-Free Ontario Act.

"In the act it actually specifies what a workplace is," said Const. Shawna Coulter of the provincial police's Essex detachment.

"It says the inside of any place, building, structure or vehicle that is part of the employee's workplace, which if you're driving a truck for long periods of time - that becomes your workplace."

Transportation Minister Jim Bradley said he hasn't heard of such a case before. While he couldn't comment directly on an individual case, he said he would be watching closely if the man decides to fight the ticket in court.

"It would be interesting to see how this develops," said Bradley.

"That's interesting. It's a new one to me."

The provincial police did not comment on whether the unnamed man planned to fight the ticket and can't say for sure if it's the first such charge, but as far as Coulter knows it may be.

"We don't track specific charges, but I don't know that it's been utilized in the past," she said.

That's the way the law is supposed to work, said Health Promotion Minister Margarett Best.

"It's about health, and I'm not looking at this from the perspective of whether it's a milestone or not," Best said of the charge.

"I'm looking at it from the perspective of being concerned about the health of Ontarians."

Labour Minister Peter Fonseca also said the charge and fine were appropriate given the circumstances and the province's stated goal to reduce smoking as much as possible.

"Work vehicles were deemed workplaces in that act, so that is a place of work," said Fonseca.

The Smoke-Free Ontario Act adopted in 2006 prohibits smoking in enclosed workplaces and public areas, such as bars and restaurants.

Neil MacKenzie, the manager of tobacco programs for the Windsor-Essex County Health Unit, said even a farmer's enclosed tractor would be considered a work environment.

"Whether or not you have the sunroof open or windows down ... it's an enclosed workplace and you're prohibited from smoking in that vehicle," he told Windsor radio station CKLW.

MacKenzie added, however, that no one would march into a field and fine a farmer for smoking in an enclosed tractor.

"Before we take any radical action on it, we'd confirm with the Ministry of Health whether there's precedent," he said.

"We'd make sure the farmer understood requirements and give the opportunity for full compliance."

In June 2008, the Ontario law was extended to ban smoking in vehicles containing children under 16.

Last February, a 29-year-old woman from the Sarnia, Ont., area was charged under the ban after she was allegedly found smoking with five young children in the vehicle. Officers said they found both the driver and a 19-year-old female passenger smoking cigarettes.

Several provinces, meanwhile, plan to join forces against tobacco companies to recover health-care costs related to smoking.

Quebec confirmed earlier this month it was joining Ontario, British Columbia and New Brunswick in filing a multibillion-dollar lawsuit against tobacco manufacturers.

Ontario's $50-billion lawsuit against three tobacco companies is aimed at recovering the cost of treating smoke-related illnesses dating back as far as 1955.

The provinces began to consider legal action after a 2005 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that upheld British Columbia's right to seek compensation against tobacco companies.

-with files from Allison Jones and Keith Leslie

Copyright © 2009 The Canadian Press. All rights reserved
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6755
Smoking kills.
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6855|Mountains of NC

should have put the cig out on the ticket
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6983|NJ
What a bunch of asshole politicians.. It will be interesting to see how this progress?? Really what the fuck the poor dude just lost half his paycheck + more if he fights it..

This shit really needs to stop..
ruisleipa
Member
+149|6509|teh FIN-land
that is indeed bloody stupid.

"Neil MacKenzie, the manager of tobacco programs for the Windsor-Essex County Health Unit, said even a farmer's enclosed tractor would be considered a work environment. "Whether or not you have the sunroof open or windows down ... it's an enclosed workplace and you're prohibited from smoking in that vehicle," he told Windsor radio station CKLW."

If the windows are down IT'S NOT ENCLOSED IS IT? Or only in the same sense that a room with one wall missing is enclosed. Fucking insane. What fuckin dumb ass cop gave that ticket? Obviously some jobsworth tosser.
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6983|NJ
At what point do laws do more damage then good? If they're suing the tabocco companies I wish tthe tabacco companies would just stop selling to them so they'd loose all that tax revunie..

And an other news flash, how is the government suing to recoup medical cost? If they don't tax the product then fine, but they do and they're making money off of this horrible drug.. Fuck I"m starting to hate the world more and more these days.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6938|USA

Stubbee wrote:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5gNF94DlqdJ7sgnnzurJX5quAPVTA


Absolute bullshit. They gonna fine people for smoking in their home office too?
I think smoking is pretty vile but this is WAY OVER the top.

Ont. man fined $305 for smoking in workplace - his truck

By Alan Black (CP) – 12 minutes ago

TORONTO — A 48-year-old truck driver from London, Ont., has been fined for smoking at work - the cab of his rig.

Ontario Provincial Police pulled over a truck on Highway 401 near Windsor on Wednesday when the driver was seen smoking.

Police handed out a $305 ticket because smoking is prohibited at all workplaces in the province under the Smoke-Free Ontario Act.

"In the act it actually specifies what a workplace is," said Const. Shawna Coulter of the provincial police's Essex detachment.

"It says the inside of any place, building, structure or vehicle that is part of the employee's workplace, which if you're driving a truck for long periods of time - that becomes your workplace."

Transportation Minister Jim Bradley said he hasn't heard of such a case before. While he couldn't comment directly on an individual case, he said he would be watching closely if the man decides to fight the ticket in court.

"It would be interesting to see how this develops," said Bradley.

"That's interesting. It's a new one to me."

The provincial police did not comment on whether the unnamed man planned to fight the ticket and can't say for sure if it's the first such charge, but as far as Coulter knows it may be.

"We don't track specific charges, but I don't know that it's been utilized in the past," she said.

That's the way the law is supposed to work, said Health Promotion Minister Margarett Best.

"It's about health, and I'm not looking at this from the perspective of whether it's a milestone or not," Best said of the charge.

"I'm looking at it from the perspective of being concerned about the health of Ontarians."

Labour Minister Peter Fonseca also said the charge and fine were appropriate given the circumstances and the province's stated goal to reduce smoking as much as possible.

"Work vehicles were deemed workplaces in that act, so that is a place of work," said Fonseca.

The Smoke-Free Ontario Act adopted in 2006 prohibits smoking in enclosed workplaces and public areas, such as bars and restaurants.

Neil MacKenzie, the manager of tobacco programs for the Windsor-Essex County Health Unit, said even a farmer's enclosed tractor would be considered a work environment.

"Whether or not you have the sunroof open or windows down ... it's an enclosed workplace and you're prohibited from smoking in that vehicle," he told Windsor radio station CKLW.

MacKenzie added, however, that no one would march into a field and fine a farmer for smoking in an enclosed tractor.

"Before we take any radical action on it, we'd confirm with the Ministry of Health whether there's precedent," he said.

"We'd make sure the farmer understood requirements and give the opportunity for full compliance."

In June 2008, the Ontario law was extended to ban smoking in vehicles containing children under 16.

Last February, a 29-year-old woman from the Sarnia, Ont., area was charged under the ban after she was allegedly found smoking with five young children in the vehicle. Officers said they found both the driver and a 19-year-old female passenger smoking cigarettes.

Several provinces, meanwhile, plan to join forces against tobacco companies to recover health-care costs related to smoking.

Quebec confirmed earlier this month it was joining Ontario, British Columbia and New Brunswick in filing a multibillion-dollar lawsuit against tobacco manufacturers.

Ontario's $50-billion lawsuit against three tobacco companies is aimed at recovering the cost of treating smoke-related illnesses dating back as far as 1955.

The provinces began to consider legal action after a 2005 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that upheld British Columbia's right to seek compensation against tobacco companies.

-with files from Allison Jones and Keith Leslie

Copyright © 2009 The Canadian Press. All rights reserved
Lets see, Canada, their a liberal loving govt. are they not?  Seems logical. govt. control over your personal lives.
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7023|Salt Lake City

lowing wrote:

Stubbee wrote:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5gNF94DlqdJ7sgnnzurJX5quAPVTA


Absolute bullshit. They gonna fine people for smoking in their home office too?
I think smoking is pretty vile but this is WAY OVER the top.

Ont. man fined $305 for smoking in workplace - his truck

By Alan Black (CP) – 12 minutes ago

TORONTO — A 48-year-old truck driver from London, Ont., has been fined for smoking at work - the cab of his rig.

Ontario Provincial Police pulled over a truck on Highway 401 near Windsor on Wednesday when the driver was seen smoking.

Police handed out a $305 ticket because smoking is prohibited at all workplaces in the province under the Smoke-Free Ontario Act.

"In the act it actually specifies what a workplace is," said Const. Shawna Coulter of the provincial police's Essex detachment.

"It says the inside of any place, building, structure or vehicle that is part of the employee's workplace, which if you're driving a truck for long periods of time - that becomes your workplace."

Transportation Minister Jim Bradley said he hasn't heard of such a case before. While he couldn't comment directly on an individual case, he said he would be watching closely if the man decides to fight the ticket in court.

"It would be interesting to see how this develops," said Bradley.

"That's interesting. It's a new one to me."

The provincial police did not comment on whether the unnamed man planned to fight the ticket and can't say for sure if it's the first such charge, but as far as Coulter knows it may be.

"We don't track specific charges, but I don't know that it's been utilized in the past," she said.

That's the way the law is supposed to work, said Health Promotion Minister Margarett Best.

"It's about health, and I'm not looking at this from the perspective of whether it's a milestone or not," Best said of the charge.

"I'm looking at it from the perspective of being concerned about the health of Ontarians."

Labour Minister Peter Fonseca also said the charge and fine were appropriate given the circumstances and the province's stated goal to reduce smoking as much as possible.

"Work vehicles were deemed workplaces in that act, so that is a place of work," said Fonseca.

The Smoke-Free Ontario Act adopted in 2006 prohibits smoking in enclosed workplaces and public areas, such as bars and restaurants.

Neil MacKenzie, the manager of tobacco programs for the Windsor-Essex County Health Unit, said even a farmer's enclosed tractor would be considered a work environment.

"Whether or not you have the sunroof open or windows down ... it's an enclosed workplace and you're prohibited from smoking in that vehicle," he told Windsor radio station CKLW.

MacKenzie added, however, that no one would march into a field and fine a farmer for smoking in an enclosed tractor.

"Before we take any radical action on it, we'd confirm with the Ministry of Health whether there's precedent," he said.

"We'd make sure the farmer understood requirements and give the opportunity for full compliance."

In June 2008, the Ontario law was extended to ban smoking in vehicles containing children under 16.

Last February, a 29-year-old woman from the Sarnia, Ont., area was charged under the ban after she was allegedly found smoking with five young children in the vehicle. Officers said they found both the driver and a 19-year-old female passenger smoking cigarettes.

Several provinces, meanwhile, plan to join forces against tobacco companies to recover health-care costs related to smoking.

Quebec confirmed earlier this month it was joining Ontario, British Columbia and New Brunswick in filing a multibillion-dollar lawsuit against tobacco manufacturers.

Ontario's $50-billion lawsuit against three tobacco companies is aimed at recovering the cost of treating smoke-related illnesses dating back as far as 1955.

The provinces began to consider legal action after a 2005 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that upheld British Columbia's right to seek compensation against tobacco companies.

-with files from Allison Jones and Keith Leslie

Copyright © 2009 The Canadian Press. All rights reserved
Lets see, Canada, their a liberal loving govt. are they not?  Seems logical. govt. control over your personal lives.
Utah has very strict smoking laws as well, and those were done by the ultra conservatives.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6938|USA

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

lowing wrote:

Stubbee wrote:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5gNF94DlqdJ7sgnnzurJX5quAPVTA


Absolute bullshit. They gonna fine people for smoking in their home office too?
I think smoking is pretty vile but this is WAY OVER the top.


Lets see, Canada, their a liberal loving govt. are they not?  Seems logical. govt. control over your personal lives.
Utah has very strict smoking laws as well, and those were done by the ultra conservatives.
If you have a link to a guy getting arrested or fined for smoking in their private domain in the US I wanna see it.
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7023|Salt Lake City

lowing wrote:

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

lowing wrote:


Lets see, Canada, their a liberal loving govt. are they not?  Seems logical. govt. control over your personal lives.
Utah has very strict smoking laws as well, and those were done by the ultra conservatives.
If you have a link to a guy getting arrested or fined for smoking in their private domain in the US I wanna see it.
But it wasn't private domain.  Their laws define where/when a vehicle becomes a place of business.  This truck fell into that category.  Utah law can even prohibit smoking outside on the property of a personal residence.

Utah Code Annotated

78B-6-1101. Definitions -- Nuisance -- Right of action -- Judgment.
(1) A nuisance is anything which is injurious to health, indecent, offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property. A nuisance may be the subject of an action.
(2) A nuisance may include the following:
(a) drug houses and drug dealing as provided in Section 78B-6-1107;
(b) gambling as provided in Title 76, Chapter 10, Part 11;
(c) criminal activity committed in concert with two or more persons as provided in Section 76-3-203.1;
(d) party houses which frequently create conditions defined in Subsection (1); and
(e) prostitution as provided in Title 76, Chapter 10, Part 13.
(3) A nuisance under this part includes tobacco smoke that drifts into any residential unit a person rents, leases, or owns, from another residential or commercial unit and the smoke:
(a) drifts in more than once in each of two or more consecutive seven-day periods; and
(b) creates any of the conditions under Subsection (1).

(4) Subsection (3) does not apply to:
(a) residential rental units available for temporary rental, such as for vacations, or available for only 30 or fewer days at a time; or
(b) hotel or motel rooms.
(5) Subsection (3) does not apply to any unit that is part of a timeshare development, as defined in Section 57-19-2, or subject to a timeshare interest as defined in Section 57-19-2.
(6) An action may be brought by any person whose property is injuriously affected, or whose personal enjoyment is lessened by the nuisance.
(7) "Agricultural operation" means any facility for the production for commercial purposes of crops, livestock, poultry, livestock products, or poultry products.
(8) "Manufacturing facility" means any factory, plant, or other facility including its appurtenances, where the form of raw materials, processed materials, commodities, or other physical objects is converted or otherwise changed into other materials, commodities, or physical objects or where such materials, commodities, or physical objects are combined to form a new material, commodity, or physical object.

Read more: http://www.justanswer.com/questions/1st … z0TO27Zw1R
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6962|Canberra, AUS

lowing wrote:

Stubbee wrote:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5gNF94DlqdJ7sgnnzurJX5quAPVTA


Absolute bullshit. They gonna fine people for smoking in their home office too?
I think smoking is pretty vile but this is WAY OVER the top.

Ont. man fined $305 for smoking in workplace - his truck

By Alan Black (CP) – 12 minutes ago

TORONTO — A 48-year-old truck driver from London, Ont., has been fined for smoking at work - the cab of his rig.

Ontario Provincial Police pulled over a truck on Highway 401 near Windsor on Wednesday when the driver was seen smoking.

Police handed out a $305 ticket because smoking is prohibited at all workplaces in the province under the Smoke-Free Ontario Act.

"In the act it actually specifies what a workplace is," said Const. Shawna Coulter of the provincial police's Essex detachment.

"It says the inside of any place, building, structure or vehicle that is part of the employee's workplace, which if you're driving a truck for long periods of time - that becomes your workplace."

Transportation Minister Jim Bradley said he hasn't heard of such a case before. While he couldn't comment directly on an individual case, he said he would be watching closely if the man decides to fight the ticket in court.

"It would be interesting to see how this develops," said Bradley.

"That's interesting. It's a new one to me."

The provincial police did not comment on whether the unnamed man planned to fight the ticket and can't say for sure if it's the first such charge, but as far as Coulter knows it may be.

"We don't track specific charges, but I don't know that it's been utilized in the past," she said.

That's the way the law is supposed to work, said Health Promotion Minister Margarett Best.

"It's about health, and I'm not looking at this from the perspective of whether it's a milestone or not," Best said of the charge.

"I'm looking at it from the perspective of being concerned about the health of Ontarians."

Labour Minister Peter Fonseca also said the charge and fine were appropriate given the circumstances and the province's stated goal to reduce smoking as much as possible.

"Work vehicles were deemed workplaces in that act, so that is a place of work," said Fonseca.

The Smoke-Free Ontario Act adopted in 2006 prohibits smoking in enclosed workplaces and public areas, such as bars and restaurants.

Neil MacKenzie, the manager of tobacco programs for the Windsor-Essex County Health Unit, said even a farmer's enclosed tractor would be considered a work environment.

"Whether or not you have the sunroof open or windows down ... it's an enclosed workplace and you're prohibited from smoking in that vehicle," he told Windsor radio station CKLW.

MacKenzie added, however, that no one would march into a field and fine a farmer for smoking in an enclosed tractor.

"Before we take any radical action on it, we'd confirm with the Ministry of Health whether there's precedent," he said.

"We'd make sure the farmer understood requirements and give the opportunity for full compliance."

In June 2008, the Ontario law was extended to ban smoking in vehicles containing children under 16.

Last February, a 29-year-old woman from the Sarnia, Ont., area was charged under the ban after she was allegedly found smoking with five young children in the vehicle. Officers said they found both the driver and a 19-year-old female passenger smoking cigarettes.

Several provinces, meanwhile, plan to join forces against tobacco companies to recover health-care costs related to smoking.

Quebec confirmed earlier this month it was joining Ontario, British Columbia and New Brunswick in filing a multibillion-dollar lawsuit against tobacco manufacturers.

Ontario's $50-billion lawsuit against three tobacco companies is aimed at recovering the cost of treating smoke-related illnesses dating back as far as 1955.

The provinces began to consider legal action after a 2005 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that upheld British Columbia's right to seek compensation against tobacco companies.

-with files from Allison Jones and Keith Leslie

Copyright © 2009 The Canadian Press. All rights reserved
Lets see, Canada, their a liberal loving govt. are they not?  Seems logical. govt. control over your personal lives.
Because everything bad in Western society is because of liberals.

Wow you like threading strings.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
jaymz9350
Member
+54|6864

ruisleipa wrote:

that is indeed bloody stupid.

"Neil MacKenzie, the manager of tobacco programs for the Windsor-Essex County Health Unit, said even a farmer's enclosed tractor would be considered a work environment. "Whether or not you have the sunroof open or windows down ... it's an enclosed workplace and you're prohibited from smoking in that vehicle," he told Windsor radio station CKLW."

If the windows are down IT'S NOT ENCLOSED IS IT? Or only in the same sense that a room with one wall missing is enclosed. Fucking insane. What fuckin dumb ass cop gave that ticket? Obviously some jobsworth tosser.
How bout not being able to use the outside smoke shack after our smoking ban here in Ohio.  It was no longer legal to smoke in it because it was a fully enclosed shelter, even though it was designed and built specifically to smoke in and no other reason.
Karbin
Member
+42|6582

ruisleipa wrote:

that is indeed bloody stupid.

"Neil MacKenzie, the manager of tobacco programs for the Windsor-Essex County Health Unit, said even a farmer's enclosed tractor would be considered a work environment. "Whether or not you have the sunroof open or windows down ... it's an enclosed workplace and you're prohibited from smoking in that vehicle," he told Windsor radio station CKLW."

If the windows are down IT'S NOT ENCLOSED IS IT? Or only in the same sense that a room with one wall missing is enclosed. Fucking insane. What fuckin dumb ass cop gave that ticket? Obviously some jobsworth tosser.
In Ontario if the windows are down it is still classed as an enclosed space.
When this new law came into effect, a restaurant was warned that their sidewalk patio area would have to be smoke free.
The building had a over hang four stories above the patio. Therefore is was classed as enclosed.
At another sidewalk patio two tables were fined for having the umbrellas touching with people smoking under them. Under the law, it's an enclosed space.

Lets add to this a new law banning hand held devices, phones etc. Banned as a distraction to safe driving.
How long will it be till smoking in your car will be banned as" A distraction to safe driving"?
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5989|College Park, MD

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

lowing wrote:

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:


Utah has very strict smoking laws as well, and those were done by the ultra conservatives.
If you have a link to a guy getting arrested or fined for smoking in their private domain in the US I wanna see it.
But it wasn't private domain.  Their laws define where/when a vehicle becomes a place of business.  This truck fell into that category.  Utah law can even prohibit smoking outside on the property of a personal residence.

Utah Code Annotated

78B-6-1101. Definitions -- Nuisance -- Right of action -- Judgment.
(1) A nuisance is anything which is injurious to health, indecent, offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property. A nuisance may be the subject of an action.
(2) A nuisance may include the following:
(a) drug houses and drug dealing as provided in Section 78B-6-1107;
(b) gambling as provided in Title 76, Chapter 10, Part 11;
(c) criminal activity committed in concert with two or more persons as provided in Section 76-3-203.1;
(d) party houses which frequently create conditions defined in Subsection (1); and
(e) prostitution as provided in Title 76, Chapter 10, Part 13.
(3) A nuisance under this part includes tobacco smoke that drifts into any residential unit a person rents, leases, or owns, from another residential or commercial unit and the smoke:
(a) drifts in more than once in each of two or more consecutive seven-day periods; and
(b) creates any of the conditions under Subsection (1).

(4) Subsection (3) does not apply to:
(a) residential rental units available for temporary rental, such as for vacations, or available for only 30 or fewer days at a time; or
(b) hotel or motel rooms.
(5) Subsection (3) does not apply to any unit that is part of a timeshare development, as defined in Section 57-19-2, or subject to a timeshare interest as defined in Section 57-19-2.
(6) An action may be brought by any person whose property is injuriously affected, or whose personal enjoyment is lessened by the nuisance.
(7) "Agricultural operation" means any facility for the production for commercial purposes of crops, livestock, poultry, livestock products, or poultry products.
(8) "Manufacturing facility" means any factory, plant, or other facility including its appurtenances, where the form of raw materials, processed materials, commodities, or other physical objects is converted or otherwise changed into other materials, commodities, or physical objects or where such materials, commodities, or physical objects are combined to form a new material, commodity, or physical object.

Read more: http://www.justanswer.com/questions/1st … z0TO27Zw1R
why the hell do you live in that hellhole?
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
ruisleipa
Member
+149|6509|teh FIN-land

Karbin wrote:

In Ontario if the windows are down it is still classed as an enclosed space.
When this new law came into effect, a restaurant was warned that their sidewalk patio area would have to be smoke free.
The building had a over hang four stories above the patio. Therefore is was classed as enclosed.
At another sidewalk patio two tables were fined for having the umbrellas touching with people smoking under them. Under the law, it's an enclosed space.
well that is completely illogical and an affront to the English language. The law is an ass.
Karbin
Member
+42|6582

ruisleipa wrote:

Karbin wrote:

In Ontario if the windows are down it is still classed as an enclosed space.
When this new law came into effect, a restaurant was warned that their sidewalk patio area would have to be smoke free.
The building had a over hang four stories above the patio. Therefore is was classed as enclosed.
At another sidewalk patio two tables were fined for having the umbrellas touching with people smoking under them. Under the law, it's an enclosed space.
well that is completely illogical and an affront to the English language. The law is an ass.
But.......
It's still the law.
In the U.S. it's:
"Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness"
In Canada it's:
"Life, Liberty and Security".

Smoking is bad, therefore protecting you from it falls under "Security".

FYI There has NEVER been a successful court challenge the Ontario anti-smoking laws.... at any level.
Bradt3hleader
Care [ ] - Don't care [x]
+121|6223
Cool there's a guy in there who's name is Bradley...

Oh wait this is D&ST

Yeah that's fucking ridiculous, if he wants to fill his lungs with crap let him, it won't hurt others. Geez Canada has stupid stuff.
krazed
Admiral of the Bathtub
+619|7067|Great Brown North
lol Bantario

this doesn't shock me at all



if they're alone it shouldn't matter, but the gov. won't listen now that they have a new way to get money out of people




Karbin wrote:

"Life, Liberty and Security".
life, so long as you're an immigrant/native/minority and qualify for benefits

liberty, only if you're a criminal

security? hahahaha yeah... that's why we're being attacked by natives on CROWN FUCKING LAND and the RCMP look the other way.

also why we have an exploding gang problem.... good thing the OPP is spending it's time looking up people who had let their firearms license lapse so they can send officers to seize and fine   that gem was called "operation safe city" i think

oh and training their new guys to shoot first, shoot some more, reload and shoot a few more times (and miss the whole time)... only to find out the guy was unarmed the whole time

he's a hero of the community but a guy cleaning a hunting rifle on his deck is a "public danger"

Last edited by krazed (2009-10-09 05:45:47)

Diesel_dyk
Object in mirror will feel larger than it appears
+178|6281|Truthistan
But I have to laugh... big fat truckers (stereotype) who aren't allowed to smoke in their own trucks.... ROFL

But Canada, and other places in the US... its all about developing a revenue stream.

Tax tobacco because it makes the state money
Then when tobacco is unacceptable
Tax people through fines for smoking

They got you coming and going
Chou
Member
+737|7078
It's an income to compensate the economic crisis.
Monkey Spanker
Show it to the nice monkey.
+284|6539|England

Stubbee wrote:

In June 2008, the Ontario law was extended to ban smoking in vehicles containing children under 16.
Now that i agree with tbh should be bought in asap here in the UK.
Quote of the year so far "Fifa 11 on the other hand... shiny things for mongos "-mtb0minime
https://bf3s.com/sigs/f30415b2d1cff840176cce816dc76d89a7929bb0.png
CanadianLoser
Meow :3 :3
+1,148|6795
lol I'm from London seriously though, you can't smoke on the job and he was on the job.  Tough.
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6983|NJ

CanadianLoser wrote:

lol I'm from London seriously though, you can't smoke on the job and he was on the job.  Tough.
Hmm that's retarded...

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard