Yeah 100% agree with you there...it's unfortunate. Exact reason why I've given up on mainstream media.Kmarion wrote:
There is no uproar because it's absurd, and it's not like the media would present it anyways. The same argument is made as far as Muslims. Why aren't they speaking out against the radicals etc.. Frankly (and sadly) it's not as entertaining, and so it lacks shock value.TrueMusou wrote:
I've given up on mainstream media and take whatever they present to me with a grain of salt.Kmarion wrote:
Why would I deny that poster is not racist when I just made it clear that racism still exist on varying levels? You are posting examples from the extremist. TBH I think some of these people are out there as a response to 8 years of Bush Derangement syndrome. Do you think that what the media presents to you is the norm? You complain about Fox news and it's influence while simultaneity having your own opinion molded by a couple jpegs and a youtube video. So it seems.
True, these are examples presented are of extremists...but the extremists are the ones getting all the media coverage and that's the problem. There is no uproar from the moderates in the right to reject any of the extremists' views. Thus, many who DO watch the media accept that the right is generally THAT extreme.
I am squared away to know that the entire conservative whole does not think the way the extremists do.
This is not a left/right issue neither. I'm sure many righties wondered for years where the left moderates were when the extreme left was burning effigies of Bush.
I welcome all opinions, what I am sick of is the manner on which those opinions are delivered such as your previous smart ass, bounce off the wall post. God knows I do not share a popular opinion in this forum, and I have had many disagreements with people that I still could carry on conversations with. Now this last post of yours I welcome.burnzz wrote:
so, you do not think Obama is monkey-shit crazy?
Then why do people compare him to Hitler? i am NOT singling you out lowing, i see Obama portraits with the little mustache, and i cannot for the life of me understand the comparison. i can say the same for Bush, a while ago - why, left or right, would anyone compare a modern president to a twentieth century genocidal dictator? Fuck the left AND the right lowing, the fringes are shrill from both sides and sheeple inhabit the middle.
i am sick of people like you lowing, who fail to see that any opinion not shared by you is wrong. i have an opinion, i did not personally attack you, and the one reason i do not hold you responsible for not allowing me my opinion is because you are constitutionally incapable of it.
Good day, sir.
to answer your question though. Obama is being denoted as Hitler because of his fascist govt. control solutions on everything. Which by the way is true. ever notoce how none of his solutions involves the private sector?
I do not think Obama is ( monkey) crazy, I think he knows exactly what he he doing.
I'll differ to this again with the Hitler analogy.
http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=bjba52&s=3
http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=bjba52&s=3
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Bullshit.Obama is being denoted as Hitler because of his fascist govt. control solutions on everything. Which by the way is true. ever notoce how none of his solutions involves the private sector?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Repubs are like this. If a repub president does shit like Patriot Act hes called a true american and we should swear allegiance to him. When the table turns they start bitching.Spark wrote:
Bullshit.Obama is being denoted as Hitler because of his fascist govt. control solutions on everything. Which by the way is true. ever notoce how none of his solutions involves the private sector?
lowing, we're sorry your country elected a black socialist moslem.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Maybe because the private sector is a bunch of cash whores who are only interested in your money?lowing wrote:
to answer your question though. Obama is being denoted as Hitler because of his fascist govt. control solutions on everything. Which by the way is true. ever notoce how none of his solutions involves the private sector?
Comparing Obama to Hitler isn't racist. I don't know where you got the idea that it is, but it's a retarded idea. Comparing Obama to a monkey when there's precedent in the US for referring to African -Americans as "porch monkeys" and "gorillas in the mist" could be construed as racism. I'm not saying it is or isn't, but I can see where the reaction is based.lowing wrote:
Compare Obama to a monkey and Hitler and ask yourself the same questionKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
How could comparing Bush to a monkey or Hitler be construed as racism?
What good does it serve to quote drivel in "proving" your point that people are going to claim racism for the next four years? It's a fringe element. It's not worth your or my time to even give thought to these idiotic statements.
I JUST BEAT UP MY FIRST BLACK GUY! seriously.
Agreedlowing wrote:
I am not, especially when it is correct, and politically incorrect.[TUF]Catbox wrote:
I'm afraid to have an opinion...
I didn't get the idea that an Obama/Hitler comparison was racist, Carter didKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Comparing Obama to Hitler isn't racist. I don't know where you got the idea that it is, but it's a retarded idea. Comparing Obama to a monkey when there's precedent in the US for referring to African -Americans as "porch monkeys" and "gorillas in the mist" could be construed as racism. I'm not saying it is or isn't, but I can see where the reaction is based.lowing wrote:
Compare Obama to a monkey and Hitler and ask yourself the same questionKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
How could comparing Bush to a monkey or Hitler be construed as racism?
What good does it serve to quote drivel in "proving" your point that people are going to claim racism for the next four years? It's a fringe element. It's not worth your or my time to even give thought to these idiotic statements.
"Only this time Carter was a tad more specific, targeting those “demonstrators” as who describe Obama “as a reincarnation of Adolf Hitler, or when they wave signs in the air that we should have buried Obama with Kennedy” as having a “racist attitude.” "
http://www.mediaite.com/online/jimmy-ca … rotesters/
This thread goes to the prediction that was made during the election that if you go against Obama you are a racist. Voting for him because he is black is not racist, NOT voting for him because he is black IS racist. This thread goes toward the inconsistency and double standard and irrational logic that plagues the liberal ideology.
Nope the private sector is interested in EARNING money/making a profit. It is the govt. who is interested in seizing your money. But I for got, in liberal land earning and profiting is a bad thing, seizing from others is the more desirable method of income.Wreckognize wrote:
Maybe because the private sector is a bunch of cash whores who are only interested in your money?lowing wrote:
to answer your question though. Obama is being denoted as Hitler because of his fascist govt. control solutions on everything. Which by the way is true. ever notoce how none of his solutions involves the private sector?
Ya, whatever you do, do not even back up your comment with an explaination as to how I am wrong, and Obama is not interested in govt controlSpark wrote:
Bullshit.Obama is being denoted as Hitler because of his fascist govt. control solutions on everything. Which by the way is true. ever notoce how none of his solutions involves the private sector?
You're the one making ridiculous accusations of fascisms and complete ignorance of the private sector, you back them up.lowing wrote:
Ya, whatever you do, do not even back up your comment with an explaination as to how I am wrong, and Obama is not interested in govt controlSpark wrote:
Bullshit.Obama is being denoted as Hitler because of his fascist govt. control solutions on everything. Which by the way is true. ever notoce how none of his solutions involves the private sector?
Do you even know what racism means?Voting for him because he is black is not racist, NOT voting for him because he is black IS racist. This thread goes toward the inconsistency and double standard and irrational logic that plagues the liberal ideology.
Last edited by Spark (2009-09-19 06:28:11)
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
So Millions going to the head of FAILED companies is "EARNING"?lowing wrote:
Nope the private sector is interested in EARNING money/making a profit. It is the govt. who is interested in seizing your money. But I for got, in liberal land earning and profiting is a bad thing, seizing from others is the more desirable method of income.Wreckognize wrote:
Maybe because the private sector is a bunch of cash whores who are only interested in your money?lowing wrote:
to answer your question though. Obama is being denoted as Hitler because of his fascist govt. control solutions on everything. Which by the way is true. ever notoce how none of his solutions involves the private sector?
When you make a profit by deceiving millions of Americans then yes, it is a bad thing.lowing wrote:
Nope the private sector is interested in EARNING money/making a profit. It is the govt. who is interested in seizing your money. But I for got, in liberal land earning and profiting is a bad thing, seizing from others is the more desirable method of income.Wreckognize wrote:
Maybe because the private sector is a bunch of cash whores who are only interested in your money?lowing wrote:
to answer your question though. Obama is being denoted as Hitler because of his fascist govt. control solutions on everything. Which by the way is true. ever notoce how none of his solutions involves the private sector?
Nothing rediculous about my accusations, unless of course you think Obama is for less govt. and if you do then you are the one who is baring your ass.Spark wrote:
You're the one making ridiculous accusations of fascisms and complete ignorance of the private sector, you back them up.lowing wrote:
Ya, whatever you do, do not even back up your comment with an explaination as to how I am wrong, and Obama is not interested in govt controlSpark wrote:
Bullshit.Do you even know what racism means?Voting for him because he is black is not racist, NOT voting for him because he is black IS racist. This thread goes toward the inconsistency and double standard and irrational logic that plagues the liberal ideology.
Nope, enlighten me Spark.
That is not what the private sector is about. I am against bail outs and so are most of us.nlsme1 wrote:
So Millions going to the head of FAILED companies is "EARNING"?lowing wrote:
Nope the private sector is interested in EARNING money/making a profit. It is the govt. who is interested in seizing your money. But I for got, in liberal land earning and profiting is a bad thing, seizing from others is the more desirable method of income.Wreckognize wrote:
Maybe because the private sector is a bunch of cash whores who are only interested in your money?
example pleaseWreckognize wrote:
When you make a profit by deceiving millions of Americans then yes, it is a bad thing.lowing wrote:
Nope the private sector is interested in EARNING money/making a profit. It is the govt. who is interested in seizing your money. But I for got, in liberal land earning and profiting is a bad thing, seizing from others is the more desirable method of income.Wreckognize wrote:
Maybe because the private sector is a bunch of cash whores who are only interested in your money?
Oil industry, pharmaceutical industry, insurance industry, auto industry, etc.
Hell, even the cell phone industry is raping consumers through outrageous texting charges.
Hell, even the cell phone industry is raping consumers through outrageous texting charges.
Last edited by Wreckognize (2009-09-19 12:45:48)
I loled
Xbone Stormsurgezz
The government isn't "seizing your money." Have you forgotten where you live? If you see the government's taxation as "seizing" your income...then emigrate to another country where they won't seize your money. As long as you live in the US and belong in the American society, you have a obligation as a citizen to pay back into the government and the society.lowing wrote:
example pleaseWreckognize wrote:
When you make a profit by deceiving millions of Americans then yes, it is a bad thing.lowing wrote:
Nope the private sector is interested in EARNING money/making a profit. It is the govt. who is interested in seizing your money. But I for got, in liberal land earning and profiting is a bad thing, seizing from others is the more desirable method of income.
This is one problem that capitalism has created. A entire society who feels EVERYTHING they earn is mine, mine, mine. They forget they actually live in a dynamic SOCIETY, as a member of this society you are obligated to put back in what you've taken out.
It's just that, it sucks working all day then when you get your paycheck they take out a shitload for taxes that go either to Israel or Jose and Maria illegal immigrant health care or Jamal's welfare. It's annoying.TrueMusou wrote:
The government isn't "seizing your money." Have you forgotten where you live? If you see the government's taxation as "seizing" your income...then emigrate to another country where they won't seize your money. As long as you live in the US and belong in the American society, you have a obligation as a citizen to pay back into the government and the society.lowing wrote:
example pleaseWreckognize wrote:
When you make a profit by deceiving millions of Americans then yes, it is a bad thing.
This is one problem that capitalism has created. A entire society who feels EVERYTHING they earn is mine, mine, mine. They forget they actually live in a dynamic SOCIETY, as a member of this society you are obligated to put back in what you've taken out.
I would say that that's not where most of your taxes are going. Governments have other jobs other than welfare you know...Macbeth wrote:
It's just that, it sucks working all day then when you get your paycheck they take out a shitload for taxes that go either to Israel or Jose and Maria illegal immigrant health care or Jamal's welfare. It's annoying.TrueMusou wrote:
The government isn't "seizing your money." Have you forgotten where you live? If you see the government's taxation as "seizing" your income...then emigrate to another country where they won't seize your money. As long as you live in the US and belong in the American society, you have a obligation as a citizen to pay back into the government and the society.lowing wrote:
example please
This is one problem that capitalism has created. A entire society who feels EVERYTHING they earn is mine, mine, mine. They forget they actually live in a dynamic SOCIETY, as a member of this society you are obligated to put back in what you've taken out.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Finally, someone who understands. The govment need to git out of our lives. The military and police should be privatized, money should be the real insentive to fight wars and patrol the streets, not this civic duty bullshit. all state and federal land should be turned over to mining and logging conglomerates, they know how to manage resources. And don't even get me started on NASA, a bunch of godless money burners. Imagine a world where honest, morally determined corporations are free from the tyranny of govment. Free to pursue responsible, ethically feasible and sustainable commercial practices so as to provide quality services to customers and liveable wages to employees. It brings a teer to my eye.lowing wrote:
Nope the private sector is interested in EARNING money/making a profit. It is the govt. who is interested in seizing your money. But I for got, in liberal land earning and profiting is a bad thing, seizing from others is the more desirable method of income.