Cockfosters.
wat
wat
Explain howGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
LOL I don't want to sound dickhead, but that was a quite a bit wrong lolFinray wrote:
Advantages of 64 bit -
The data bus is basically a cable from your CPU to your memory. The amount of data that travels along it is govnered by the bittype of your OS. If you have a 32-bit OS you can only use 32 bits on your data bus. If you use 64 bits then you can utilise all 64 bits on your bus. This makes barely any difference when surfing the net or downloading porn, but when you try to display graphics then it makes a whole lot of difference. It more than doubles the speed at which data can be read/written from the memory, leading to a faster, smoother graphic onto the screen.
Advantages of 32 bit -
More shit is supported, but when Windows 7 comes out, I'm betting almost all of the mainstream computers (£600 Dell laptops) will use 64 bit, therefore 64 bit will become the more popular operating system, and so people will stop designing applications to run solely on 32 bit computers, and start designing them as 64 bit default.
(I'm basing that off about a month of computing teaching, so I might be wrong, I'm willing to accept that).
rofl, you didn't know shit about binary but now you do right?Finray wrote:
To be quite brutally honest with you, unless you take the higher you don't have a fucking clue. I didn't know shit about binary, memory adress registers, floating point numbers, clock speeds, FLOPS, or any other shit I have learned in computing before I took the class.
I will agree with your latter paragraph, that was quite well put.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 3#p2796243
ahahahaha
moron
What kind of BS is this? Are these your wet dreams cos it ain't gonna happen like thatCock Goblin wrote:
Advantages of 64 bit -
The data bus is basically a cable from your CPU to your memory. The amount of data that travels along it is govnered by the bittype of your OS. If you have a 32-bit OS you can only use 32 bits on your data bus. If you use 64 bits then you can utilise all 64 bits on your bus. This makes barely any difference when surfing the net or downloading porn, but when you try to display graphics then it makes a whole lot of difference. It more than doubles the speed at which data can be read/written from the memory, leading to a faster, smoother graphic onto the screen.
Advantages of 32 bit -
More shit is supported, but when Windows 7 comes out, I'm betting almost all of the mainstream computers (£600 Dell laptops) will use 64 bit, therefore 64 bit will become the more popular operating system, and so people will stop designing applications to run solely on 32 bit computers, and start designing them as 64 bit default.
In the post you pointed to, I meant to write byte not bit. I said I got it wrong further down.Dauntless wrote:
rofl, you didn't know shit about binary but now you do right?Finray wrote:
To be quite brutally honest with you, unless you take the higher you don't have a fucking clue. I didn't know shit about binary, memory adress registers, floating point numbers, clock speeds, FLOPS, or any other shit I have learned in computing before I took the class.
I will agree with your latter paragraph, that was quite well put.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 3#p2796243
ahahahaha
moron
moron.
oh wah wah wah i tested it harder than you, me = you+1, i > you etc.etc..Sup wrote:
How did you measure stability in XP and Vista Uzique?Uzique wrote:
if that's your reasoning then all you anti-mac fanboys are "ignorant" too..Sup wrote:
Don't be ignorant. If you say Vista has less issues than XP you're either extremely lucky or you just OC your PC from BIOS and never actually enter Windows.
'less issues'? god if you really cared all that much you would have picked up OSX years ago. bullshit reason. vista is more stable nowadays than xp.
fuck off
i overclocked, played games, used a wide range of software apps and suites, programmed briefly, variety of sound+music activities... who cares how i qualify it? the xp versus vista argument is just a case of patching. xp was more secure than vista when it was first released- no shit. nowadays vista is more stable than xp and has little-to-no drawbacks from xp. suuuch a tired tech bandwagon. you keep on playing with windows 2000 ME, never daring to launch any app in > 32-bit because it's too 'new', whatever keeps you happy. all my games and software worked just fine on vista 64 ultimate, since the day it was released.
Last edited by Uzique (2009-09-12 15:26:59)
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
http://www.infopackets.com/news/hardwar … erence.htm.Sup wrote:
What kind of BS is this? Are these your wet dreams cos it ain't gonna happen like thatCock Goblin wrote:
Advantages of 64 bit -
The data bus is basically a cable from your CPU to your memory. The amount of data that travels along it is govnered by the bittype of your OS. If you have a 32-bit OS you can only use 32 bits on your data bus. If you use 64 bits then you can utilise all 64 bits on your bus. This makes barely any difference when surfing the net or downloading porn, but when you try to display graphics then it makes a whole lot of difference. It more than doubles the speed at which data can be read/written from the memory, leading to a faster, smoother graphic onto the screen.
Advantages of 32 bit -
More shit is supported, but when Windows 7 comes out, I'm betting almost all of the mainstream computers (£600 Dell laptops) will use 64 bit, therefore 64 bit will become the more popular operating system, and so people will stop designing applications to run solely on 32 bit computers, and start designing them as 64 bit default.
lol you meant to write that 3 fucking times?Finray wrote:
In the post you pointed to, I meant to write byte not bit. I said I got it wrong further down.Dauntless wrote:
rofl, you didn't know shit about binary but now you do right?Finray wrote:
To be quite brutally honest with you, unless you take the higher you don't have a fucking clue. I didn't know shit about binary, memory adress registers, floating point numbers, clock speeds, FLOPS, or any other shit I have learned in computing before I took the class.
I will agree with your latter paragraph, that was quite well put.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 3#p2796243
ahahahaha
moron
moron.
Finray wrote:
..Except that's one and a half bits.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Actually, optical>copper. Optical connections are far less sensitive to jitter (basically the bits arriving as 0 10110 0 1 0110 than 010110010110) than copper ones.
Finray wrote:
A bit = 8x 1 or 0.Freezer7Pro wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitFinray wrote:
..Except that's one and a half bits.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte
Sure guyFinray wrote:
Indeed, I'm not disputing this fact, I'm saying that a bit is made up of 8 binary digits.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
no. A byte = 8x bitsFinray wrote:
A bit = 8x 1 or 0.
my argument still stands that ib/highers/a-levels mean shit.
barely scratching the surface. doesnt validate anything you say just because you're taking some shitty college course.
barely scratching the surface. doesnt validate anything you say just because you're taking some shitty college course.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Its not about security at all.Cock Goblin no.2 wrote:
oh wah wah wah i tested it harder than you, me = you+1, i > you etc.etc..Sup wrote:
How did you measure stability in XP and Vista Uzique?Uzique wrote:
if that's your reasoning then all you anti-mac fanboys are "ignorant" too.
'less issues'? god if you really cared all that much you would have picked up OSX years ago. bullshit reason. vista is more stable nowadays than xp.
fuck off
i overclocked, played games, used a wide range of software apps and suites, programmed briefly, variety of sound+music activities... who cares how i qualify it? the xp versus vista argument is just a case of patching. xp was more secure than vista when it was first released- no shit. nowadays vista is more stable than xp and has little-to-no drawbacks from xp. suuuch a tired tech bandwagon. you keep on playing with windows 2000 ME, never daring to launch any app in > 32-bit because it's too 'new', whatever keeps you happy. all my games and software worked just fine on vista 64 ultimate, since the day it was released.
Try Windows 7 out and see how Vista was meant to be and how it actually is.
Last edited by .Sup (2009-09-12 15:32:58)
Yep. A big cockup, sure, but I know what a bit and a byte is.Dauntless wrote:
lol you meant to write that 3 fucking times?
@Uzi, I've not done my higher computing yet, I'm still studying it.
Last edited by Finray (2009-09-12 15:30:39)
WTF are you people doing to Chats? there's a whole section dedicated to this.
i spend all fucking week working with pc's, routers, servers, and on my weekend
you gotta bring this in here?
shame on ya.
i spend all fucking week working with pc's, routers, servers, and on my weekend
you gotta bring this in here?
shame on ya.
Does it really say 2006 in the link? Didn't read the articleFinray wrote:
http://www.infopackets.com/news/hardwar … erence.htm.Sup wrote:
What kind of BS is this? Are these your wet dreams cos it ain't gonna happen like thatCock Goblin wrote:
Advantages of 64 bit -
The data bus is basically a cable from your CPU to your memory. The amount of data that travels along it is govnered by the bittype of your OS. If you have a 32-bit OS you can only use 32 bits on your data bus. If you use 64 bits then you can utilise all 64 bits on your bus. This makes barely any difference when surfing the net or downloading porn, but when you try to display graphics then it makes a whole lot of difference. It more than doubles the speed at which data can be read/written from the memory, leading to a faster, smoother graphic onto the screen.
Advantages of 32 bit -
More shit is supported, but when Windows 7 comes out, I'm betting almost all of the mainstream computers (£600 Dell laptops) will use 64 bit, therefore 64 bit will become the more popular operating system, and so people will stop designing applications to run solely on 32 bit computers, and start designing them as 64 bit default.
DAST Chat - Septemberburnzz wrote:
WTF are you people doing to Chats? there's a whole section dedicated to this.
i spend all fucking week working with pc's, routers, servers, and on my weekend
you gotta bring this in here?
shame on ya.
Yes, because information on the fundamentals of how processers work changes in 3 years.Sup wrote:
Does it really say 2006 in the link? Didn't read the articleFinray wrote:
http://www.infopackets.com/news/hardwar … erence.htm.Sup wrote:
What kind of BS is this? Are these your wet dreams cos it ain't gonna happen like that
sup i never ever noticed slowdowns or lock-ups with vista 64. my machine's specs were good enough to run it even though it wasn't optimized. again, if it's not about security or bugs and it's about speed and efficiency... get a fucking mac. "ignorance". you pussies cry about these factors in windows xp->vista->7, whilst ignoring the fact that there are way better alternatives anyway.
vista 64 did me perfect. ran crysis 64-bit dx10 max settings yada-yada with playable FPS. never slowed down or froze. what's the issue? windows 7 runs faster? g-r-e-a-t! that's a good upgrade then! just like vista was a GOOD upgrade to xp!
vista 64 did me perfect. ran crysis 64-bit dx10 max settings yada-yada with playable FPS. never slowed down or froze. what's the issue? windows 7 runs faster? g-r-e-a-t! that's a good upgrade then! just like vista was a GOOD upgrade to xp!
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
My Windows 7 x64 > Your OSX in every way imaginableUzique wrote:
hahahahahahFinray wrote:
Higher computing, zing.Uzique wrote:
christ spare me the next 3 pages of poorly-understood 64-bit 'geek-talk' attempts from finray.
he gets his computer knowledge and pro-gaming kudos from reading other people's posts on internet forums, ffs.
oh shit finray has a shitty scottish higher-education qualification in 'higher computing'. they barely cover that shit in 'higher computing', i know my fair share of dumbasses that did BTEC diplomas in ICT, you've hardly studied core architecture at fucking MIT. take your "zing" and shove it, you get all of your gaming and computer knowledge from fucking google, you're a poseur and it's painfully obvious to everyone as soon as you open your mouth and start yapping on incessantly about 'xyz' bullshit.
for the record: vista is better than xp. if you dont like vista, the problem is YOU.
64-bit is better than 32-bit, if it doesnt work, the problem is YOU or YOUR shitty apps, failing that it's your failure in choosing windows 64-bit instead of OSX which is the killerest most awesome 64-bit OS in the motherfucking occidental world.
ken is on xfire.
thescentoftrees
thescentoftrees
Finray wrote:
XP > Vista.
/bait
/bait
Lets make a thread: Tech - Chat to tech section? yes, no?
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
All Operating Systems Are Worthless
OMG he's upside down! Quick! Get Spiderman!burnzz wrote:
http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/21025/ss/usd.jpg
I hear everybody gets one.