Pages: 1 … 52 53 54 55 56 … 64
Last edited by venom6 (2009-08-28 17:39:18)
1) No - The ribbons are awarded for playing in a theater, not as an army. There would have to be an invasion of Europe for there to be a European theater. This is the same reason the NA service ribbon is only available through AF.venom6 wrote:
Will we get the EU Ribbon finally?
Will we get the missing awards?
Will we get the Expert Armor badge time reduced?
http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n278 … ards-1.png
What about these awards??? Would be a 10 min work to add them!
The MEC,PLA,AF ribbons are awarded if you play on the maps they are listing. Same would happen to EF as you should play on the 3 EF maps to earn that ribbon. It would be something new for the players who will play EF the first time as the boosters are free now!Sup3r_Dr4gon wrote:
1) No - The ribbons are awarded for playing in a theater, not as an army. There would have to be an invasion of Europe for there to be a European theater. This is the same reason the NA service ribbon is only available through AF.venom6 wrote:
Will we get the EU Ribbon finally?
Will we get the missing awards?
Will we get the Expert Armor badge time reduced?
http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n278 … ards-1.png
What about these awards??? Would be a 10 min work to add them!
2) I seriously doubt it - The laser designator and SF jets were removed from the game. The LCAC was removed too, so I'd imagine the boat related awards would be nigh impossible to get in a RIB. As for the NV badges and SF kit medals.....I'd imagine it's a bit late to add them in, though it would be nice.
3) I doubt that too.
Utter failure IMO.- Added Battlefield 2142 style prone deviation (going prone will now cause reduced accuracy for a brief period)
Utter win IMO.RDMC wrote:
Utter failure IMO.- Added Battlefield 2142 style prone deviation (going prone will now cause reduced accuracy for a brief period)
This.Pubic wrote:
I never blackwhored when splash damage was huge.
I plan to make up for lost time.
u not gunna steal my pwnagecow!PrivateVendetta wrote:
This.Pubic wrote:
I never blackwhored when splash damage was huge.
I plan to make up for lost time.
Indeed. 2142 has almost no pronespammers as pronespamming is ineffective.FloppY_ wrote:
Utter win IMO.RDMC wrote:
Utter failure IMO.- Added Battlefield 2142 style prone deviation (going prone will now cause reduced accuracy for a brief period)
Fat_Swinub wrote:
and thats why its the best and most popular battlefield game to date. just look at all those shiny new threads in the 2142 section
It's not, but not because gameplay suck, but because of wrong attempt to switch battlefield franchise to future thematics, while Battlefield fans prefer XX century and modern warfare. Speaking of gameplay and balance, 2142 is way more superior than BF2, but as I already stated, I also prefer AK or M16 (generiс comparison) over some futuristic crap.Fat_Swinub wrote:
and thats why its the best and most popular battlefield game to date. just look at all those shiny new threads in the 2142 section
Hmmm,.. I think also 2142 in some vital aspects was a step back from BF2. For starters it lacked a third faction, which makes the game less "deep". BF2 even had a 4th faction added with EF and several other with SF. Other small steps back include, but are not limited to, 22th century APC's spontaneously combusting when in 10 centimeters of water and much less visually varried maps.Longbow wrote:
It's not, but not because gameplay suck, but because of wrong attempt to switch battlefield franchise to future thematics, while Battlefield fans prefer XX century and modern warfare. Speaking of gameplay and balance, 2142 is way more superior than BF2, but as I already stated, I also prefer AK or M16 (generiс comparison) over some futuristic crap.Fat_Swinub wrote:
and thats why its the best and most popular battlefield game to date. just look at all those shiny new threads in the 2142 section
so trueLai wrote:
Hmmm,.. I think also 2142 in some vital aspects was a step back from BF2. For starters it lacked a third faction, which makes the game less "deep". BF2 even had a 4th faction added with EF and several other with SF. Other small steps back include, but are not limited to, 22th century APC's spontaneously combusting when in 10 centimeters of water and much less visually varried maps.Longbow wrote:
It's not, but not because gameplay suck, but because of wrong attempt to switch battlefield franchise to future thematics, while Battlefield fans prefer XX century and modern warfare. Speaking of gameplay and balance, 2142 is way more superior than BF2, but as I already stated, I also prefer AK or M16 (generiс comparison) over some futuristic crap.Fat_Swinub wrote:
and thats why its the best and most popular battlefield game to date. just look at all those shiny new threads in the 2142 section
The one real innovative aspect of 2142 was Titan Mode, but that was already nerfed to death in 1.12. I've played the (unnerfed) demo and the most intense larger frame strategical started when both Titans had their shields down. Titans were seldom effectively used by commanders, if moved at all, but when one of the shields was down they would often play cat and mouse and when both the shields were down Titans would broadside with droppods. After the patch Titans could no longer move without shields, because it caused too much unresolvable lag. IMO that is really poor game design. Also nerfing the droppods didn't help either.
Last edited by globefish23 (2009-08-30 15:40:07)
I miss podrolling gunships...thepilot91 wrote:
so trueLai wrote:
Hmmm,.. I think also 2142 in some vital aspects was a step back from BF2. For starters it lacked a third faction, which makes the game less "deep". BF2 even had a 4th faction added with EF and several other with SF. Other small steps back include, but are not limited to, 22th century APC's spontaneously combusting when in 10 centimeters of water and much less visually varried maps.Longbow wrote:
It's not, but not because gameplay suck, but because of wrong attempt to switch battlefield franchise to future thematics, while Battlefield fans prefer XX century and modern warfare. Speaking of gameplay and balance, 2142 is way more superior than BF2, but as I already stated, I also prefer AK or M16 (generiс comparison) over some futuristic crap.
The one real innovative aspect of 2142 was Titan Mode, but that was already nerfed to death in 1.12. I've played the (unnerfed) demo and the most intense larger frame strategical started when both Titans had their shields down. Titans were seldom effectively used by commanders, if moved at all, but when one of the shields was down they would often play cat and mouse and when both the shields were down Titans would broadside with droppods. After the patch Titans could no longer move without shields, because it caused too much unresolvable lag. IMO that is really poor game design. Also nerfing the droppods didn't help either.
Pages: 1 … 52 53 54 55 56 … 64
