Pochsy wrote:
No, no, you've missed the call. I've already asked you (in my edit) not to attempt an explanation of the nature of free will or our disposition towards domination, and thus the elimination of free will.
By questions the source of your inspiration I hoped to incite your better judgement and not attempt a discussion built on such a lousy foundation. Bf2s is no better than a drunken Slovenian; I suggest you go read some serious philosophy.
I've read your request and frankly I don't give a shit. I for one did not make this thread to suit your everyday Western assumptions. For the given scenario you take for granted "our disposition towards domination, and thus the elimination of free will". I think for anyone to take anything for granted, they should also be able to justify taking it for granted. Turning it around by saying it is justified because it is commonly taken for granted is no proper argumentation. I daresay a drunken Slovenian can do better.
Tbh I really hate the guts out of Aladdin and frankly any other animated Disney production. The only way I want to see Bambi is on a plate. I provided the example of Aladdin and the wish to illustrate why eliminating someone's free will, at least in this scenario, can not work.
Mekstizzle wrote:
Lai wrote:
Mekstizzle wrote:
Because <insert cliché sentence about love being more special than magic>
That would still be merely an observation, not an explanation
No, it is an explanation. You're asking why did they make it so the Genie can't just make the Princess fall in love with the dude. I'm merly pointing to all the bullshit that the entertainment world (that ranges from poets, to movies) says about love. And that there's no need to repeat it all as it's always in your face anyway, and everyone knows the basic structure of it.
It's sort of a no brainer. There is no deep philosophical meaning to it. It's just how shit is.
I agree with you fully, Disney is practically synonymous for cliche. I also firmly believe that the "genius" who wrote the script for Aladdin, wrote it on the same taken for-granted-basis as proposed by Buckles and Pochsy. Yet I'm not asking you to provide me a Disney explanation, I'm asking you if you could think of a deeper philosophical meaning if you had to ascribe one.
Last edited by Lai (2009-08-29 08:42:31)