lowing
Banned
+1,662|6939|USA

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

lowing, you (might not be you specifically I can't remember lol) always talk about the slippery slope to things, ie: when you do something where does it stop. If a judge can give someone 6 months for yawning, why couldn't they give 12 months for speaking or 6 months for excessive crying or 12 months for not sitting with correct posture. Seriously, our courts aren't here to punish smartarses, they are here to punish criminals.
the law provents this. In this case the max the guy could get was 6 months, and he got it.
Roger Lesboules
Ah ben tabarnak!
+316|6865|Abitibi-Temiscamingue. Québec!

Red Forman wrote:

I agree with bold boy.  Should have just locked him up overnight or something.
Even then...maybe just trow the guy out of the place on his face.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6939|USA
for a group of people that expect and demand that authority defend you and take care of you, you sure seem to think it does not deserve much respect. I guess entitlement does that to people.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6963|Canberra, AUS
This has nothing to do with entitlement and everything to do with a proportional response.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7004

lowing wrote:

for a group of people that expect and demand that authority defend you and take care of you, you sure seem to think it does not deserve much respect. I guess entitlement does that to people.
I thought you believed the Government should stay out of people's business.

So next time if you cough in court you get sent to the gulags?
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Stubbee
Religions Hate Facts, Questions and Doubts
+223|7031|Reality

Cybargs wrote:

lowing wrote:

for a group of people that expect and demand that authority defend you and take care of you, you sure seem to think it does not deserve much respect. I guess entitlement does that to people.
I thought you believed the Government should stay out of people's business.

So next time if you cough in court you get sent to the gulags?
yeah if it sounds like

co- bullshit -ugh

i think it is 4 months for rolling your eyes though
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6939|USA

Cybargs wrote:

lowing wrote:

for a group of people that expect and demand that authority defend you and take care of you, you sure seem to think it does not deserve much respect. I guess entitlement does that to people.
I thought you believed the Government should stay out of people's business.

So next time if you cough in court you get sent to the gulags?
He didn't "cough" in court, and he was being disrespectful and mocking, he got called on it.

Enforcing the laws and punishing criminals is not the same as staying out of peoples business. and to be honest it is a really stupid connection to make on your part.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6939|USA

Spark wrote:

This has nothing to do with entitlement and everything to do with a proportional response.
mocking the court, and contempt of court are serious actions. Ya kinda don't do it.
Bevo
Nah
+718|6809|Austin, Texas
send him to the slammer for the night. humiliated, done.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6939|USA

Bevo wrote:

send him to the slammer for the night. humiliated, done.
Well when you are a judge you can be as lenient as you wish. Personally I like a judge who is sick of fuckheads like this guy.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6441|what

lowing wrote:

Spark wrote:

This has nothing to do with entitlement and everything to do with a proportional response.
mocking the court, and contempt of court are serious actions. Ya kinda don't do it.
DUI is a serious action which can result in manslaughter.

Yawning hurts the judges pride.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6939|USA

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Spark wrote:

This has nothing to do with entitlement and everything to do with a proportional response.
mocking the court, and contempt of court are serious actions. Ya kinda don't do it.
DUI is a serious action which can result in manslaughter.

Yawning hurts the judges pride.
not sure what the connection is to DUI but I am forced to agree with you, it most certainly can result in manslaughter.

He was not yawning, he was being a smart ass, disruptive and disrespectful to the proceedings. I guess it boils down to difference of opinion as to how he should be punished. Since I like the outcome, and am pleased, I guess it is up to you to come to grips with it.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6963|Canberra, AUS
He was let go after 3 weeks.
I can bet that this isn't the end of it.

Is this the outcome you wanted?


People in other Will County courtrooms have received less severe sentences for seemingly more flagrant offenses. In Judge Richard Schoenstedt's court last year, a woman was disruptive during closing arguments of a trial; shouted, "This is bull ..." as she was led away; was held to the floor by a deputy; and "continued to be disruptive" after later being brought back before the judge. She received a 7-day sentence for contempt, records show.
Inconsistent rulings are bad rulings.

A Tribune review of a decade's worth of contempt-of-court charges reveals that Rozak jails people -- typically spectators whose cell phones go off or who scream or shout profanity during sentencing

Last edited by Spark (2009-08-15 21:21:47)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6939|USA

Spark wrote:

He was let go after 3 weeks.
I can bet that this isn't the end of it.

Is this the outcome you wanted?


People in other Will County courtrooms have received less severe sentences for seemingly more flagrant offenses. In Judge Richard Schoenstedt's court last year, a woman was disruptive during closing arguments of a trial; shouted, "This is bull ..." as she was led away; was held to the floor by a deputy; and "continued to be disruptive" after later being brought back before the judge. She received a 7-day sentence for contempt, records show.
Inconsistent rulings are bad rulings.

A Tribune review of a decade's worth of contempt-of-court charges reveals that Rozak jails people -- typically spectators whose cell phones go off or who scream or shout profanity during sentencing
I agree with that, they should be consistantly harsh.

If the law, the court and the proceedings are to be mocked and not respected,  what chance does it have to really be effective?
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6441|what

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:


mocking the court, and contempt of court are serious actions. Ya kinda don't do it.
DUI is a serious action which can result in manslaughter.

Yawning hurts the judges pride.
not sure what the connection is to DUI but I am forced to agree with you, it most certainly can result in manslaughter.

He was not yawning, he was being a smart ass, disruptive and disrespectful to the proceedings. I guess it boils down to difference of opinion as to how he should be punished. Since I like the outcome, and am pleased, I guess it is up to you to come to grips with it.
The connection to DUI, which was brought up earlier in this thread, is that the punishment for DUI isn't as severe as 6 months jail.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6937

Lowing, I'm not sure if you've ever not had enough sleep, but sometimes when you start yawning you can't stop. Now maybe this might seem disrespectful to the judge, but is a perfectly innocent thing, not deserving of any jail time. Regardless, this is in no way proportional to the 'crime', and I can't see how any sane person could defend this.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6939|USA

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:


DUI is a serious action which can result in manslaughter.

Yawning hurts the judges pride.
not sure what the connection is to DUI but I am forced to agree with you, it most certainly can result in manslaughter.

He was not yawning, he was being a smart ass, disruptive and disrespectful to the proceedings. I guess it boils down to difference of opinion as to how he should be punished. Since I like the outcome, and am pleased, I guess it is up to you to come to grips with it.
The connection to DUI, which was brought up earlier in this thread, is that the punishment for DUI isn't as severe as 6 months jail.
and I agreed, DUI is not punished severely enough.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6939|USA

ghettoperson wrote:

Lowing, I'm not sure if you've ever not had enough sleep, but sometimes when you start yawning you can't stop. Now maybe this might seem disrespectful to the judge, but is a perfectly innocent thing, not deserving of any jail time. Regardless, this is in no way proportional to the 'crime', and I can't see how any sane person could defend this.
Yup, I have gone without sleep, and yup I yawn. Now are you telling me that you can not yawn, without screaming and stretching your arms and making over exaggerated gestures, if you can not , then you might need to see a doctor, because I most certainly can. It has already been established this was not an innocent yawn. It was a smart ass, disrespectful, sarcastic purposeful distraction to the courtroom and the proceedings.

Believe me, I am sane, and I support the punishement.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6937

I read the full article again, and you're right, it does sound like it was done intentionally. Either way, whilst I appreciate that a court is a serious place, one night, two nights or a even a week is the sort of sentence you'd expect for disrupting the proceedings.

I think my opinion with regards to your sanity is fairly well known.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6939|USA

ghettoperson wrote:

I read the full article again, and you're right, it does sound like it was done intentionally. Either way, whilst I appreciate that a court is a serious place, one night, two nights or a even a week is the sort of sentence you'd expect for disrupting the proceedings.

I think my opinion with regards to your sanity is fairly well known.
Well apparently you can now expect 6 months for disreupting proceedings.

As to my sanity, I can only say, liberals thinking I am wrong or crazy is is the only justification I need to know I am right and sane.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard