Pages: 1

Topic closed

Poll

Best Assault Rifle [Round 1-1A]

Tn2228%28% - 40
M436a371%71% - 98
Total: 138
2009-08-12 20:00:28
Eagle
Togs8896 is my evil alter ego
+567|6848|New Hampshire, USA
The BF2s Arms Contract Contest! - Best Assault Rifle [Round 1-1A]

*note The sign-up thread is still open for submissions in other categories

This thread will remain open for votes for exactly 24 hours before being closed.  In the event of a tie, the thread will enter sudden death and stay open until one vote is cast for either entrant.

Thread closes 13 August 2009 23:00:00 EST [13 August 2009 23:00:00 EST]


TN22
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/14407/TN22%20Assault%20Rifle.jpg

TN22-M203 Grenadier (mod of TN22)
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/14407/TN22-M203%20Grenadier.jpg

TN22K Carbine SOPMOD (mod of TN22)
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/14407/TN22K%20Carbine%20SOPMOD.jpg





M436A3
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/34941/M436A3%20Naked.jpg

M436A3 SOPMOD (mod of MA36A3)
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/34941/M436A3%20SOPMOD.jpg
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/14407/Sig_Pats.jpg
2009-08-12 20:16:08
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5803

Though choice because I didn't like neither but had to go with M436A3.
2009-08-13 00:06:48
SplinterStrike
Roamer
+250|6628|Eskimo land. AKA Canada.
I liked the M436A3 better.

Seems like the rail on the TN22 would force me to place my head lower on the rifle.
2009-08-13 02:26:48
Ty
Mass Media Casualty
+2,398|6992|Noizyland

I could see the Tn22 being a laser type weapon. Either way I don't think it is ergonomic - with the stock being in a direct line with the sights you'd have to life it too high and loose a lot of control as it qwouldn't be comfortably resting on your shoulder. This is a pretty crucial flaw with a fully automatic assault weapon.

Edit: Bah, doesn't matter I hit the wrong votey-thingy anyways.

Last edited by Ty (2009-08-13 02:27:40)

[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
2009-08-13 07:02:36
Lai
Member
+186|6368
I would have gone for the bullpup as the design is far more original and innovative. However, the stock is placed too high, relative to the pistol grip, to be pressed against the shoulder and no matter what round you'll chamber it for, that awkward mag angle is going to cause feed jams. Hence I consider the first entry disqualified as it cannot actually be used and will have to vote for the M436A3.
2009-08-13 10:00:40
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7060|Alberta, Canada

The first one because the M436 looks too complicated to use. I prefer a nice simple weapon.
2009-08-13 10:17:03
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6931|Purplicious Wisconsin

Ryan wrote:

The first one because the M436 looks too complicated to use. I prefer a nice simple weapon.
I guess the m16/m4 is too complex for you too.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
2009-08-13 10:35:22
Ioan92
Member
+337|5940

War Man wrote:

Ryan wrote:

The first one because the M436 looks too complicated to use. I prefer a nice simple weapon.
I guess the m16/m4 is too complex for you too.
I really can't help myself but laugh at this.
2009-08-13 10:51:34
mafia996630
© 2009 Jeff Minard
+319|6981|d
I don't like that second one as it looks 2 much like the guns medics have in bf2, um gc36 something .
2009-08-13 10:52:49
Roger Lesboules
Ah ben tabarnak!
+316|6794|Abitibi-Temiscamingue. Québec!
I am not a big fan of the bullpup...And overall the M436A3 look better.
2009-08-13 13:01:52
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6671|The Twilight Zone
M4
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
2009-08-13 13:49:38
RAIMIUS
You with the face!
+244|6932|US
The bullpup design looks too heavy...
2009-08-13 17:15:09
Noobpatty
ʎʇʇɐdqoou
+194|6571|West NY
I'd vote for the TN22 if the iron sights weren't so low...you'd have to shove the gun in your face to line them up.

Topic closed

Pages: 1

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard