Water is also bad for you, it's common knowledge that you can die from drinking too much.Spark wrote:
Because I don't care about the other stuff, I care about the woefully uninformed assertions on fluoridated water (by the way the "communist plot" thing is over 50 years old)SonderKommando wrote:
I'm on my 2g iphone w/ outdated software so I cannot post links. Besides fluoride you didnt even touch the other examples I gave and those were just scratching the surface. I'm just saying the super class of the world are into some very esoteric stuff. I want to know why.
There's a lot of stuff that is "bad for us" ONLY in excess - copper, selenium, zinc, even, maybe (MAYBE) arsenic. Fluorine is definitely one of those.
A debate over fluoridation regarding medical ethics and whether tooth decay should be treated involuntarily, without the public's express choice, is one thing, but saying "Fluoridated water is bad for you!" is quite another.
I have a tin foil hat and I prefer flouridated water as I don't like having my teeth drilled.
Well considering the future these globalists want for you, you should care.Spark wrote:
Because I don't care about the other stuff, I care about the woefully uninformed assertions on fluoridated water (by the way the "communist plot" thing is over 50 years old)SonderKommando wrote:
I'm on my 2g iphone w/ outdated software so I cannot post links. Besides fluoride you didnt even touch the other examples I gave and those were just scratching the surface. I'm just saying the super class of the world are into some very esoteric stuff. I want to know why.
There's a lot of stuff that is "bad for us" ONLY in excess - copper, selenium, zinc, even, maybe (MAYBE) arsenic. Fluorine is definitely one of those.
A debate over fluoridation regarding medical ethics and whether tooth decay should be treated involuntarily, without the public's express choice, is one thing, but saying "Fluoridated water is bad for you!" is quite another.
I know nothing about them and I'm not fool enough to make an uniformed opinion on it, hence, \_/.SonderKommando wrote:
Well considering the future these globalists want for you, you should care.Spark wrote:
Because I don't care about the other stuff, I care about the woefully uninformed assertions on fluoridated water (by the way the "communist plot" thing is over 50 years old)SonderKommando wrote:
I'm on my 2g iphone w/ outdated software so I cannot post links. Besides fluoride you didnt even touch the other examples I gave and those were just scratching the surface. I'm just saying the super class of the world are into some very esoteric stuff. I want to know why.
There's a lot of stuff that is "bad for us" ONLY in excess - copper, selenium, zinc, even, maybe (MAYBE) arsenic. Fluorine is definitely one of those.
A debate over fluoridation regarding medical ethics and whether tooth decay should be treated involuntarily, without the public's express choice, is one thing, but saying "Fluoridated water is bad for you!" is quite another.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
If I may ask, why do so many see Globalisation as a worldwide conspiracy? While many of these TNC's need a headkick (Exxon is paticularly bad, compare the treatment they got after Valdez to the treatment the Pasher Bulker people got from QLD just this week), many of us would certainly be the worse off for it.ATG wrote:
http://www.bilderberggroup.net/
Good starting point Sparky.
EDIT: Currently reading http://wikileaks.org/leak/bilderberg-me … t-1980.pdf - if it is accurate, then it's hard to see this being more than a forum. One thing I have noticed - no names, only "An American" or "A Frenchman".
They certainly don't seem to be talking about world domination. I'm currently reading through the section on oil, which sounds perfectly reasonable - all about reducing dependence (this is 30 years ago and they mention alternative energy - nice to see it's at least being thought about - no mention of global warming which makes sense, far too early to notice it then)
An excerpt, italics mine.
Beyond this, we needed alternative energy sources and improved productivity precisely. Huge investments would be acquired to achieve these goals duh, and they should be financed in as non-inflationary a manner as possible I suppose that's elite-talk for "it has to be economically sound". This meant that our consumption-oriented economy of the past had to give way to an economy that put greater stress on savings and productivity ABSOLUTELY.
Last edited by Spark (2009-08-09 22:35:42)
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Personally I think removing national sovereignty is a good thing.
No countries, no wars.
No countries, no wars.
Last edited by Doctor Strangelove (2009-08-09 23:18:38)
Globalization has nothing to do with removing sovereignty... unless certain people are using it as a cover to do it.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Personally I think removing national sovereignty is a good thing.
No countries, no wars.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman