lowing
Banned
+1,662|6917|USA
http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/08/03/massac … index.html


All of this BULLSHIT, and political maneuvering, and all Gates had to do was apologize for his behavior and his accusations and try harder in the future to keep his racism in check. I guarntee the last thing this guy will do now is file a law suit and make his exposed racism a matter of public record.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6418|what

Still, Gates said he doesn't want to exaggerate the trauma of the arrest. "A lot of people go through far worse. I was in jail for four hours, not four years or four months or four days," he said.
Yeah he's a real monster lowing. And imagine, he is teaching young kids, brainwashing them as we speak! zomg
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6763

this thread is still open? i thought all the parties involved, well, partied, everyone got along famously, and lived happily after.

[img]deadhorse[/img]
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6917|USA

AussieReaper wrote:

Still, Gates said he doesn't want to exaggerate the trauma of the arrest. "A lot of people go through far worse. I was in jail for four hours, not four years or four months or four days," he said.
Yeah he's a real monster lowing. And imagine, he is teaching young kids, brainwashing them as we speak! zomg
He does not want to exaggerate his arrest?,.......Little late for that isn't Aussie?
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6917|USA

burnzz wrote:

this thread is still open? i thought all the parties involved, well, partied, everyone got along famously, and lived happily after.

deadhorse
Please, by all means, feel ABSOLUTELY FREE, to ignore this thread
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6418|what

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Still, Gates said he doesn't want to exaggerate the trauma of the arrest. "A lot of people go through far worse. I was in jail for four hours, not four years or four months or four days," he said.
Yeah he's a real monster lowing. And imagine, he is teaching young kids, brainwashing them as we speak! zomg
He does not want to exaggerate his arrest?,.......Little late for that isn't Aussie?
What? If he wanted to exaggerate his arrest, he could always file for law suit...

Which you said one post ago that's the last thing you expect him to do. lol

So he is not exaggerating his arrest by filing suit. See how that works?
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6917|USA

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:


Yeah he's a real monster lowing. And imagine, he is teaching young kids, brainwashing them as we speak! zomg
He does not want to exaggerate his arrest?,.......Little late for that isn't Aussie?
What? If he wanted to exaggerate his arrest, he could always file for law suit...

Which you said one post ago that's the last thing you expect him to do. lol

So he is not exaggerating his arrest by filing suit. See how that works?
There are a lot of people that would love to see him file a law suit. He knows better, and so does all of the other race baiters that remain in the woodwork since the integrity of the cop has been established.

He screamed a law suit as well as producing a documentary regarding the racism behind his arrest. Not to mention national exposure with presidential intervention I know you don't, but I would call that exaggerated.
nukchebi0
Пушкин, наше всё
+387|6589|New Haven, CT

Turquoise wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Pretty much...  although they usually have to pause first when I show them that William Julius Wilson (a black sociologist) supports the changing of affirmative action to reflect class not race.

We should be helping the poor regardless of race.
I never heard that a prominent African-American actually argued against affirmative action (seven 'A' words, lel). How do your opponents respond, aside from pausing, when they hear you mention it?

And exactly. I agree with you wholeheartedly.
Well, I think I may have changed the minds of some of them, especially when I explain that by making this change, poor blacks would still receive help.  It would just remove rich and middle class blacks from the program, because they don't need the help.
Interesting; its something to be remembered next time I wade into the horror that is that argument.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6898|949

nukchebi0 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:


I never heard that a prominent African-American actually argued against affirmative action (seven 'A' words, lel). How do your opponents respond, aside from pausing, when they hear you mention it?

And exactly. I agree with you wholeheartedly.
Well, I think I may have changed the minds of some of them, especially when I explain that by making this change, poor blacks would still receive help.  It would just remove rich and middle class blacks from the program, because they don't need the help.
Interesting; its something to be remembered next time I wade into the horror that is that argument.
But if you look at statistics, middle and upper class blacks still ARE discriminated against.  It's the along the same reason the NFL had to institute the policy that at least 1 black candidate has to be interviewed for a vacant head-coaching position; it's because so many institutions and industries are discriminatory.  Perhaps simply from an educational standpoint we should have a class-based system of positive action, but for employment/economy there are very obvious discriminations.  If we don't to take action against the discriminator we must take action for the group being discriminated against.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6917|USA

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Well, I think I may have changed the minds of some of them, especially when I explain that by making this change, poor blacks would still receive help.  It would just remove rich and middle class blacks from the program, because they don't need the help.
Interesting; its something to be remembered next time I wade into the horror that is that argument.
But if you look at statistics, middle and upper class blacks still ARE discriminated against.  It's the along the same reason the NFL had to institute the policy that at least 1 black candidate has to be interviewed for a vacant head-coaching position; it's because so many institutions and industries are discriminatory.  Perhaps simply from an educational standpoint we should have a class-based system of positive action, but for employment/economy there are very obvious discriminations.  If we don't to take action against the discriminator we must take action for the group being discriminated against.
and how are black middle and upper class people discriminated against exactly.
Bevo
Nah
+718|6786|Austin, Texas
If the officer was black and had repeated the same actions, would he still cry racist?

Sickening, all of it.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6671|North Carolina

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Well, I think I may have changed the minds of some of them, especially when I explain that by making this change, poor blacks would still receive help.  It would just remove rich and middle class blacks from the program, because they don't need the help.
Interesting; its something to be remembered next time I wade into the horror that is that argument.
But if you look at statistics, middle and upper class blacks still ARE discriminated against.  It's the along the same reason the NFL had to institute the policy that at least 1 black candidate has to be interviewed for a vacant head-coaching position; it's because so many institutions and industries are discriminatory.  Perhaps simply from an educational standpoint we should have a class-based system of positive action, but for employment/economy there are very obvious discriminations.  If we don't to take action against the discriminator we must take action for the group being discriminated against.
Oh give me a break.  So it's not enough that most of the players are black?  Why don't we just go back to the Negro Leagues?  Have all black teams and have all black coaches while we're at it.

The number of blacks per institution does not indicate racism.  The only reason the NFL HAD to do that is because people assume it's racism.  It's not.

Think about it.  If the NBA became nearly all black in players, would they institute a required percentage of white players?

While we're at it, why isn't there a mandatory Latino, Native American, or Asian candidate for coaches?

It seems that this has more to do with certain activist groups bitching about shit than any real racism.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6898|949

It's not that percentages weren't high enough - it's that owners weren't hiring (or even interviewing) black candidates.  The owners were discriminating based on race.  It's a sad fact of life, but it's there nonetheless.  The policy doesn't say that owners have to hire a certain amount of black coaches, just that they must interview at least one black candidate.  I've never read any studies or seen any academic evidence that black people are less intelligent in coaching football, so in a sport where the overwhelming majority of those involved are black, why is there a deficit of black coaches?

My example was to show that your (and perhaps Wilson's) argument that affirmative action should be class-based is not a great solution.  There is discrimination at all levels of society, and it's not only based on poor vs. rich.  Affirmative action is a shitty reality that came to fruitiion because there is still discrimination almost 50 years after the Civil Rights Act passed, 150 years after the Civil War.  It's pathetic, but it's a reality.

I don't agree with accepting students strictly based on census statistics, I don't agree with the idea that there needs to be a complete cross-section of America represented in every industry and/or sector of society.  I don't want our society to have to create legislation to battle some people's own prejudice.  Unfortunately the world isn't my utopian fantasy.

Lowing - middle and upper class blacks are passed up on raises and promotions.  They get paid less than their white counterparts.  Look at any economics statistic rating the average salaries of black people against white people in similar positions of employment with similar qualifications and education.  Black people (on average) get paid less.  So do women.  That is discrimination.  Spin it how you want, that's the facts.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6917|USA

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

It's not that percentages weren't high enough - it's that owners weren't hiring (or even interviewing) black candidates.  The owners were discriminating based on race.  It's a sad fact of life, but it's there nonetheless.  The policy doesn't say that owners have to hire a certain amount of black coaches, just that they must interview at least one black candidate.  I've never read any studies or seen any academic evidence that black people are less intelligent in coaching football, so in a sport where the overwhelming majority of those involved are black, why is there a deficit of black coaches?

My example was to show that your (and perhaps Wilson's) argument that affirmative action should be class-based is not a great solution.  There is discrimination at all levels of society, and it's not only based on poor vs. rich.  Affirmative action is a shitty reality that came to fruitiion because there is still discrimination almost 50 years after the Civil Rights Act passed, 150 years after the Civil War.  It's pathetic, but it's a reality.

I don't agree with accepting students strictly based on census statistics, I don't agree with the idea that there needs to be a complete cross-section of America represented in every industry and/or sector of society.  I don't want our society to have to create legislation to battle some people's own prejudice.  Unfortunately the world isn't my utopian fantasy.

Lowing - middle and upper class blacks are passed up on raises and promotions.  They get paid less than their white counterparts.  Look at any economics statistic rating the average salaries of black people against white people in similar positions of employment with similar qualifications and education.  Black people (on average) get paid less.  So do women.  That is discrimination.  Spin it how you want, that's the facts.
The very fact that middle and upper class black people are middle and upper class, would suggest they are NOT being passed up. Cuz, if that is your argument, then I will come back and say, based on that conclusion, that white middle and upper class people MUST also be getting passed up as well.

As to rest, just don't tell me, show me, for example that a black doctor gets paid less thana white one, a black airline pilot gets paid less than a white one, a black educator gets paid less than a white one, or a black cop gets paid less than a white one.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6898|949

Find one yourself.  You have a computer, internet and google.  Learn to be resourceful.  You can find all the articles you need on your Islam diatribes so I know you are more than capable.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6917|USA

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Read a freaking economics study.  You have a computer, internet and google.  Learn to be resourceful.
You mean the study will show a black doctor in a hospital makes less because he is black? A black airline pilots makes less because he is black?

It is your claim you provide the links, kinda the way it works 'round here. I am not inclined to do your research.

Last edited by lowing (2009-08-04 09:59:42)

KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6898|949

lowing wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Read a freaking economics study.  You have a computer, internet and google.  Learn to be resourceful.
You mean the study will show a black doctor in a hospital makes less because he is black? A black airline pilots makes less because he is black?

It is your claim you provide the links, kinda the way it works 'round here. I am not inclined to do your research.
And it's your claim that they aren't discriminated against.  Why don't you show me it's not true?  I don't care, I'm at work I'm not going to google and post links.  Maybe after work if I feel like revisiting this subject I will.  In the meantime, seek it out yourself or believe what you want.  I really don't care.
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6647|the land of bourbon

Turquoise wrote:

The number of blacks per institution does not indicate racism.  The only reason the NFL HAD to do that is because people assume it's racism.  It's not.

Think about it.  If the NBA became nearly all black in players, would they institute a required percentage of white players?

While we're at it, why isn't there a mandatory Latino, Native American, or Asian candidate for coaches?

It seems that this has more to do with certain activist groups bitching about shit than any real racism.
good point +1
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6917|USA

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

lowing wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Read a freaking economics study.  You have a computer, internet and google.  Learn to be resourceful.
You mean the study will show a black doctor in a hospital makes less because he is black? A black airline pilots makes less because he is black?

It is your claim you provide the links, kinda the way it works 'round here. I am not inclined to do your research.
And it's your claim that they aren't discriminated against.  Why don't you show me it's not true?  I don't care, I'm at work I'm not going to google and post links.  Maybe after work if I feel like revisiting this subject I will.  In the meantime, seek it out yourself or believe what you want.  I really don't care.
Never said they were not. I said the fact thwy achieved a higher status would suggest they are not discriminated against. I said based on your argument, white people who only achieve middle and upper class status are also discriminated against.

YOU are the one making these claims, I ask for proof. So when and if you decide to visit this topic again. ( I think that will depend on what you find) I will be looking for proof that a black airline pilot makes less than a white one because he is black, and a black educator makes less because he is black, and a black doctor makes less because he is black.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6898|949

Lowing it's not about me "finding" evidence to support my position..the evidence is already there.  I've read the statistics, read the studies, read the sociology books.  What have you read?  It's about me caring enough about this (or to prove you wrong) to actually source the material I've read.  It seems certain to me that you haven't read much on the subject and are pounding out emotive responses.

The studies don't show that "this person makes less because he is black" because well, for an employer to admit that would be racism.  What the studies do show is that blacks and women make less on average than their white counterparts, even when factoring in schooling and job experience.  If when I get home I can be bothered, perhaps I will open up one of the books I've read and link you to some source material.  I'm not going to troll the internet looking for the one bizarro link that backs up my claim.  Not my style.
Stubbee
Religions Hate Facts, Questions and Doubts
+223|7009|Reality
since my last post was too subtle (ATG's train derailment pic thx AWM) I must ask what most of the posts on this page have to do with the 'racist arrest'? open an affirmative action thread somewhere and debate it because it has no relevance to the OP.

The story is really over. The prof. goofed and over-reacted. The officer could have handled it differently but I don't think it could have been handled better. POTUS #44 discovered the pitfalls of foot-in-mouth disease but his people handled the situation beautifully. Beer summit! Brilliant.

Last edited by Stubbee (2009-08-04 12:41:51)

The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6917|USA

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Lowing it's not about me "finding" evidence to support my position..the evidence is already there.  I've read the statistics, read the studies, read the sociology books.  What have you read?  It's about me caring enough about this (or to prove you wrong) to actually source the material I've read.  It seems certain to me that you haven't read much on the subject and are pounding out emotive responses.

The studies don't show that "this person makes less because he is black" because well, for an employer to admit that would be racism.  What the studies do show is that blacks and women make less on average than their white counterparts, even when factoring in schooling and job experience.  If when I get home I can be bothered, perhaps I will open up one of the books I've read and link you to some source material.  I'm not going to troll the internet looking for the one bizarro link that backs up my claim.  Not my style.
I see, so you have no evidence that blacks make less because they are black, ( your conclusion). Perhaps they make less because they are in less paying jobs?


I want an apples to apples comparison. Airline pilot to airline pilot, same airline same seniority, same aircraft. Show me where a black pilot makes less than his counterpart when everything else is the same.

I am asking you to compare middle and upper class jobs where white people make more, doctors, lawyers, airline pilots, cops, firefighters etc....this is your claim, so back it up or shut it up.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6671|North Carolina

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

It's not that percentages weren't high enough - it's that owners weren't hiring (or even interviewing) black candidates.  The owners were discriminating based on race.  It's a sad fact of life, but it's there nonetheless.  The policy doesn't say that owners have to hire a certain amount of black coaches, just that they must interview at least one black candidate.  I've never read any studies or seen any academic evidence that black people are less intelligent in coaching football, so in a sport where the overwhelming majority of those involved are black, why is there a deficit of black coaches?
Why not ask them personally?  Considering that a few years ago the Super Bowl had 2 teams with black head coaches and this year's champs (The Steelers) have a black head coach as well, I don't see a lack of black coaches.

Careers have a beginning and an end just like a product on the market.  People that offer a service have to have certain requirements.  To be a player, you only have to be young and talented.  To be a coach, you have to have experience.  Considering that whites only leagues predate black leagues, there is naturally going to be more white coaches for a while.  As time goes by, some of these black players of today will later become coaches.  Since there are more black players right now than whites, it is safe to assume that eventually there will be more black coaches than white ones.  Would you support quotas for interviewing white coaches in the future if this comes to pass?

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

My example was to show that your (and perhaps Wilson's) argument that affirmative action should be class-based is not a great solution.  There is discrimination at all levels of society, and it's not only based on poor vs. rich.  Affirmative action is a shitty reality that came to fruitiion because there is still discrimination almost 50 years after the Civil Rights Act passed, 150 years after the Civil War.  It's pathetic, but it's a reality.
Do you think an institution that lends itself to assuming minorities can't cut it without help is helping end discrimination?

Given what I mentioned earlier about the Super Bowl, do you really think most people will refuse to hire black coaches in football over their race?  If 2 black coaches succeeded recently in taking teams all the way to league titles, I think it should be clear to any management with half a brain that race doesn't matter.  And for the few managers that don't realize this yet, I'm not sure if a black coach would want to work for them.

For the jobs that matter, managers care about performance.  Any business that plans on sticking around will hire who they perceive as best for the job.   Now, admittedly, this may not apply as much to lower level jobs, but even so, I can say from personal experience that people in my city certainly don't have a problem with hiring black people, whether it's fast food or running a large company.

And I seriously doubt all of these people wouldn't have been hired without affirmative action.  The few people who believe that probably are racist anyway.

Oh yeah, and here's another glaring inequality with affirmative action.  If I were black and moved to any lily-white city of a decent size, I'd automatically have a leg up on my white competition for a job as long as my qualifications were on par with theirs (and sometimes not even on par).

As a white person, I can't go to Detroit, Oakland, Baltimore, or Atlanta and automatically have an advantage based on my race in getting hired.

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Lowing - middle and upper class blacks are passed up on raises and promotions.  They get paid less than their white counterparts.  Look at any economics statistic rating the average salaries of black people against white people in similar positions of employment with similar qualifications and education.  Black people (on average) get paid less.  So do women.  That is discrimination.  Spin it how you want, that's the facts.
That's because they accept lower pay oftentimes.  If they didn't, it wouldn't happen as much.

Last edited by Turquoise (2009-08-04 19:57:57)

FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6766|so randum
i think its pretty cool your head honcho chills out with a beer and a smoke. our commander in chief is a boring dour bastard
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6763

FatherTed wrote:

i think its pretty cool your head honcho chills out with a beer and a smoke. our commander in chief is a boring dour bastard
and that entirely describes the Republican/Democrat dynamic here in the U.S.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard