Pages: 1 2

 

2009-07-30 23:39:08
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5875

A second bomb in two days attributed to the Basque separatist group Eta rocked the popular holiday destination of Majorca yesterday, killing two policemen after it detonated in one of the island's main tourist resorts.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world … 65356.html
So ETA wants a Basque region separate from Spain and France in the small area between the two countries. If it wasn't for them blowing shit up would you think they would have a case to make their own state there or do you think Spain and France have a right to rule over these people?
2009-07-30 23:40:00
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6964|Canberra, AUS
ETA? I thought they gave up aaages ago.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
2009-07-30 23:42:18
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5875

They did then they started back up if I understand correctly, modern Euro politics isn't my forte, so ask a Frenchmen since there are like no Spaniards here.
2009-07-30 23:49:19
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6442|what

Macbeth wrote:

They did then they started back up if I understand correctly, modern Euro politics isn't my forte, so ask a Frenchmen since there are like no Spaniards here.
True, but we have too many French Canadians, tbh. (lol)


I'm glad the attack wasn't as devastating as most terrorist bombings are. I can't understand how any group could think killing people in such a way is going to gain them much support though.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
2009-07-31 15:25:20
gunmedown
Member
+5|6712|Hernani, Guipuzcoa

Macbeth wrote:

A second bomb in two days attributed to the Basque separatist group Eta rocked the popular holiday destination of Majorca yesterday, killing two policemen after it detonated in one of the island's main tourist resorts.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world … 65356.html
So ETA wants a Basque region separate from Spain and France in the small area between the two countries. If it wasn't for them blowing shit up would you think they would have a case to make their own state there or do you think Spain and France have a right to rule over these people?
well being as the Basques were there first i would think so. Spain and France have no right to rule over them, all France and Spain did was rob the country from the Basque people. Why? well because Basque Country has most the industry of Spain (most the the iron that was imported into Britain before ww2 was from Basque Country) the Romans done it first the French and the Spanish were next.

Last edited by gunmedown (2009-07-31 15:36:13)

2009-07-31 15:32:32
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6910|London, England
If the Basques really wanted independence (and not just a fringe terror group/ETA) they could easily organise and do it the non violent way, especially in these uber liberal EU days where any sort of serious violent crackdown on peaceful protestors/independence peoples by an EU country would be seen as ""

Basically in these days it's more down to the Basques themselves in their determination to achieve independence than France or Spain being ruthless occupiers of land and oppressors.
2009-07-31 15:33:20
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6939

Given that ETA's political wing just lost the Basque election, it sounds like the terrorists don't exactly have a leg to stand on.
2009-07-31 15:36:12
Red Forman
Banned
+402|5690
Well I guess Spain capitulating to the terroists after 3/11 has not worked.
2009-07-31 15:40:29
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6845

Red Forman wrote:

Well I guess Spain capitulating to the terroists after 3/11 has not worked.
lol. That was Al Qaeda, not ETA. Capitulation? lol. Keep pounding mud huts in the ass end of a country where diarrhoea is a pastime for all the good it'll do you, if you really think that it is preventing or curbing terrorism against the US....
2009-07-31 15:41:33
Red Forman
Banned
+402|5690

CameronPoe wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

Well I guess Spain capitulating to the terroists after 3/11 has not worked.
lol. That was Al Qaeda, not ETA. Capitulation? lol. Keep pounding mud huts in the ass end of a country where diarrhoea is a pastime for all the good it'll do you, if you really think that it is preventing or curbing terrorism against the US....
Yes I know that was Al-Q.  Doesn't matter.
2009-07-31 15:43:23
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6845

Red Forman wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

Well I guess Spain capitulating to the terroists after 3/11 has not worked.
lol. That was Al Qaeda, not ETA. Capitulation? lol. Keep pounding mud huts in the ass end of a country where diarrhoea is a pastime for all the good it'll do you, if you really think that it is preventing or curbing terrorism against the US....
Yes I know that was Al-Q.  Doesn't matter.
Yes it fucking does. And they never capitulated - they continually make arrests, carry out counter-intel, monitor borders, try terrorists and jail them, etc. - you know, real counter-terrorism.
2009-07-31 15:44:06
Red Forman
Banned
+402|5690
Ok.  I see you are angry and feel like being a smart ass.  Good day.
2009-07-31 15:45:29
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6939

Racial profiling is more fun, Cam.

BTW, are you a bit too young to have been harassed by British airport security 15 years or so when visiting the UK?
2009-07-31 15:49:57
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6910|London, England

Red Forman wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

Well I guess Spain capitulating to the terroists after 3/11 has not worked.
lol. That was Al Qaeda, not ETA. Capitulation? lol. Keep pounding mud huts in the ass end of a country where diarrhoea is a pastime for all the good it'll do you, if you really think that it is preventing or curbing terrorism against the US....
Yes I know that was Al-Q.  Doesn't matter.
Yeah it does, they may have capitulated to AQ in the eyes of some by pulling out of Iraq after Madrid was bombed by AQ, but it doesn't really have much to do with ETA's campaign which was there long before the whole War on Terrorism/Islamic Terrorists even started.

Even then, they didn't really capitulate to AQ. I thought the general definition of losing/capitulating to AQ is to let them take over your country and introduce Sharia law because they hate the West/Freedom.

They just fucked off realising Iraq is not their war (and never was) and they shouldn't bother fighting so far away for something that's only ever going to bring more harm to Spain than do good. Sounds reasonable to me.
2009-07-31 15:53:49
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6695|North Carolina

Red Forman wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

Well I guess Spain capitulating to the terroists after 3/11 has not worked.
lol. That was Al Qaeda, not ETA. Capitulation? lol. Keep pounding mud huts in the ass end of a country where diarrhoea is a pastime for all the good it'll do you, if you really think that it is preventing or curbing terrorism against the US....
Yes I know that was Al-Q.  Doesn't matter.
Wow...  just wow....
2009-07-31 15:54:37
Red Forman
Banned
+402|5690

Turquoise wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


lol. That was Al Qaeda, not ETA. Capitulation? lol. Keep pounding mud huts in the ass end of a country where diarrhoea is a pastime for all the good it'll do you, if you really think that it is preventing or curbing terrorism against the US....
Yes I know that was Al-Q.  Doesn't matter.
Wow...  just wow....
Beg your pardon.
2009-07-31 15:56:09
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6695|North Carolina

Red Forman wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Red Forman wrote:


Yes I know that was Al-Q.  Doesn't matter.
Wow...  just wow....
Beg your pardon.
You do realize the ETA involves a cultural minority in Spain, while Al Quida is a foreign terror group.

Spain's actions with reference to the Iraq War really have no relevance to how the ETA operates.

I was just surprised you seemed to miss that.
2009-07-31 15:57:30
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5875

Turquoise wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Wow...  just wow....
Beg your pardon.
You do realize the ETA involves a cultural minority in Spain, while Al Quida is a foreign terror group.

Spain's actions with reference to the Iraq War really have no relevance to how the ETA operates.

I was just surprised you seemed to miss that.
Semantics are hard. lol
2009-07-31 15:57:40
Red Forman
Banned
+402|5690

Turquoise wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Wow...  just wow....
Beg your pardon.
You do realize the ETA involves a cultural minority in Spain, while Al Quida is a foreign terror group.

Spain's actions with reference to the Iraq War really have no relevance to how the ETA operates.

I was just surprised you seemed to miss that.
I know the difference sir.  But, I do not see how you think Spain giving in to Al-Q's demands doesn't resonate with other groups.
2009-07-31 15:59:55
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6695|North Carolina

Red Forman wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Red Forman wrote:


Beg your pardon.
You do realize the ETA involves a cultural minority in Spain, while Al Quida is a foreign terror group.

Spain's actions with reference to the Iraq War really have no relevance to how the ETA operates.

I was just surprised you seemed to miss that.
I know the difference sir.  But, I do not see how you think Spain giving in to Al-Q's demands doesn't resonate with other groups.
...because the motivation is entirely different.  ETA has been a longstanding problem for Spain.  Al Quida is a peripheral issue for Spain.

For example, Al Quida doesn't have a strong presence in Spain, while ETA does.  Al Quida mostly just wants the West out of the Middle East, while ETA wants to carve out a separate country from Spain.

The 2 groups might be terrorists, but that's about all they have in common.
2009-07-31 16:08:01
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6845

Red Forman wrote:

I know the difference sir.  But, I do not see how you think Spain giving in to Al-Q's demands doesn't resonate with other groups.
lol. ETA have been doing this for DECADES. They don't give a fuck one way or the other what the Spaniards think of them. Did they stop when Spain sent troops to Iraq? No they fucking didn't. QED. Sheesh.

Have a gander:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ETA_attacks

Last edited by CameronPoe (2009-07-31 16:10:40)

2009-07-31 16:10:19
Red Forman
Banned
+402|5690

CameronPoe wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

I know the difference sir.  But, I do not see how you think Spain giving in to Al-Q's demands doesn't resonate with other groups.
lol. ETA have been doing this for DECADES. They don't give a fuck one way or the other what the Spaniards think of them. Did they stop when Spain sent troops to Iraq? No they fucking didn't. QED. Sheesh.
Ok.  That is a fair point.

But, what if they said FU to Al-Q and cracked down on ETA?  I mean, why not do that?

Last edited by Red Forman (2009-07-31 16:20:11)

2009-07-31 16:35:25
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6845

Red Forman wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

I know the difference sir.  But, I do not see how you think Spain giving in to Al-Q's demands doesn't resonate with other groups.
lol. ETA have been doing this for DECADES. They don't give a fuck one way or the other what the Spaniards think of them. Did they stop when Spain sent troops to Iraq? No they fucking didn't. QED. Sheesh.
Ok.  That is a fair point.

But, what if they said FU to Al-Q and cracked down on ETA?  I mean, why not do that?
They did say FU to Al-Q, they sent troops to Afghanistan - for all the good that did. Iraq didn't have anything whatsoever to do with Al Qaeda - it was an unnecessary destabilising western hitjob on an important nation for strategic reasons.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2009-07-31 16:36:55)

2009-08-01 01:54:16
Red Forman
Banned
+402|5690

CameronPoe wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


lol. ETA have been doing this for DECADES. They don't give a fuck one way or the other what the Spaniards think of them. Did they stop when Spain sent troops to Iraq? No they fucking didn't. QED. Sheesh.
Ok.  That is a fair point.

But, what if they said FU to Al-Q and cracked down on ETA?  I mean, why not do that?
They did say FU to Al-Q, they sent troops to Afghanistan - for all the good that did. Iraq didn't have anything whatsoever to do with Al Qaeda - it was an unnecessary destabilising western hitjob on an important nation for strategic reasons.
Can you possibly just talk about the subject without all these stupid little quips and stuff?  My god dude you have issues or something.
2009-08-01 05:16:27
PureFodder
Member
+225|6575

Red Forman wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Red Forman wrote:


Ok.  That is a fair point.

But, what if they said FU to Al-Q and cracked down on ETA?  I mean, why not do that?
They did say FU to Al-Q, they sent troops to Afghanistan - for all the good that did. Iraq didn't have anything whatsoever to do with Al Qaeda - it was an unnecessary destabilising western hitjob on an important nation for strategic reasons.
Can you possibly just talk about the subject without all these stupid little quips and stuff?  My god dude you have issues or something.
That would have sounded better if you hadn't added a stupid little quip at the end.

 

Pages: 1 2

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard