Hey do what you want, but dont do it around me.
No. Yes. No.MrMagoo wrote:
Do you support it? Does it disgust you? Are you gay?
That said, the best boss I ever had was gay. You wouldn't know it if someone didn't tell you because he didn't see any need to be flamboyant. Very cool guy and was considerate enough to not act in ways that would make others feel uncomfortable. Guess that's my biggest issue. Wanna be gay? Aright then, keep your sexuality behind closed doors like all other well adjusted adults. No one else is having a parade because of how they prefer to get their sex on ...
Don't care until the "Marriage" word come into play... "civil unions?" I don't give a f.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Dont care, even about the marriage thing, but really flamboyant people annoy the shit out of me.
Heterosexuals have done a fine job destroying that word.. I wouldn't wish that hell on anyone.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Don't care until the "Marriage" word come into play... "civil unions?" I don't give a f.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Relevant
![https://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/b/b7/Differencechriscrocker.jpeg](https://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/b/b7/Differencechriscrocker.jpeg)
Which word? "marriage" or "civil union">?Kmarion wrote:
Heterosexuals have done a fine job destroying that word.. I wouldn't wish that hell on anyone.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Don't care until the "Marriage" word come into play... "civil unions?" I don't give a f.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
marriageDBBrinson1 wrote:
Which word? "marriage" or "civil union">?Kmarion wrote:
Heterosexuals have done a fine job destroying that word.. I wouldn't wish that hell on anyone.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Don't care until the "Marriage" word come into play... "civil unions?" I don't give a f.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Wait.. Marriage is hell to you?Kmarion wrote:
marriageDBBrinson1 wrote:
Which word? "marriage" or "civil union">?Kmarion wrote:
Heterosexuals have done a fine job destroying that word.. I wouldn't wish that hell on anyone.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
I'm just saying this "cherished" word is a laugh.. what are we batting 50-50 now? Hetero's have wiped their ass with that word.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Wait.. Marriage is hell to you?Kmarion wrote:
marriageDBBrinson1 wrote:
Which word? "marriage" or "civil union">?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I see your point... And that 50+% is spot on. My gripe is that gays which are wanting a full fledged catholic wedding and a "Marriage" is unacceptable. Religion basically prohibits gay stuff let alone gay marriage. By granting a "Marriage" to a gay couple is a slap in the face to religion. Granted, I'm no longer religious -but one can't lay claim to a term which was founded by a group with a specific ideal in mind. Give em unions. I wonder what their split rate will be....Kmarion wrote:
I'm just saying this "cherished" word is a laugh.. what are we batting 50-50 now? Hetero's have wiped their ass with that word.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Wait.. Marriage is hell to you?Kmarion wrote:
marriage
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
There isn't anything wrong with homosexuality, but I find flamboyancy to be annoying.
Silly. So for all the people saying keep it behind closed doors where is the line drawn? PDA like kissing and holding hands are taboo if they are gay?
Personally, I think it is wrong. Immoral by my religion, and just odd biologically speaking.
However, I support gay rights. I don't want my nation's laws based on anyone's interpretation of their religion! It is too dangerous to let (imperfect) people determine laws based on their (imperfect) interpretation of religion...even mine.
However, I support gay rights. I don't want my nation's laws based on anyone's interpretation of their religion! It is too dangerous to let (imperfect) people determine laws based on their (imperfect) interpretation of religion...even mine.
Sure, some PDA between two men or two women is ok. At least for me. I'll just look the other way, it's none of my business. I do the same for straight couples.Macbeth wrote:
Silly. So for all the people saying keep it behind closed doors where is the line drawn? PDA like kissing and holding hands are taboo if they are gay?
I guess I have a high tolerance for gay stuff (except for the fucking drama queen flamboyant fags, god those guys are so fucking annoying; in the same sense that valley girls are) because my university and the area around it is a massive hippie bubble. E.g., when Prop. 8 came around, I thought it was going to fail by a landslide, simply because it seemed like everyone around here was voting no; but then I forgot about the rest of the state. (Side note re: Prop 8: I'm apathetic towards it. Literally just don't give a damn.)
As eloquently demonstrated above, I have no problem whatsoever with normal gay folks but I fucking hate loud fags who go around shouting for cock.
![https://www.dragon-gate.com/Images/cpics/RS002_c.jpg](https://www.dragon-gate.com/Images/cpics/RS002_c.jpg)
ƒ³
if it's ok for straight people, it's ok for gaysMacbeth wrote:
Silly. So for all the people saying keep it behind closed doors where is the line drawn? PDA like kissing and holding hands are taboo if they are gay?
ƒ³
You think Christians founded marriage?DBBrinson1 wrote:
I see your point... And that 50+% is spot on. My gripe is that gays which are wanting a full fledged catholic wedding and a "Marriage" is unacceptable. Religion basically prohibits gay stuff let alone gay marriage. By granting a "Marriage" to a gay couple is a slap in the face to religion. Granted, I'm no longer religious -but one can't lay claim to a term which was founded by a group with a specific ideal in mind. Give em unions. I wonder what their split rate will be....Kmarion wrote:
I'm just saying this "cherished" word is a laugh.. what are we batting 50-50 now? Hetero's have wiped their ass with that word.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Wait.. Marriage is hell to you?
No problem with gays. They can do what they want.
but let the lesbos liveFatherTed wrote:
should be burned alive tbf
I bet you were against the wall with a glass to your ear knocking one out.m3thod wrote:
at uni i once heard 2 benders bumming each other. it was all a bit caveman-ish.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
Don't really care, seems more a genetic abnormality than a lifestyle choice.
Let them get on with it, provided they don't get married couples tax allowance or adopt kids.
Unless they'd like to support 'single white male' tax allowance.
PS How come all the lesbians in porn are super-hot but real ones look like rhinos?
Let them get on with it, provided they don't get married couples tax allowance or adopt kids.
Unless they'd like to support 'single white male' tax allowance.
PS How come all the lesbians in porn are super-hot but real ones look like rhinos?
Fuck Israel
Why not?Dilbert_X wrote:
Let them get on with it, provided they don't get married couples tax allowance or adopt kids.
Unless they'd like to support 'single white male' tax allowance.
Surely a gay couple should be entitled to the same rights as a heterosexual one?
Why shouldn't they be allowed to adopt kids?
i just don't give a shit but also think they will burn in hell.