lowing
Banned
+1,662|6941|USA

Dilbert_X wrote:

lowing wrote:

Really? Getting paid for doing nothing? Celbrating and rewarding failure? Sounds pretty liberalesque to me.
Working out a scheme to be paid by a for-profit company for doing nothing strikes me as being the pinnacle of capitalist entrepreneurialism TBH.

If I could find a way to be paid $250,000 for just living my life for 3 years I'd consider myself pretty damn clever.

As the guy said, if you're not happy don't watch the TV show - otherwise if you think people should be limited in how much they can earn, from whom and how, then pop round to your local communist party office and sign up.
Really, you think entrepreneurialism is doing something for nothing? No sweat, blood or tears building something? You think entrepreneurs earn nothing that they receive? Wow, you ARE a liberal.

and no worries, I will not watch, this does not take away from my posts against her being celebrated for neglect and failure.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6395|eXtreme to the maX

lowing wrote:

Really, you think entrepreneurialism is doing something for nothing? No sweat, blood or tears building something?
Of course, entrepreneurialism is working out how to achieve the maximum return for minimum effort and outlay.
If blood, sweat and tears can be avoided entirely then so much the better.

Thats capitalism, plain and simple.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-07-25 07:03:19)

Fuck Israel
Narupug
Fodder Mostly
+150|5886|Vacationland
I'm pretty sure that she is crazy, she has too many issues the babys never should have been born and she should be in a mental institution
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6941|USA

Dilbert_X wrote:

lowing wrote:

Really, you think entrepreneurialism is doing something for nothing? No sweat, blood or tears building something?
Of course, entrepreneurialism is working out how to achieve the maximum return for minimum effort and outlay.
If blood, sweat and tears can be avoided entirely then so much the better.

Thats capitalism, plain and simple.
I am curious if you could name one single entrepreneurial venture, where someone didn't risk, work, sacrifice or nurture their project to achieve success. 

this woman is a baffoon a whore to the system, she is not an entrepreneur.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6395|eXtreme to the maX

lowing wrote:

I am curious if you could name one single entrepreneurial venture, where someone didn't risk, work, sacrifice or nurture their project to achieve success.
Domain camping for one.
No risk, barely any outlay, max profit.

Buy to let for another. Take out bank loan, buy property, rent it out. If it works you take the profit, if it doesn't you run for the hills and the bank takes the hit.
Minimal effort, not much risk, plenty of profit potential.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-07-25 07:13:24)

Fuck Israel
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6941|USA

Dilbert_X wrote:

lowing wrote:

I am curious if you could name one single entrepreneurial venture, where someone didn't risk, work, sacrifice or nurture their project to achieve success.
Domain camping for one.
No risk, barely any outlay, max profit.

Buy to let for another. Take out bank loan, buy property, rent it out. If it works you take the profit, if it doesn't you run for the hills and the bank takes the hit.
Minimal effort, not much risk, plenty of profit potential.
Ahhh ya mean the dot commers..... Yeah didn't they crash in the lat 90's taking fortunes with it?

Also people flipping houses are now down and out, so there goes your assertion that there is no risk involved.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6939

lowing wrote:

If you do not see this as pathetic then shame on you. This woman should have had her kids taken from her, instead of being turned into the next reality TV celebrity for doing nothing except pimping her stupidity and child neglect to the nation for compensation.

lowing wrote:

she is being celebrated and rewarded for her incompentancy, failures and neglect.
This goes toward the rest of us more than it does her. It goes toward our shallowness as a society and what we value in our citizens.

Macbeth wrote:

As for the story, I rather she do this then live off the state.
This sums up how I feel about it. I'm not even going to bother arguing the 'is this liberalism' side of things, because all that will happen is I get fed up of the same circular logic from lowing and call him a moron, which he then takes offence to and makes himself out to be some kind of saint.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6941|USA

ghettoperson wrote:

lowing wrote:

If you do not see this as pathetic then shame on you. This woman should have had her kids taken from her, instead of being turned into the next reality TV celebrity for doing nothing except pimping her stupidity and child neglect to the nation for compensation.

lowing wrote:

she is being celebrated and rewarded for her incompentancy, failures and neglect.
This goes toward the rest of us more than it does her. It goes toward our shallowness as a society and what we value in our citizens.

Macbeth wrote:

As for the story, I rather she do this then live off the state.
This sums up how I feel about it. I'm not even going to bother arguing the 'is this liberalism' side of things, because all that will happen is I get fed up of the same circular logic from lowing and call him a moron, which he then takes offence to and makes himself out to be some kind of saint.
lol, not to mention you can't argue against it anyway...
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7006
She is the Queen of entitlement... She believes she is owed something just for being an irresponsible baby machine... If the TV show didn't offer her money she would have no problem living off of the state of California. She is on welfare but shops at Nordstroms for makeup
http://www.tmz.com/2009/02/18/octomom-m … ics-photo/

Her medical bills for the 8 miracles...
  "According to the LA Times (who has been doing a fabulous job on this story) "2007 records show that Southern California hospitals received an average of $1,198 per day, per patient" when billing Medi-Cal for reimbursement. Take the2007 estimate of $1,198, realize that it is most likely a low estimate, and then multiply it by (sweet Jesus) eight and you'll end up with $9,584 per day. The Mocktuplets were born on January 26. I'm writing this on March 6. That's 40 days. That's $383,360 so far. Add on top of that the $150,000 that just the delivery is rumored to have cost (they had 46 doctors and nurses there for that freak show) and we're at over half a million dollars. Oh, and don't forget that SHE was in the hospital for at least two months before the gate was opened and children came spilling out. At a very reasonable 60 days and using the same reimbursement figures as above, that's another $71,880. Now we're at a whopping $605,240. I DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR THAT! (Sorry. Didn't mean to holler.)"

Her family needed to get her help about 14 kids ago... and they may have tried... but i'm sure the liberal laws in Cali would fight for her right mentally ill or not to have as many babies as she wanted. 

Keep arguing that what she has done and what she continues to do wont cost all the US taxpayers money for a long time after she does a couple of tv shows... She thanks you in advance for your generosity...   Anyone want to bet she buys shit for herself with the money she makes from the TV vultures and has no plans to pay back her med bills or take care of her house or children?     

Cradle to the grave... We will take care of you all...have some more koolaid and sit back and relax

Last edited by [TUF]Catbox (2009-07-25 07:44:30)

Love is the answer
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6939

lowing wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

lowing wrote:

If you do not see this as pathetic then shame on you. This woman should have had her kids taken from her, instead of being turned into the next reality TV celebrity for doing nothing except pimping her stupidity and child neglect to the nation for compensation.

lowing wrote:

she is being celebrated and rewarded for her incompentancy, failures and neglect.
This goes toward the rest of us more than it does her. It goes toward our shallowness as a society and what we value in our citizens.

Macbeth wrote:

As for the story, I rather she do this then live off the state.
This sums up how I feel about it. I'm not even going to bother arguing the 'is this liberalism' side of things, because all that will happen is I get fed up of the same circular logic from lowing and call him a moron, which he then takes offence to and makes himself out to be some kind of saint.
lol, not to mention you can't argue against it anyway...
Just take the small victory that I (partially) agreed with you on something and leave it.
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6473|Ireland

Dilbert_X wrote:

spit wrote:

her choices show she has no logic, morals, ethics, or commonsense
Do you mean like this guy?
http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj25 … icture.jpg
Or maybe him?
http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj25 … cheney.jpg
I mean, how could anyone screw up so badly they let a black liberal into the white house?
Both of those people are liberals and prove my point.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6695|North Carolina

lowing wrote:

http://omg.yahoo.com/news/court-docs-octomom-inks-showbiz-deal-for-tots/25663

We have sunken to an all new low, people are actually going to celebrate this piece of shit by paying her to be such.

she is the new liberal, "look what idiocy did for me, it can happen to you", poster child

How much ya wanna bet she is an Obama supporter?
She might be liberal, she might not.  She clearly isn't in favor of using birth control.
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6473|Ireland

Turquoise wrote:

lowing wrote:

http://omg.yahoo.com/news/court-docs-octomom-inks-showbiz-deal-for-tots/25663

We have sunken to an all new low, people are actually going to celebrate this piece of shit by paying her to be such.

she is the new liberal, "look what idiocy did for me, it can happen to you", poster child

How much ya wanna bet she is an Obama supporter?
She might be liberal, she might not.  She clearly isn't in favor of using birth control.
I heard every one of those 8 kids had different fathers.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6871|SE London

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

lowing wrote:

http://omg.yahoo.com/news/court-docs-octomom-inks-showbiz-deal-for-tots/25663

We have sunken to an all new low, people are actually going to celebrate this piece of shit by paying her to be such.

she is the new liberal, "look what idiocy did for me, it can happen to you", poster child

How much ya wanna bet she is an Obama supporter?
She might be liberal, she might not.  She clearly isn't in favor of using birth control.
I heard every one of those 8 kids had different fathers.
Yeah, of course. Octuplets with different fathers
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6695|North Carolina

Bertster7 wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


She might be liberal, she might not.  She clearly isn't in favor of using birth control.
I heard every one of those 8 kids had different fathers.
Yeah, of course. Octuplets with different fathers
I guess that's called octo-penetration?  lol
Deadmonkiefart
Floccinaucinihilipilificator
+177|6995

Spark wrote:

i know this is lowing but connecting this to Obama and liberalism is a stretch, even for him.
That's not much of a stretch at all.  It would take a person with a liberal mentality to do what she has done and plans to do.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6695|North Carolina

Deadmonkiefart wrote:

Spark wrote:

i know this is lowing but connecting this to Obama and liberalism is a stretch, even for him.
That's not much of a stretch at all.  It would take a person with a liberal mentality to do what she has done and plans to do.
You don't have to be liberal to be a slut.  In fact, in college, it was often the religious girls who seemed most slutty in private (from my experience at least).
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6870|the dank(super) side of Oregon
this is capitalism lowing.  Do you have a problem with capitalism?  Are you a dirty fucking commie, low?


She's the latest trainwreck of our culture, nobody idolizes her, nobody respects her.  She's a mentally disturbed woman in a mentally disturbed society that transcends liberal and conservative ideology.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6941|USA

Reciprocity wrote:

this is capitalism lowing.  Do you have a problem with capitalism?  Are you a dirty fucking commie, low?


She's the latest trainwreck of our culture, nobody idolizes her, nobody respects her.  She's a mentally disturbed woman in a mentally disturbed society that transcends liberal and conservative ideology.
already been addressed
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6473|Ireland

Bertster7 wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


She might be liberal, she might not.  She clearly isn't in favor of using birth control.
I heard every one of those 8 kids had different fathers.
Yeah, of course. Octuplets with different fathers


Potheads are always a little slow, and to think the British pwn'd the Irish who are now their tools.  Doesn't say much for the Irish.
Deadmonkiefart
Floccinaucinihilipilificator
+177|6995

Turquoise wrote:

Deadmonkiefart wrote:

Spark wrote:

i know this is lowing but connecting this to Obama and liberalism is a stretch, even for him.
That's not much of a stretch at all.  It would take a person with a liberal mentality to do what she has done and plans to do.
You don't have to be liberal to be a slut.  In fact, in college, it was often the religious girls who seemed most slutty in private (from my experience at least).
It is not just that she is a slut.  She is a blatant slut.  Religious sluts are more discreet.  Besides, that's no the only reason.
Red Forman
Banned
+402|5690

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:


I heard every one of those 8 kids had different fathers.
Yeah, of course. Octuplets with different fathers


Potheads are always a little slow, and to think the British pwn'd the Irish who are now their tools.  Doesn't say much for the Irish.
lol.

Well, as long as this money finds it ways to the kids (I hope that is the case) then whatever.  I won't watch it.
Narupug
Fodder Mostly
+150|5886|Vacationland
Just because someone is self centered and narcississtic and believes they're owned everything, does NOT MAKE THEM A LIBERAL.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6941|USA

Narupug wrote:

Just because someone is self centered and narcississtic and believes they're owned everything, does NOT MAKE THEM A LIBERAL.
yeah, if you say so.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6870|the dank(super) side of Oregon
Jim David Adkisson, now there's an American Hero.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard