Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6695|North Carolina

Dilbert_X wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Maintaining current bans only ensures a large portion of law enforcement resources go toward drug issues rather than murders or rapes.
I'd argue the converse, it keeps lots of Police officers employed who are then available to deal with major events when they happen.
Rapes and murders get dealt with.
It would be nice if it worked that way, but it doesn't.

http://war-on-drugs.suite101.com/articl … r_on_drugs

http://www.drugsense.org/wodclock.htm

http://www.drugpolicy.org/library/facts … onomic.cfm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_Drugs

Dilbert_X wrote:

Banning more substances only creates more illegal markets.  See Prohibition.
Which brings us back to the 'legalise everything' argument, heroin, LSD, crack, crystal meth.
Heroin used to be legal.  Cocaine also was at one point.  If you tax and regulate substances properly, they result in far lower net costs to society than the ones incurred by organized crime.
13rin
Member
+977|6769
Well, Here it is....

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/07/15 … rijuana%2F

Barney Frank and Ron Paul Team Up to Decriminalize Marijuana
Posted: 07/15/09Filed Under:House, Democrats, Republicans 142 Comments  + Join the discussion »TEXT SIZE:AAAPRINT  SHARE A new bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives that would "eliminate most Federal penalties for possession of marijuana for personal use, and for other purposes." H.R. 5843 is sponsored by Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank and co-sponsored by Texas Republican Ron Paul, among others. The bill carries a very reassuring title, too: Act to Remove Federal Penalties for Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults.

Over the past few years, numerous states have passed so-called "medical marijuana" laws, allowing doctors to prescribe pot to patients to treat a variety of symptoms. A total of 13 states have also passed measures decriminalizing marijuana. This new bill would expand that tolerance of the drug to include open recreational use.

Interviewed recently by Esquire about the new measure, Frank was asked why Congress is taking so long to take action that so many states have pursued. Here's his response:


"This is a case where there's cultural lag on the part of my colleagues. If you ask them privately, they don't think it's a terrible thing. But they're afraid of being portrayed as soft on drugs."


Another politician who has never been accused of being afraid to express his beliefs on legalizing pot is Paul, who gave a memorable interview on the subject a few months ago.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard