http://biggeekdaddy.com/miscvideos/TedNugent.html
video speaks for itself, nothing more I can think to add to it.
video speaks for itself, nothing more I can think to add to it.
Yeah, he makes a reasonable argument for concealed carry. lol"Let's pretend brave families didn't leave the tyrants and the slave drivers of Europe, so that they could practice the religion of their choice and they could speak out without being murdered. That they could produce wool without the Kings men coming and taking it every harvest."
you are correct, it only requires you to carry one if you need to defend yourself, successfully.AussieReaper wrote:
Self defence doesn't require you, me and everyone else to carry a gun. It's as simple as that.Yeah, he makes a reasonable argument for concealed carry. lol"Let's pretend brave families didn't leave the tyrants and the slave drivers of Europe, so that they could practice the religion of their choice and they could speak out without being murdered. That they could produce wool without the Kings men coming and taking it every harvest."
because you agree with it? Or you can not argue against it?ghettoperson wrote:
Pretty sure that's been posted aaaaages ago. I don't really have a lot to say about it though.
I agree that I'd rather criminals ended up dead than old ladies, however I don't believe that in a lot of the examples he provided an old lady was simply going to be able to bust out her pistol and put a couple of rounds through his head. I also think Ted Nugent is a massive douchebag.lowing wrote:
because you agree with it? Or you can not argue against it?ghettoperson wrote:
Pretty sure that's been posted aaaaages ago. I don't really have a lot to say about it though.
Why, you are used to a little more PC?krazed wrote:
i agree with the basic message, not so much with the presentation
Old ladies can and do carry hand guns.ghettoperson wrote:
I agree that I'd rather criminals ended up dead than old ladies, however I don't believe that in a lot of the examples he provided an old lady was simply going to be able to bust out her pistol and put a couple of rounds through his head. I also think Ted Nugent is a massive douchebag.lowing wrote:
because you agree with it? Or you can not argue against it?ghettoperson wrote:
Pretty sure that's been posted aaaaages ago. I don't really have a lot to say about it though.
What the fuck are you talking about? Nowhere in that post did I say that old ladies didn't carry, I said that I didn't think if they got thrown out of their car into the road and got the shit kicked out of them they'd be able to pull a gun out on their attacker.lowing wrote:
Old ladies can and do carry hand guns.ghettoperson wrote:
I agree that I'd rather criminals ended up dead than old ladies, however I don't believe that in a lot of the examples he provided an old lady was simply going to be able to bust out her pistol and put a couple of rounds through his head. I also think Ted Nugent is a massive douchebag.lowing wrote:
because you agree with it? Or you can not argue against it?
He does not do drugs, does not drink, runs a youth camp, , is pro-conservation, never been arrested or in jail, yeah, he is a real pice of shit all right.
no, because giving speeches like that is what gets even more restrictions put in place thanks to the easily scared and manipulated publiclowing wrote:
Why, you are used to a little more PC?krazed wrote:
i agree with the basic message, not so much with the presentation
I doubt many could pull a gun and shoot, AFTER they have been thrown out of a car and gotten the shit kicked out of them. the premise being you pull the gun and defend yourself BEFORE you get pulled out of the car and beat to death.ghettoperson wrote:
What the fuck are you talking about? Nowhere in that post did I say that old ladies didn't carry, I said that I didn't think if they got thrown out of their car into the road and got the shit kicked out of them they'd be able to pull a gun out on their attacker.lowing wrote:
Old ladies can and do carry hand guns.ghettoperson wrote:
I agree that I'd rather criminals ended up dead than old ladies, however I don't believe that in a lot of the examples he provided an old lady was simply going to be able to bust out her pistol and put a couple of rounds through his head. I also think Ted Nugent is a massive douchebag.
He does not do drugs, does not drink, runs a youth camp, , is pro-conservation, never been arrested or in jail, yeah, he is a real pice of shit all right.
Lowing, you can be a fucking saint in terms of your actions for all I care, but the way he gave that little talk he came off as nothing but a grade A douchebag.
Yer correct.krazed wrote:
no, because giving speeches like that is what gets even more restrictions put in place thanks to the easily scared and manipulated publiclowing wrote:
Why, you are used to a little more PC?krazed wrote:
i agree with the basic message, not so much with the presentation
you know, like the people who call an AR-15 an "assault weapon" but a Ruger mini 14 a hunting rifle
i.e. people who don't know shit about firearms, but pass/support laws restricting them anyway
the same people who just can't see that a gun can have any other use than murdering babies and children
I also like his notion that the second amendment already gives him the right to conceal carry. Makes sense.Pierre wrote:
I think the guy is right, in principle. Maybe it isn't brought in a nice way, but it is the truth.
Law obiding people, with no conviction on their record, should be able to purchase a gun without any questions, just some permit from their local policedepartment.
that's the way it's done here... it seems to be working quite wellPierre wrote:
I think the guy is right, in principle. Maybe it isn't brought in a nice way, but it is the truth.
Law obiding people, with no conviction on their record, should be able to purchase a gun without any questions, just some permit from their local policedepartment.