King_County_Downy wrote:
A 16 yr old banging a 14 yr old is not uncommon. Nor is it illegal to the best of my knowledge so... meh, help the guy out. Getting laid at 16 is a pretty big deal to most guys.
It may not be uncommon or illegal, I'll still think it is pretty sick. If it a 16 year old guy is so desperate about getting laid he resorts to such sick practises, I suggest he finds himself a sheep.
mtb0minime wrote:
(16 / 2) + 7 = 15
14 < 15
It's a no go.
On the contrary, you only live once and it's not illegal so GO FOR IT!!!
Is that a pedometer aka a formula used to calculate the MANAD (maximum allowed negative age difference)? Because if it is, it can not possibly be accurate. In highschool, I once tried to put together a universal formula to calculate the MANAD, one that applies to relationships involving men and women of all ages from 0 to 100 and is consistently accurate for that entire range. Even with the aid of a maths "freak" classmate and my maths teacher, I failed. This was the closest we got:
V[t] = (15*e^(0.0861*t[m] - 2.646)) / (e^(0.0861*t[m] - 2.646) + e^(-0.0861*t[m] + 2.646))
In which case:
V[t] = MANAD
t[m] = Age of Male Subject
Subsequently, with:
V[w] = t[m] - t[v]
V[w] = Real Age Difference (RAD)
t[m] = Age of Male Subject
t[v] = Age of Female Subject
P[i] = V[w] - V[t]
P[i] = Pedophilic Index
V[w] = Real Age Difference (RAD)
V[t] = MANAD
Evidently, the Pedophilic Index gives an indication of the level of pedophily associated with the male subject in an existing or intended relationship, by determining if and how much the real age difference value deviates from the maximum allowed difference value.
We originally also coded a programs that could be run easily by adolescent males with a sex drive that approached despair. They simply had to input their age and that of a specific girl, and the program would say something like "hit it" or "find sheep". There were however no levels of advice other than positive or negative asd the Pedophilic Index was not incorported into the program back then.
Note that these formulae only apply to relationships were the proposed male subject is older than the proposed female subject. A different set of formulae could have been developped for relationships were the proposed female subject is older than the proposed male subject, but this was not seen as desirable, as the (possible) occurence of these relationships seems to be very rare and whenever such a relation does occur, motives often differ entirely. In these rare cases the relationship is generally mutually emotionally based rather than single sided sexually-convenience based or driven.
Last edited by Lai (2009-07-09 14:39:48)