But you followed their orders yes?usm wrote:
never met them sorry
Fuck Israel
But you followed their orders yes?usm wrote:
never met them sorry
duhDilbert_X wrote:
But you followed their orders yes?usmarine wrote:
never met them sorry
Well there you go, you knew them well enough to follow their instructions, good enough for me -> you knew two people who believed Saddam had close ties with Bin Laden.usm wrote:
duh
If your boss gives you a directive to do something, then he gets arrested for sexual assault, does that mean you generally take orders from pedo's? That's a horrible argument to start off with.Dilbert_X wrote:
Well there you go, you knew them well enough to follow their instructions, good enough for me -> you knew two people who believed Saddam had close ties with Bin Laden.usm wrote:
duh
No, but if my boss says "Go kill that guy, he's a pedo" and I go do it then you can say I knew someone who believed the guy I killed was a pedo.Zombie_Affair wrote:
If your boss gives you a directive to do something, then he gets arrested for sexual assault, does that mean you generally take orders from pedo's? That's a horrible argument to start off with.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-07-03 06:17:55)
i dont know what they believe. i know what they say. but i dont believe politicians.Dilbert_X wrote:
Well there you go, you knew them well enough to follow their instructions, good enough for me -> you knew two people who believed Saddam had close ties with Bin Laden.usm wrote:
duh
i believe people i know.Dilbert_X wrote:
OK they said they believed, no-one can know what someone else believes.
I never heard anyone say it...ever. so no, cant say i did 100% for sure.Dilbert_X wrote:
As someone else pointed out, some percentage or other of Americans believed Saddam was connected with 9/11.
The odds are er reasonable you might have known one of these people.
Your country is then covered by a thick cloud of misinformation. Either that or you're in denial. Or both tbh.usmarine wrote:
i dont know anyone who thought that....ever. you are in denial (or just a media sheep)Bertster7 wrote:
Of course they did. That's why there were enormous protests across the world with big banners saying just that, right before the invasion.usmarine wrote:
lol what a joke. you are nuts sometimes erm most of the time. no real people thought that.
You're just in denial.
koug wrote:
Your country is then covered by a thick cloud of misinformation. Either that or you're in denial. Or both tbh.
No need to get angry just because you were wrong.DeathBecomesYu wrote:
Some of you need to remember what "hindsight" means.....seriously.
I remember it like this. When 9-11 happened, myself and everyone I knew blamed one group, who later told the world that they did it and every since our government has been rounding them up except for the leaders. I never heard from anyone who thought or believed that Saddam was behind or involved with 9-11.
Please remember why we fought Saddam.....he invaded Kuwait!!!!!!! and then threatened other countries. The US liberated Kuwait during the first gulf war with the help of 34 other nations and the UN blessing. No fly zones were set up and sanctions were put in place. Saddam refused to follow the sanctions and escalated the situation over and over by refusing UN inspectors, so forth....which heightened everyone's concerns(North Korea anyone?)...eventually the second gulf war happened with less support.
Now, I could care less about what ties he or she thought about. I knew two things....terrorists committed 9-11 and Saddam invaded another country and refused to cooperate with anyone. They were two separate issues that some people TRIED to tie together but again, no one I knew thought that way, maybe others did.
No one can say they "knew" what we are finding out now, not even the UN was sure, but for some of you to sit here and say "I told you so" is a joke. We will probably never really know the whole story and some of us are smart enough not to believe every word we hear in the press or our government (especially now). But seriously get off your high horses, your "I told you so" non-sense...none of you knew jack shit.
I wonder why you skipped the part about why Iraq was invaded ...DeathBecomesYu wrote:
Some of you need to remember what "hindsight" means.....seriously.
I remember it like this. When 9-11 happened, myself and everyone I knew blamed one group, who later told the world that they did it and every since our government has been rounding them up except for the leaders. I never heard from anyone who thought or believed that Saddam was behind or involved with 9-11.
Please remember why we fought Saddam.....he invaded Kuwait!!!!!!! and then threatened other countries. The US liberated Kuwait during the first gulf war with the help of 34 other nations and the UN blessing. No fly zones were set up and sanctions were put in place. Saddam refused to follow the sanctions and escalated the situation over and over by refusing UN inspectors, so forth....which heightened everyone's concerns(North Korea anyone?)...eventually the second gulf war happened with less support.
Now, I could care less about what ties he or she thought about. I knew two things....terrorists committed 9-11 and Saddam invaded another country and refused to cooperate with anyone. They were two separate issues that some people TRIED to tie together but again, no one I knew thought that way, maybe others did.
No one can say they "knew" what we are finding out now, not even the UN was sure, but for some of you to sit here and say "I told you so" is a joke. We will probably never really know the whole story and some of us are smart enough not to believe every word we hear in the press or our government (especially now). But seriously get off your high horses, your "I told you so" non-sense...none of you knew jack shit.
saddam was lied to and lied himself about wmd's. next.Varegg wrote:
I wonder why you skipped the part about why Iraq was invaded ...
You are missing my point and no, I didn't forget why Iraq was invaded. My point is that none of you knew back then what you know now and that no one I knew thought the two were combined. By the way, there were many things I left out, for the sake of the post length...my point still stands.Varegg wrote:
I wonder why you skipped the part about why Iraq was invaded ...DeathBecomesYu wrote:
Some of you need to remember what "hindsight" means.....seriously.
I remember it like this. When 9-11 happened, myself and everyone I knew blamed one group, who later told the world that they did it and every since our government has been rounding them up except for the leaders. I never heard from anyone who thought or believed that Saddam was behind or involved with 9-11.
Please remember why we fought Saddam.....he invaded Kuwait!!!!!!! and then threatened other countries. The US liberated Kuwait during the first gulf war with the help of 34 other nations and the UN blessing. No fly zones were set up and sanctions were put in place. Saddam refused to follow the sanctions and escalated the situation over and over by refusing UN inspectors, so forth....which heightened everyone's concerns(North Korea anyone?)...eventually the second gulf war happened with less support.
Now, I could care less about what ties he or she thought about. I knew two things....terrorists committed 9-11 and Saddam invaded another country and refused to cooperate with anyone. They were two separate issues that some people TRIED to tie together but again, no one I knew thought that way, maybe others did.
No one can say they "knew" what we are finding out now, not even the UN was sure, but for some of you to sit here and say "I told you so" is a joke. We will probably never really know the whole story and some of us are smart enough not to believe every word we hear in the press or our government (especially now). But seriously get off your high horses, your "I told you so" non-sense...none of you knew jack shit.
That may be so but many of us predicted what we now know ... both before, during and after the invasion ...DeathBecomesYu wrote:
You are missing my point and no, I didn't forget why Iraq was invaded. My point is that none of you knew back then what you know now and that no one I knew thought the two were combined. By the way, there were many things I left out, for the sake of the post length...my point still stands.Varegg wrote:
I wonder why you skipped the part about why Iraq was invaded ...DeathBecomesYu wrote:
Some of you need to remember what "hindsight" means.....seriously.
I remember it like this. When 9-11 happened, myself and everyone I knew blamed one group, who later told the world that they did it and every since our government has been rounding them up except for the leaders. I never heard from anyone who thought or believed that Saddam was behind or involved with 9-11.
Please remember why we fought Saddam.....he invaded Kuwait!!!!!!! and then threatened other countries. The US liberated Kuwait during the first gulf war with the help of 34 other nations and the UN blessing. No fly zones were set up and sanctions were put in place. Saddam refused to follow the sanctions and escalated the situation over and over by refusing UN inspectors, so forth....which heightened everyone's concerns(North Korea anyone?)...eventually the second gulf war happened with less support.
Now, I could care less about what ties he or she thought about. I knew two things....terrorists committed 9-11 and Saddam invaded another country and refused to cooperate with anyone. They were two separate issues that some people TRIED to tie together but again, no one I knew thought that way, maybe others did.
No one can say they "knew" what we are finding out now, not even the UN was sure, but for some of you to sit here and say "I told you so" is a joke. We will probably never really know the whole story and some of us are smart enough not to believe every word we hear in the press or our government (especially now). But seriously get off your high horses, your "I told you so" non-sense...none of you knew jack shit.
You know the meaning of the word prediction no?usmarine wrote:
you didnt know, you guessed. there is only one way to find out for sure yes?
Invade!usmarine wrote:
you didnt know, you guessed. there is only one way to find out for sure yes?
after years and years of his crap.....cant say he didnt have it coming....or fair warning yes?AussieReaper wrote:
Invade!usmarine wrote:
you didnt know, you guessed. there is only one way to find out for sure yes?
So you guessed everything perfectly.....do you have the next set of lottery numbersVaregg wrote:
You know the meaning of the word prediction no?usmarine wrote:
you didnt know, you guessed. there is only one way to find out for sure yes?
no i dont. thank you.Varegg wrote:
You know the meaning of the word prediction no?usmarine wrote:
you didnt know, you guessed. there is only one way to find out for sure yes?
Last edited by usmarine (2009-07-03 08:45:26)