Orange Box from ebay $45 including postage from Melbourne.Cheez wrote:
HAY! WHOS UP 4 SUM L4D?
also wtf post. Online dickballs, we're 80c/$1.
hey
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
29.99 USD = 37.6720 AUDAussieReaper wrote:
Orange Box from ebay $45 including postage from Melbourne.Cheez wrote:
HAY! WHOS UP 4 SUM L4D?
also wtf post. Online dickballs, we're 80c/$1.
$37.67 + $3.00 conversion fee = $40.67
You lose, good day sir.
Also, you'd have it now.
Last edited by Cheez (2009-06-09 05:03:30)
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
bl on losing your ($45 - $40.67)cents cheezCheez wrote:
29.99 USD = 37.6720 AUDAussieReaper wrote:
Orange Box from ebay $45 including postage from Melbourne.Cheez wrote:
HAY! WHOS UP 4 SUM L4D?
also wtf post. Online dickballs, we're 80c/$1.
$37.67 + $3.00 conversion fee = $40.67
You lose, good day sir.
Also, you'd have it now.
THINK OF THE RECESSION
Reaps dw bout these dudes they still play TF2.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
Do we?
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
Oh but you don't? Is that what you're saying?Flecco wrote:
Reaps dw bout these dudes they still play TF2.
i made fairy bread
Last edited by RavyGravy (2009-06-09 05:15:30)
My mum made me fairy bread for lunch on monday.RavyGravy wrote:
i made fairy bread
IN YOUR FACE RAVEN!
i havnt had fairy bread in years.....screw exams tomoro, im making fairy bread
I play it more than them. Currently they are on a bit of a L4D bender but it should get boring for them too soon. I hope. Idk, I just seem to have a really hard time getting a good vs. game running in that.AussieReaper wrote:
Oh but you don't? Is that what you're saying?Flecco wrote:
Reaps dw bout these dudes they still play TF2.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
An excellent choice, sir.~FuzZz~ wrote:
i havnt had fairy bread in years.....screw exams tomoro, im making fairy bread
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
I seriously hope you're trolling.AussieReaper wrote:
How is -1 larger than -10?Hakei wrote:
A triple major who couldn't work out that -1 is larger than -10.
Nice try again Reaper, but you're providing nothing solid and I just woke up from a nap. I'll prove you're an idiot later.
If you have 50 beans, and I decide to -1 from them, you still have 49.
But if I decide to -10, then I take away more and you only have 40 beans.
Seriously, tell me you're trolling.
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
You have a hard time staying in any server in any online game at allFlecco wrote:
I play it more than them. Currently they are on a bit of a L4D bender but it should get boring for them too soon. I hope. Idk, I just seem to have a really hard time getting a good vs. game running in that.AussieReaper wrote:
Oh but you don't? Is that what you're saying?Flecco wrote:
Reaps dw bout these dudes they still play TF2.
Also, the secret is to run the lobby, invite everyone on your list, then start the game when 3 more people have joined. Fills up pretty fast.
Are you still stalling?Hakei wrote:
I seriously hope you're trolling.AussieReaper wrote:
How is -1 larger than -10?Hakei wrote:
A triple major who couldn't work out that -1 is larger than -10.
Nice try again Reaper, but you're providing nothing solid and I just woke up from a nap. I'll prove you're an idiot later.
If you have 50 beans, and I decide to -1 from them, you still have 49.
But if I decide to -10, then I take away more and you only have 40 beans.
Seriously, tell me you're trolling.
First you had just woken up from a nap. Now all you can say is "are you trolling?"
So much for the "I'll prove you're an idiot later."
Fenris, probably only invite half my steam 'friends' list m8. Trust me. Tis pretty big.
Even at the best of times I have a hard time getting a good game of l4d going. With TF2 I can just fire it up and find a populated server... L4D takes effort.
Even at the best of times I have a hard time getting a good game of l4d going. With TF2 I can just fire it up and find a populated server... L4D takes effort.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
i hate to say it guys, but im with badei on this one, -1 =more than -10AussieReaper wrote:
Are you still stalling?Hakei wrote:
I seriously hope you're trolling.AussieReaper wrote:
How is -1 larger than -10?
If you have 50 beans, and I decide to -1 from them, you still have 49.
But if I decide to -10, then I take away more and you only have 40 beans.
Seriously, tell me you're trolling.
First you had just woken up from a nap. Now all you can say is "are you trolling?"
So much for the "I'll prove you're an idiot later."
~FuzZz~ wrote:
i hate to say it guys, but im with badei on this one, -1 =more than -10AussieReaper wrote:
Are you still stalling?Hakei wrote:
I seriously hope you're trolling.
Seriously, tell me you're trolling.
First you had just woken up from a nap. Now all you can say is "are you trolling?"
So much for the "I'll prove you're an idiot later."
TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
Yeh, it depends how you are taught.
Some say -100 is smaller than -1, some say -100 is larger (ie more negative) than -1.
Both ways are correct, provided you are thinking of it in the right way.
Depends on your interpretation Fuzz.
Reaper quite clearly meant that -10 was of greater negative value, in other words, -10 was of lesser positive value or worth less. Basically, playing semantics doesn't make Reaps' mathematical premise put forward in his original post on this topic faulty. His intended statement was that Hakei's probable chance of being amusing would increase exponentially toward negative infinity, making it mathematically impossibly for Hakei to be funny. While I disagree with that, Hakei having been very amusing on several occasions, Reaper's original intended statement on the subject made sense before everybody started dancing around like fucking monkeys arguing over something irrelevant to the original meaning of the post.
Reaper can feel free to correct me if I've mistaken his intentions and the meaning behind his humorous attempt at mocking Hakei.
Reaper quite clearly meant that -10 was of greater negative value, in other words, -10 was of lesser positive value or worth less. Basically, playing semantics doesn't make Reaps' mathematical premise put forward in his original post on this topic faulty. His intended statement was that Hakei's probable chance of being amusing would increase exponentially toward negative infinity, making it mathematically impossibly for Hakei to be funny. While I disagree with that, Hakei having been very amusing on several occasions, Reaper's original intended statement on the subject made sense before everybody started dancing around like fucking monkeys arguing over something irrelevant to the original meaning of the post.
Reaper can feel free to correct me if I've mistaken his intentions and the meaning behind his humorous attempt at mocking Hakei.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
Flecco....you know maths o.O
Tim fuckoff my vicious barrage of verbiage is a better answer.
Spoiler (highlight to read):
I know a little. Never found it very interesting though so I basically didn't pay any attention. Prefer stories.
Wait you understood that tank-trapping pile of shit I wrote?TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
Flecco....you know maths o.O
Spoiler (highlight to read):
I know a little. Never found it very interesting though so I basically didn't pay any attention. Prefer stories.
Last edited by Flecco (2009-06-09 23:01:22)
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
ALL FUCKING DAY ive had that feeling like im just about to sneeze, i can feel it in my nose BUT NO FUCKING SNEEZ! ALL FUCKING DAY
ASIAN APPROVES OF THIS MATHS AS WELLFlecco wrote:
Depends on your interpretation Fuzz.
Reaper quite clearly meant that -10 was of greater negative value, in other words, -10 was of lesser positive value or worth less. Basically, playing semantics doesn't make Reaps' mathematical premise put forward in his original post on this topic faulty. His intended statement was that Hakei's probable chance of being amusing would increase exponentially toward negative infinity, making it mathematically impossibly for Hakei to be funny. While I disagree with that, Hakei having been very amusing on several occasions, Reaper's original intended statement on the subject made sense before everybody started dancing around like fucking monkeys arguing over something irrelevant to the original meaning of the post.
Reaper can feel free to correct me if I've mistaken his intentions and the meaning behind his humorous attempt at mocking Hakei.
It's a plane tbh.
