the monarchy brings in toooonnnnns of money in tourism, we let them do whatever they want tbf.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
I've been cleansed, Americanized I am.usmarine wrote:
stop messing with me frenchie
Yeah but I've heard tis pretty extravagant. With such a massive deficit you would think they'd be cutting costs where possible. Guess not. Don't worry, the USA isn't alone, Australia has a similar problem at the moment.Kmarion wrote:
Because he is the President.Flecco wrote:
Well tbh the Whitehouse is a bigger money sink as far as I can see. How many staff in that place? Why should the President be waited on 24/7?
Serious? What about maintaining all the royal estates and shite?FatherTed wrote:
nah its something daft like 7p i think.
I'm positive the president cost us less then a tenner.. and he is actually works.Flecco wrote:
Yeah but I've heard tis pretty extravagant. With such a massive deficit you would think they'd be cutting costs where possible. Guess not. Don't worry, the USA isn't alone, Australia has a similar problem at the moment.Kmarion wrote:
Because he is the President.Flecco wrote:
Well tbh the Whitehouse is a bigger money sink as far as I can see. How many staff in that place? Why should the President be waited on 24/7?
Last I heard the Royal family costs each tax payer something like a tenner a year in the UK.
Dollars from tourism.Turquoise wrote:
I've never understood figurehead monarchies. They're even more useless than the Electoral College.
There are plenty more reasons to visit said countries. Most people I know don't visit England for the monarchy.Flecco wrote:
Dollars from tourism.Turquoise wrote:
I've never understood figurehead monarchies. They're even more useless than the Electoral College.
That's why I said I'd LOVE to see how that works out. Expense wise..Flecco wrote:
Dollars from tourism.Turquoise wrote:
I've never understood figurehead monarchies. They're even more useless than the Electoral College.
fuck knows, they're normally quite quiet about their costs and pros.Kmarion wrote:
That's why I said I'd LOVE to see how that works out. Expense wise..Flecco wrote:
Dollars from tourism.Turquoise wrote:
I've never understood figurehead monarchies. They're even more useless than the Electoral College.
You leave Chuck Norris out of this.Bull3t wrote:
Even though it's our money, What's a couple of tens of thousands of dollars to one of the most powerful men in the world?
You think he cares? no.
It's only out of love Kmarion. Relax.Kmarion wrote:
You leave Chuck Norris out of this.Bull3t wrote:
Even though it's our money, What's a couple of tens of thousands of dollars to one of the most powerful men in the world?
You think he cares? no.
He said one of.Kmarion wrote:
You leave Chuck Norris out of this.Bull3t wrote:
Even though it's our money, What's a couple of tens of thousands of dollars to one of the most powerful men in the world?
You think he cares? no.
I've gotten a chill and a relax in less than 30 minutes.. if you guys only knew..l0lBull3t wrote:
It's only out of love Kmarion. Relax.Kmarion wrote:
You leave Chuck Norris out of this.Bull3t wrote:
Even though it's our money, What's a couple of tens of thousands of dollars to one of the most powerful men in the world?
You think he cares? no.
So how many people do you know visit England on a regular basis? 2? 10? 10000?Turquoise wrote:
There are plenty more reasons to visit said countries. Most people I know don't visit England for the monarchy.Flecco wrote:
Dollars from tourism.Turquoise wrote:
I've never understood figurehead monarchies. They're even more useless than the Electoral College.