lowing
Banned
+1,662|6647|USA

Flecco wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Nope, we need the risk takers, we do not need the free loaders.

Providing opportunity throgh private risk, and the eventual payoff and growth is what is needed. Not a bunch of fools walking around thinking they are entitled to the good life by the work and risk of others.
Paid maternity leave is a very socialist concept, but rather than a woman quitting her job, with it she is more likely to rejoin the workforce.

Can you even acknowledge any benefits of a centric system, or does any remotely socialist concept equal "free loaders"?
If I had to guess I'd say lowing will tell you paid maternity leave should be left to the discretion of the employer, as ultimately it is their money and their job they are offering to others, putting their reputation on the line by employing these people as part of their company.
your amazing...now the big question is, do you believe it?
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6647|USA

AussieReaper wrote:

Flecco wrote:

If I had to guess I'd say lowing will tell you paid maternity leave should be left to the discretion of the employer, as ultimately it is their money and their job they are offering to others, putting their reputation on the line by employing these people as part of their company.
If paid maternity is left to the discretion of the employer, they simply never hire women.

If it is taxpayer funded, the company doesn't lose anything. And it is more likely to attract competitive female workers.
ever hear the expression sex sells? Yeah, they will hire women.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6647|USA

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:


Major stock holders?

How can shareholders, who in most cases own 49% or less of a company have any say?
I am assuming yo think a person wh oinvest millions into a company has no say as to that company's direction? really?
A person. Singular? A single person investing millions into a company. Sounds to me like they are more than just a shareholder.

The ones who have no say are the self funded retirees who put their savings into one of these companies and expected at least some return when they file for bankruptcy. But they get nothing. The CEO's still get their millions.
That is why it is called investing. Investing does not denote a sure thing pay out. the bigger the risk the bigger the payout.

If you do not like that idea I suggest you stay away from the stock market. Or doesyour entitlement now give you the "right" to risk free investing?
fadedsteve
GOP Sympathizer
+266|6486|Menlo Park, CA
Obama is a fucking disaster. . . . . . . People thought Bush didnt know what he was doing. . . . . .
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|6712

fadedsteve wrote:

Obama is a fucking disaster. . . . . . . People thought Bush didnt know what he was doing. . . . . .
give it time lol... buyer remorse is already happening.
Change is what people wanted... now they see what he meant by change.
Jimmy Carter has nothing on this guy.
Love is the answer
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6401|North Carolina

fadedsteve wrote:

Obama is a fucking disaster. . . . . . . People thought Bush didnt know what he was doing. . . . . .
I still don't see what makes you think Obama is worse than Bush.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard