Then you're forgetting Gulf War 1, the Arab-Israeli wars, the Iranian revolution, the Iran-Iraq war.lowing wrote:
hmmmmmmm don't remember fighting in the ME before the 911 attacks. or before the WTC'93 attacks, or the USS Cole attack, or the embassy attacks.
Oh well as long as it is to other European countries.Flecco wrote:
Only to other European countries so far for the most part. I guess the Moors and the Mongolians had some successes.lowing wrote:
no, history dictate that European countries, loose their countries.FatherTed wrote:
history dictates that the european militarys are weak?
hahahahahaha just read back through what you just typed.
Even then it was temporary. Crazy Spaniards and their reconquista (sp).
I dunno, I am not a crazy leader of a crazy radical Islamic nation. Might wanna ask him why he wants a missle that can reach Europe.PureFodder wrote:
Why would Iran launch a missile at Eurabia Lowing, seeing as us Europeans all already bending over backwards to appease Islam and will be entirely taken over by Islam in the next few decades?
That would be like throwing grenades at the house you're just about to move into.
Yes because peace was prevalent in the ME until the US showed up. Also lets not forget European meddling in the ME. So based on your post of meddling, you now have another good reason for Iran to attack Europe.Dilbert_X wrote:
Then you're forgetting Gulf War 1, the Arab-Israeli wars, the Iranian revolution, the Iran-Iraq war.lowing wrote:
hmmmmmmm don't remember fighting in the ME before the 911 attacks. or before the WTC'93 attacks, or the USS Cole attack, or the embassy attacks.
All the above essentially triggered by US meddling.
lowing wrote:
hmmmmmmm don't remember fighting in the ME before the 911 attacks.
Make up your mind and pick one.lowing wrote:
Yes because peace was prevalent in the ME until the US showed up.
Not meddling? Well that is funny, I wonder who was wearing the British, Macedonian, Cech Republic, Polish, Romanian ETC............. uniforms I saw over there.Dilbert_X wrote:
lowing wrote:
hmmmmmmm don't remember fighting in the ME before the 911 attacks.Make up your mind and pick one.lowing wrote:
Yes because peace was prevalent in the ME until the US showed up.
'Europe' Is not currently meddling in the ME.
'Europe' has not recently invaded two ME nations, destabilised a third and been threatening a fourth.
Last edited by lowing (2009-05-20 08:35:50)
So they have something nearing a credible retaliatory strike in case we decide to attack them?lowing wrote:
I dunno, I am not a crazy leader of a crazy radical Islamic nation. Might wanna ask him why he wants a missle that can reach Europe.PureFodder wrote:
Why would Iran launch a missile at Eurabia Lowing, seeing as us Europeans all already bending over backwards to appease Islam and will be entirely taken over by Islam in the next few decades?
That would be like throwing grenades at the house you're just about to move into.
Several European countries were present for both invasions and Afghanistan is a NATO mission in which we are participating, along with a few other non-NATO nations.Dilbert_X wrote:
lowing wrote:
hmmmmmmm don't remember fighting in the ME before the 911 attacks.Make up your mind and pick one.lowing wrote:
Yes because peace was prevalent in the ME until the US showed up.
'Europe' Is not currently meddling in the ME.
'Europe' has not recently invaded two ME nations, destabilised a third and been threatening a fourth.
But Europe love Iran so I am lead to believe, and Iran is supposed to love Europe so I am lead to believe. Sp no need for missles.PureFodder wrote:
So they have something nearing a credible retaliatory strike in case we decide to attack them?lowing wrote:
I dunno, I am not a crazy leader of a crazy radical Islamic nation. Might wanna ask him why he wants a missle that can reach Europe.PureFodder wrote:
Why would Iran launch a missile at Eurabia Lowing, seeing as us Europeans all already bending over backwards to appease Islam and will be entirely taken over by Islam in the next few decades?
That would be like throwing grenades at the house you're just about to move into.
If we they attack us we all know that there won't be an Iran for much longer, we on the other hand can strike without expecting much in the way of retalliation. A long range missile force can give Iran some security against us meddling with their country again.
p.s. Since when has the leader of Iran been crazy?
By Saudis.lowing wrote:
THEN we were attacked
Sighhhhhhhhhh, again.Dilbert_X wrote:
By Saudis.lowing wrote:
THEN we were attacked
What did that have to do with Iraq?
Iraq had no WMD or nuclear program and was not involved in terrorism.
OTOH Iran had extensive WMD, a nuclear program and was heavily involved in terrorism, Hezbollah etc.
Why attack Iraq?
Last edited by lowing (2009-05-20 08:45:24)
Securing the flanks for a two-pronged ground assault.Dilbert_X wrote:
By Saudis.lowing wrote:
THEN we were attacked
What did that have to do with Iraq?
Iraq had no WMD or nuclear program and was not involved in terrorism.
OTOH Iran had extensive WMD, a nuclear program and was heavily involved in terrorism, Hezbollah etc.
Why attack Iraq?
When did Khamenei say that?lowing wrote:
But Europe love Iran so I am lead to believe, and Iran is supposed to love Europe so I am lead to believe. Sp no need for missles.PureFodder wrote:
So they have something nearing a credible retaliatory strike in case we decide to attack them?lowing wrote:
I dunno, I am not a crazy leader of a crazy radical Islamic nation. Might wanna ask him why he wants a missle that can reach Europe.
If we they attack us we all know that there won't be an Iran for much longer, we on the other hand can strike without expecting much in the way of retalliation. A long range missile force can give Iran some security against us meddling with their country again.
p.s. Since when has the leader of Iran been crazy?
Oh I dunno, I guess announcing desires to wipe another country off the face of the earth seems kinda crazy for a national leader. That is just me though
Europe is not meddling, there is nothing to tell.lowing wrote:
also when are you going to tell me more about how Europe is not meddling in the ME?
YOu may wanna tell the coalition forces that, THEY think they are in Iraq and Afghanistan right nowDilbert_X wrote:
Europe is not meddling, there is nothing to tell.lowing wrote:
also when are you going to tell me more about how Europe is not meddling in the ME?
Sorry, they were there from day one pal.Dilbert_X wrote:
Trying to stabilise the situation, which generally they didn't create in the first place.
Last edited by lowing (2009-05-20 08:56:21)
91 was different, approved by the UN - to fix a mistake made by the US in giving Saddam the green light to invade Kuwait.lowing wrote:
I might also add that they were there in '91 as well. but please keep trying
The US gave Saddam the green light to invade Kuwait? link please.Dilbert_X wrote:
91 was different, approved by the UN - to fix a mistake made by the US in giving Saddam the green light to invade Kuwait.lowing wrote:
I might also add that they were there in '91 as well. but please keep trying
Last edited by lowing (2009-05-20 09:06:22)
No blissful ignorance gave us 911.Dilbert_X wrote:
Exactly the same place as radical Christian ideology and radical Jewish ideology.lowing wrote:
is a radical Islamic country and we all know where radical Islamic ideology leads to.
The West catalysed radical Islam.
Leave them alone and they won't bother you, eventually they'll fade away.
If the US would stop stirring up the ME we wouldn't have these problems.
Wat?Dilbert_X wrote:
91 was different, approved by the UN - to fix a mistake made by the US in giving Saddam the green light to invade Kuwait.lowing wrote:
I might also add that they were there in '91 as well. but please keep trying
Last I heard he went ahead with the invasion because he didn't get any answer back at all from the USA when he asked. Meh, who knows.M.O.A.B wrote:
Wat?Dilbert_X wrote:
91 was different, approved by the UN - to fix a mistake made by the US in giving Saddam the green light to invade Kuwait.lowing wrote:
I might also add that they were there in '91 as well. but please keep trying
It is a radical islamic government, not a radical islamic country. Besides Iran isn't stupid enough to really start throwing with live nukes, not even against Israel. Threaten, sure, but actually launching them, no. Iranians might not be "our friends", but they aren't retarded like the Taliban, not even remotely.lowing wrote:
It is a radical Islamic country and we all know where radical Islamic ideology leads to.Mekstizzle wrote:
lowing I'd like you to give the best explanation possible as to why you think Iran is such a massive problem for Europe and would consider launching an ICBM at a European nation
How the hell is the "problem" of Iran something that needs "dirty work" to be fixed?
Huh, never heard of that.Flecco wrote:
Last I heard he went ahead with the invasion because he didn't get any answer back at all from the USA when he asked. Meh, who knows.M.O.A.B wrote:
Wat?Dilbert_X wrote:
91 was different, approved by the UN - to fix a mistake made by the US in giving Saddam the green light to invade Kuwait.
