SofaKing18
L33TGamerz.com
+7|5800|Rainbowland

ATG wrote:

9-11
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6592|Éire

FEOS wrote:

Braddock wrote:

I've said many times before that I couldn't really give a shit what happens to actual proven terrorists... what worries me is a system that does not worry about legitimately proving whether a person is a terrorist or not and just proceeds straight to the torture.
Then what are you crying about? Those two were proven and admitted terrorists. So all the teeth-knashing you've been doing has been--by your own words here--completely unnecessary.
In the instance of this one example maybe... but in terms of the principle in general, no. I disagree with the existence of any system that allows room for the possibility of innocent people being tortured.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6712|'Murka

Braddock wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Braddock wrote:

I've said many times before that I couldn't really give a shit what happens to actual proven terrorists... what worries me is a system that does not worry about legitimately proving whether a person is a terrorist or not and just proceeds straight to the torture.
Then what are you crying about? Those two were proven and admitted terrorists. So all the teeth-knashing you've been doing has been--by your own words here--completely unnecessary.
In the instance of this one example maybe... but in terms of the principle in general, no. I disagree with the existence of any system that allows room for the possibility of innocent people being tortured.
Again, what are you crying about? There is no proof (or even evidence beyond hearsay) that any "innocent" people have been questioned in this manner.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard